References
- Abend, G. (2018). The love of neuroscience: A sociological account. Sociological Theory, 36(1), 88–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275118759697
- Aderibigbe, S. A. (2020). Online discussions as an intervention for strengthening students’ engagement in general education. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040098
- Agustina, P. Z. R., & Cheng, T. H. (2020). How students’ perspectives about online learning amid the covid-19 pandemic? Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(3), 133–139.
- Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
- Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13, 544–559.
- Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachement et perte, vol. 1: L’attachement. In Jolibert, A. et Jourdan, P. Marketing research. Méthodes de recherche et d’études en marketing (pp. 279–283). PUF.
- Bukhsh, Q., & Chaudhary, M. A. (2015). Exploring the role of distributed learning in distance education at Allama Iqbal Open University: Academic challenges at postgraduate level. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.00342
- Byram, M., & Feng, A. (Eds.). (2006). Living and studying abroad: Research and practice. Multilingual Matters.
- Cacioppo, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2016). Demystifying the neuroscience of love. Emotion Review, 8(2), 108–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915594432
- Clifton, G. (2017). An evaluation of the impact of “learning design” on the distance learning and teaching experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 277–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2960
- Creswell & Guetterman. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
- Dewey, J. (1903). Democracy in education. The Elementary School Teacher, 4(4), 193–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/453309
- Ding, L., Kim, C., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 115, 126–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.016
- Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13.
- Easton, S. S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor’s role in online distance learning, communicative education. Communication Education, 52(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302470
- Erichsen, E. A., & Bolliger, D. U. (2011). Towards understanding international graduate student isolation in traditional and online environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9161-6
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
- Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. Continuum.
- Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/9/fusch1.pdf
- Glaser, B. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
- Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2011). Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. [Online document]. University of Florida IFAS Extension.
- Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378802
- Haynie, D. (2014, May 24). U.S. online degrees pose challenges for international students. U.S. World Report News. http://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/2014/05/23/us-online-degrees-pose-challenges-for-international-students
- Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2013). Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 77–86.
- Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2011). Online and hybrid course enrollment and performance in Washington State Community and Technical Colleges. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
- Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107
- Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Language education and multiliteracies. In S. May & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 195–211). Springer.
- Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). New learning: Elements of a science of education. Cambridge University Press.
- Karkar-Esperat, T. M. (2018). International graduate students‘ challenges and learning experiences in online classes. Journal of International Students, 8(4), 1722–1735.
- Karkar Esperat, T. (2019). Assessing preservice teachers' knowledge of new literacies, Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
- Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 107–115.
- Knapke, J., Haynes, E., Breen, J., Kuhnell, P., Smith, L., & Meinzen-Derr, J. (2016). Evaluation of online graduate epidemiology instruction and student outcomes. Online Learning, 20(4), 201–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i4.737
- Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners’ perceptions toward the web-based distance learning activities/assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid instructional model. Journal of Informational Technology Education, 2, 105–113. http://jite.org/documents/Vol2/v2p105–113–78.pdf
- Kress, H., Thering, A., Lalonde, C., Kim, S., & Cleeton, L. (2012). Faculty reflections on online course development and implementation for teacher education. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 8(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v08i01/56263
- Kumar, S., Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Elements of award-winning courses. Online Learning, 23(4), 160–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2077
- Kumi-Yeboah, A., Dogbey, J., & Yuan, G. (2017). Online collaborative learning activities: The perspectives of minority graduate students. Online Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1277
- Kumi-Yeboah, A., Dogbey, J. K., Yuan, G., & Smith, P. (2020). Cultural diversity in online learning: An exploration of instructors’ perceptions and challenges. Teachers College Record. https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=23332
- Kumi-Yeboah, A., Sallar, A. W., Kiramba, L. K., & Kim, Y. (2020). Exploring the use of digital technologies from the perspective of diverse learners in online learning environments. Online Learning, 24(4), 42–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2323
- Lederman, D. (2019). Online enrollments grow, but pace slows. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2019/12/11/more-students-study-online-rate-growth-slowed-2018
- Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2017). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Education, 197(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741719700202
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
- Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2020). Social presence and online discussions: A mixed method investigation. Distance Education, 41(4), 490–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821603
- Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory into Practice, 51(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324
- Marks, N. F., & Song, J. (2009). Compassionate motivation and compassionate acts across the adult life course: Evidence from US national studies. In B. Fehr, S. Sprecher & L. G. Under- wood (Eds.), The science of compassionate love: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 121–158). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Marshall, G. (2005). The purpose, design and administration of a questionnaire for data collection. Radiography, 11(2), 131–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2004.09.002
- Martin, J. R. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, 3, 39.
- Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
- McKinney, B. K. (2018). The impact of program-wide discussion board grading rubrics on students and faculty satisfaction. Online Learning, 22(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1386
- Mehall, S. (2020). Purposeful interpersonal interaction in online learning: What is it and how is it measured? Online Learning, 24(1), 182–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.2002
- Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
- Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
- Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (Eds.). (2009). Encyclopedia of case study research. Sage.
- Morse, K. (2003). Does one size fit all? Exploring asynchronous learning in a multicultural environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 37–55.
- Moss, B., & Lapp, D. (2010). Teaching new literacies in grades 4–6: Resources for 21st-century classrooms (Vol. 1). The Guilford Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. National Academies Press.
- New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.
- Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2000). Making the transition: Helping teachers to teach online. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452806.pdf
- Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.
- Pokorny, J. J., Norman, A., Zanesco, A. P., Bauer-Wu, S., Sahdra, B. K., & Saron, C. D. (2018). Network analysis for the visualization and analysis of qualitative data. Psychological Methods, 23(1), 169–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000129
- Price, D. W. (2020). Library, classroom and action centre: Design metaphors that shape pedagogy, roles and success criteria for online courses. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 15(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1684922
- Qiu, M., & McDougall, D. (2013). Foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses: Advantages and disadvantages of online versus face-to-face subgroup discourse. Computers & Education, 67, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.005
- Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: A systematic. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
- Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
- Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
- Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Schoder, E. M. (2010). Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of love [Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University-Graduate School of Education].
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
- Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory and techniques. Sage.
- Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning—predictions and possibilities. Education Sciences, 8(1), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010035
- Underwood, L. G. (2005). Interviews with Trappist monks as a contribution to research methodology in the investigation of compassionate love. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00280.x
- Underwood, L. G. (2009). Compassionate love: A framework for research. In B. Fehr, S. Sprecher, & L. G. Underwood (Eds.), The science of compassionate love: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 3–25). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Whiteside, A. L., Garrett Dikkers, A., & Swan, K. (Eds.). (2017). Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research. Stylus.