Storyworlding: an outline of the philosophic commitments and research applications of a new feminist methodology*

References

• Alexander, M. J. (2005). Pedagogies of crossing: Meditations on feminism, sexual politics, memory, and the sacred. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (2018). The human condition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1958)
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. (2002). The retreat from organization: US feminism reconceptualized. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, L. (2014). Training in feminist research methodology: Doing research on the margins. Women & Therapy, 37(1–2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2014.850347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (1998). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, L. (2018). Love in the time of ethnography: Essays on connection as a focus and basis for research. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, M., & Macnab, M. (2018). Doing the feminist intergenerational mic: Methodological reflections on digital storytelling as process and praxis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(2), 19.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, B. (2013). No so obvious? The structural elements of caring: An example for critical qualitative studies. In B. Dennis, L. Carspecken, and P. Carspecken (Eds.), Qualitative research: A reader on philosophy, core concepts, and practice. Series – counter points: Studies in the postmodern theory of education (pp. 407–437). Peter Lang Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, B. (2020). Walking with strangers: Critical ethnography and educational promise. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, B., Carspecken, L., Zhao, P., Silberstein, S., Saxena, P., Bose, S., Palmer, D., Washington, S., & Elfreich, A. (2020). Digital migrating and storyworlding with women we love: A feminist ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 49(6), 745–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620937758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M. (2018). Changing conceptions of culture and ethnography in anthropology of education in the United States. In D. Beach, C. Bagley, & S. Marques da Silva (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of ethnography of education (pp. 151–172). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (2018). Just research in contentious times: Widening the methodological imagination. Columbia, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1974). “From the native's point of view": On the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 28(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/3822971
   Google Scholar
• Ghelfi, A. (2015). Worlding politics: Justice, commons and technoscience [Unpublished Dissertation]. School of Management, University of Leicester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gringeri, C. E., Wahab, S., & Anderson-Nathe, B. (2010). What makes it feminist?: Mapping the landscape of feminist social work research. Affilia, 25(4), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109910384072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glapka, E. (2018). If you look at me like a piece of meat, then that’s a problem”—women in the center of the male gaze: Feminist poststructuralist discourse analysis as a tool of critique. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1390480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., Harper, K., & Otañez, M. (2015). Participatory visual and digital research in action. Leftcoast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Volume 2: Lifeword and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2013). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (Trans. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson). Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. Garland Publishing, Inc. (Original work published 1962)
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1992). History of the concept of time: Prolegomena (vol. 717). Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1979)
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press. (Original work published 1983)
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, L. (2019). Toward a language of sexual gray zones: Feminist collective knowledge building through autobiographical multimedia storytelling. Feminist Media Studies, 19(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1467944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepler, J. (1967). Somnium. The dream or posthumous work on lunar astronomy. Dover Publications, Inc. (Original work published 1609, 1634)
   Google Scholar
• Korth, B. (2006). Establishing universal human rights through war crimes trials and the need for cosmopolitan law in an age of diversity. Liverpool Law Review, 27(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-005-5349-y
   Google Scholar
• Korth, B. (2007). Leaps of faith in social science. Capturing the imaginary in the discourse of the real. International Journal for Qualitative Methods, 6(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. (2002). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1978). Theses on Feuerbach. In R. Tucker (Ed.) The Marx-Engels reader. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (2009). The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (M. Milligan, Trans.). In K. Marx, & F. Engels, The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 and the communist manifesto (pp.13–170). Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei. Pamphlet. Retrieved April 9, 2022, from http://la.utexas.edu/users/hcleaver/368/368CommunistManifestoPtItable.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, P. (2009). Feminist ethnography: Storytelling that makes a difference. Qualitative Social Work, 8(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009103373
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, R. (2013). Storytelling and co-authorship in feminist alliance work: Reflections from a journey. Gender, Place and Culture, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2012.731383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, K., & George, K. (2012). Stories about getting stories: Interactional dimensions in folk and personal narrative research. In J. Gubrium, J. Holstein, A. Marvasti, & K. McKinney (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Interview Research (pp. 511–521). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. H. (2011). Introduction: Worlding cities, or the art of being global. U.K.: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, D. (2012). Worlding justice/Commoning matter. Occasion: Interdisciplinary studies in humanities Online, (3). http://arcade.stanford.edu/occasion/worlding-justicecommoning-matter [Accessed 3/13/2021].
   Google Scholar
• Pettiman, J. (1996). Worlding women: A feminist international politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, D. (2016). Resisting the male gaze: Feminist responses to the “normalization” of the female body in Western culture. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 17(1), 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray, N. (2015). Counter-mapping as situated knowledge: Integrating lay expertise in participatory geographic research. In A. Gubrium, K. Harper, & M. Otañez (Eds.), Participatory visual and digital research in action (pp. 131–146). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C. (2009). Imagining the other? Ethical challenges of researching and writing women's embodied lives. Feminism & Psychology, 19(2), 245–266.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C., & Mündel, I. (2018). Story-making as methodology: Disrupting dominant stories through multimedia storytelling. Canadian Review of Sociology, 55(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice, C. (2020). Digital storytelling. In P. Crawford, B. Brown, & A. Charise (Eds.), Companion for health humanities (pp. 341–346). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C., Dion, S., Fowlie, H., & Mündel, I. (2020). Settler logics through multimedia storytelling. Feminist Media Studies, Online first, 1–36. 10.1080/14680777.2019.1707256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secor, A., & Linz, J. (2017). Becoming minor. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(4), 568–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817710075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, A., Linz, J., & Hudson, L. (2020). A feminist coven in the university. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(6), 854–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1681367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. (1985). Three women's texts and a critique of imperialism. Critical inquiry, 12(1), 243-261.
   Google Scholar
• Trix, F. (2018). Europe and the refugee crisis: Local responses to migrants. New York, N: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tugendhat, E. (1986). Self-consciousness and self-determination (Trans. P. Stern). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1969). Liminality and Communitas. In V. Turner, Ed. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure (pp. 96–130). Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar