From lines to circles: love as a component of validity

References

• Behar, R. (1997). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behar, R. (2013). Traveling heavy: A memoir in between journeys. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cammarota, J. & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, L. 2011). An unreal estate: Sustainability and freedom in an evolving community. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, L. (2015). The unbounded self: Peak experiences and border crossings in Southern Indiana. Anthropology of Consciousness, 26(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/anoc.12038
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, L. (2018). Ethical openness in Turkey: An Alevi-Sunni love story. In L. Carspecken (Ed.), Love in the time of ethnography: Essays on connection as a focus and basis for research (pp. 35–58). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, L. (2018). Introduction: Love in the time of ethnography. In L. Carspecken (Ed.), Love in the time of ethnography: Essays on connection as a focus and basis for research (pp. 1–15). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, P. (1995). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, P. (2018). Metanoia: Violence, love and forgiveness in ethnographic writing. In L. Carspecken (Ed.), Love in the time of ethnography: Essays on connection as a focus and basis for research (pp. 1–15). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Comte, A. (1988). Introduction to positive philosophy. Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, B. (2016). Myths of monoculturalism: narratively claiming the other. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(9), 1069–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, B. K., Carspecken, L., Zhao, P., Silberstein, S., Bose, S., Saxena, P., Palmer, D., Washington, S., & Elfreich, A. (2020). Digital migrating and storyworlding with women we love: A feminist ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 49(6), 754–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620937758
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, B. (2020). Walking with strangers: Critical ethnography and educational promise. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (2005). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. Cosimo Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Jones, N. (2021). The 1619 project. Kokila.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, b. (2000). All about love: New visions. Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 18, 342(6156), 377–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laura, C. (2016). Intimate inquiry: A love-based approach to qualitative research. Critical Questions in Education, 7(3), 215–231.
   Google Scholar
• Manne, K. (2018). Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mau, S. (2019). The metric society: On the quantification of the social. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myerhoff, B. (1980). Number our days: A triumph of continuity and culture among Jewish old people in an urban ghetto. Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, K. (2007). My family and other saints. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, U. (2004). The project of feminist epistemology: Perspectives from a nonwestern feminist. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 213–224). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. (1980). A Way of being. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, H. (1994). Love, power and knowledge: Towards a feminist transformation of the sciences. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanjek, R. (2014). Introduction. Deep grooves: Anthropology and mutuality. In R. Sanjek (Ed.), Mutuality: Anthropology’s changing terms of engagement (pp. 1–11). University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, P. (2021). Gender and Computer Science Debate at Indian Institutes of Technology. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 13(2), 88–109.
   Google Scholar
• Skoggard, I. (2018). Love lost and found: A sentimental history of American medical missionaries in china. In L. Carspecken (Ed.), Love in the time of ethnography: Essays on connection as a focus and basis for research (pp. 81–101). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Toye, M. E. (2010). Towards a poetics of love: Poststructuralist feminist ethics and literary creation. Feminist Theory, 11(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700109355212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterston, A. (1999). Love, sorrow and rage: Destitute women in a manhattan residence. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar