The quality of peer assessment in a wiki-based online context: a qualitative study

References

• Blin , F. and Munro , M. 2008 . Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory . Computers & Education , 50 : 475 – 490 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan , R.C. and Biklen , S.K. 1994 . Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods , New York , NY : Pearson Education Group .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. and Falchikov , N. 2007 . Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term , New York , NY : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Draper, S.W. (2007). A momentary review of assessment principles. Keynote at the REAP Conference – Assessment design for learner responsibility. Retrieved May 2, 2010, from http://www.reap.ac.uk/reap/reap07/Portals/2/CSL/keynotes/david%20nicol/A_momentary_review_of_assessment_principles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers, U.-D., & Pawlowski, J.M. (2006). Quality in European e-learning: An introduction. In U-D., Ehlers, & J.M., Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fox , M. and Helford , P. 1999 . Northern Arizona University: Advancing the boundaries of higher education in Arizona using the World Wide Web . Interactive Learning Environments , 7 ( 2–3 ) : 155 – 174 .
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S. (2007). Peer assessment as a tool for learning. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven. Retrieved November 14, 2010, from https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/1979/1033
   Google Scholar
• Joordens , S. , Shakinaz Desa , S. and Paré , D. 2009 . The pedagogical anatomy of peer-assessment: Dissecting a peer scholar assignment . Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics , 7 ( 5 ) : 11 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Steckelberg, A. & Srinivasan, S. (2009). Utilizing peer interactions to promote learning through a web-based peer assessment system. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 34(2). Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/497/228
   Google Scholar
• Li , L. , Liu , X. and Steckelberg , A. 2010 . Assessor or assesses: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback . British Journal of Educational Technology , 41 ( 3 ) : 525 – 536 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, M. J., Pombo, L., Balula, A & Moreira, A (2007). Integrating Eassessment as an Inmost Part of the Teaching and Learning Process. Proceeding of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Chesapeake, Quebec City, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• McConlogue, T. (2012). But is it fair? Developing students’ understanding of grading complex written work through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. (2008). Peer assessment in an EFL context: Attitudes and Correlations. Proceedings of the Second Language Research Forum (pp. 89–107). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Pombo, L., Loureiro, M.J., Balula, A., & Moreira, A. (2009). Diversity of strategies to promote effective b-Learning: A case study in Higher Education. In U. Bernath, A. Szücs, A. Tait & M. Vidal (Eds.). Distance and elearning in transition – learning innovation, technology and social challenges (pp. 624–644). New York, NY: ISTE & Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pombo , L. , Loureiro , M. and Moreira , A. 2010 . Assessing collaborative work in a higher education blended learning context: Strategies and students’ perceptions . Educational Multimedia International , 47 ( 3 ) : 217 – 229 .
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, A.J., Mendelssohn, J., Coleman K. & Allen, B. (2008). Did I mention it’s anonymous? The triumphs and pitfalls of online peer review. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of ascilite conference, 30 Nov-3 Dec, Melbourne, Australia, 830–840. Retrieved October 2, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/rourke.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sato , M. , Wei , R.C. and Darling-Hammond , L. 2008 . Improving teachers’ assessment practices through professional development: The case of national board certification . American Educational Research Journal , 45 ( 3 ) : 669 – 700 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans , D.M.A. , Brand-Gruwel , S. , Van Merrie¨nboer , J.J.G. and Martens , R.L. 2004 . Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions . Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 41 : 60 – 78 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomanek , D. , Talanquer , V. and Novodvorsky , I. 2007 . What do science teachers consider when selecting formative assessment tasks? . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 45 ( 10 ) : 1113 – 1130 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K.J. 2008 . Peer assessment . Theory into Practice , 48 ( 1 ) : 20 – 27 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K.J. 2010 . Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment . Learning and Instruction , 20 : 339 – 343 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K.J. , Smith , E.F. , Swanson , I. and Elliot , A. 2000 . Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 ( 2 ) : 149 – 166 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkus, S. (2003). Information literacy in Europe: A literature review. Information Research, 8(4). Paper No. 159. Retrieved October 2, 2010, from http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper159.html
   Google Scholar
• Zundert , M. , Sluijsmans , D. and Merriënboer , J. 2010 . Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions . Learning and Instruction , 20 ( 4 ) : 270 – 279 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar