Going beyond textbooks: a study on seamless science inquiry in an upper primary class

References

• Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., O’Malley, C., & Wright, M. (2012). Creating personal meaning through technology-supported science inquiry learning across formal and informal settings. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 251–273.10.1080/09500693.2011.569958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23, 42–44.
   Google Scholar
• EDB. (2008). Digital 21 strategy: Foreword. Retrieved April 12, 2009 from http://www.info.gov.hk/digital21/eng/strategy/2008/Foreword.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ergin, İ. (2012). Constructivist approach based 5E model and usability instructional physics. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 6, 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Progressive inquiry in a computer-supported biology class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1072–1088.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 65–80). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Scanlon, E., & Clough, G. (2013). Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education, 61, 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, S. C. (2011). An evaluation study of the use of a cognitive tool in a one-to-one classroom for promoting classroom-based dialogic interaction. Computers & Education, 57, 1851–1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakkala, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Teachers’ pedagogical designs for technology-supported collective inquiry: A national case study. Computers & Education, 45, 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K. M., & Kong, S. C. (2011). A report on “Review survey(s) on the third strategy on information technology (IT) in education”. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837–858.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2014). Enacting a technology-based science curriculum across a grade level: The journey of teachers’ appropriation. Computers & Education, 71, 222–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, C.-K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: A study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 269–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J., Smart, J., & Horton, R. (2010). The design and validation of EQUIP: An instrument to assess inquiry-based instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C., & Horton, R. M. (2011). The relationship of teacher-facilitated, inquiry-based instruction to student higher-order thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 93–101.10.1111/ssm.2011.111.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y. (2011). What are the affordances and constraints of handheld devices for learning at higher education? British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, E163–E166.10.1111/bjet.2011.42.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y. (2014). “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)” for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Computers & Education, 74, 50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Looi, C.-K. (2012). Linking teacher beliefs, practices and student inquiry-based learning in a CSCL environment: A tale of two teachers. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 129–159.10.1007/s11412-011-9133-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, L.-H. (2012). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, E19–E23.10.1111/bjet.2012.43.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L.-H., Chen, W., & Jan, M. (2012). How artefacts mediate small-group co-creation activities in a mobile-assisted seamless language learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 411–424.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2364–2381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Morley, E. A., Scardamalia, M., & Teo, C. L. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 262–307.10.1080/10508406.2011.528317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar