The impact of students’ exploration strategies on discovery learning using computer-based simulations

References

• Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18.10.1037/a0021017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, W. (1973). Learning to discover rules by discovery. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 325–328.10.1037/h0034585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E.-J., … Herring, S. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science & Education, 91, 750–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education (Vol. 1). New York, NY, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University. (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 66–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46, 249–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., Martin, E., Zamarro, J. M., Esquembre, F., Swaak, J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1999). The integration of computer simulation and learning support: An example from the physics domain of collisions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 597–615.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201.10.3102/00346543068002179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, R. (1991). Scientific reasoning across different domains. In E. de Corte, M. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 345–373). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hannafin, R. D., & Sullivan, H. J. (1995). Learner control in full and lean CAI programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 19–30.10.1007/BF02300479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, B., Hedberg, J., & Brown, C. (1995). Investigating Lake Iluka [Computer software]. Wollongong: University of Wollongong NSW/Interactive Multimedia Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.10.1080/00461520701263368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G. E., & Judd, T. S. (2004). Making sense of audit trail data. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 20, 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kersh, B. Y., & Wittrock, M. C. (1962). Learning by discovery: An interpretation of recent research. Journal of Teacher Education, 13, 461–468.10.1177/002248716201300417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketelhut, D. J., Nelson, B. C., Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2010). A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 56–68.10.1111/bjet.2010.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettanurak, V. N., Ramamurthy, K., & Haseman, W. D. (2001). User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: An empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 541–583.10.1006/ijhc.2001.0457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 299–303.10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661–667.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 495–523.10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285–327.10.1207/s1532690xci0904_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Künsting, J., Wirth, J., & Paas, F. (2011). The goal specificity effect on strategy use and instructional efficiency during computer-based scientific discovery learning. Computers & Education, 56, 668–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117–131.10.1023/A:1002919531780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. J. W., & Dalgarno, B. (2011). Scaffolding discovery learning in 3D virtual environments: Challenges and considerations for instructional design. In S. Hai-Jew (Ed.), Virtual Immersive and 3D Learning Spaces: Emerging Technologies and Trends (pp. 138–169). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Leutner, D. (1993). Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: Effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction, 3, 113–132.10.1016/0959-4752(93)90011-N
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. T., & Wilensky, U. (2005). An analysis of student’ patterns of exploration with NetLogo models embedded in the connected chemistry environment: Center for connected learning and computer-based modelling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, B., Marton, F., Ottosson, T., & Laurillard, D. (1993). Computer simulation as a tool for developing intuitive and conceptual understanding in mechanics. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 263–281.10.1016/0747-5632(93)90011-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milheim, W. D., & Martin, B. L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 99–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, J. M., & Clement, J. (1999). Use of a computer simulation to develop mental simulations for understanding relative motion concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 921–944.10.1080/095006999290237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njoo, M., & De Jong, T. (1993). Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instructional support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 821–844.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24, 5–12.10.3102/0013189X024007005
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York, NY: Grossman.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1977). Science of education and the psychology of the child (D. Coltman, Trans.). In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 695–725). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, M. (1974). Play as exploratory learning: Studies of curiosity behavior. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, P. (1991). Detecting functional relations in a computerized discovery environment. Learning and Instruction, 1, 45–65.10.1016/0959-4752(91)90018-4
   Google Scholar
• Rieber, L. P., Tzeng, S.-C., & Tribble, K. (2004). Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: Finding the right mix. Learning and Instruction, 14, 307–323.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers, R. H., & Vockell, E. (1987). Computer simulations to stimulate scientific problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 403–415.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 80–84.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Raghavan, K., & Reiner, M. (1991). Causal models and experimentation strategies in scientific reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 201–238.10.1207/s15327809jls0102_3
   Google Scholar
• Steuter, E., & Doyle, J. (2010). Re-vitalizing the first year class through student engagement and discovery learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 10, 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K., & Reimann, P. (2010). Patterns of use of an agent-based model and a system dynamics model: The application of patterns of use and the impacts on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 54, 392–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. W. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? (pp. 17–40). New York, NY Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar