529
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Techno Savvy: a Web 2.0 curriculum encouraging critical thinking

Pages 259-277 | Received 13 Aug 2014, Accepted 10 Oct 2014, Published online: 20 Nov 2014

References

  • Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies, and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
  • Barab, S., Arcici, A., & Jackson, C. (2005). Eat your vegetables and do your homework: A design-based investigation of enjoyment and meaning in learning. Educational Technology, 45, 15–21.
  • Borsheim, C., Merritt, K., & Reed, D. (2008). Beyond technology for technology’s sake: Advancing multiliteracies in the twenty-first century. The Clearing House, 82, 87–90.10.3200/TCHS.82.2.87-90
  • Chittleborough, G., Jobling, W., Hubber, P., & Calnin, G. (2011, September). The use of Web 2.0 Technologies to promote higher order thinking skills. In AARE 2008: International Education Research Conference, Brisbane: Australian Association for Research in Education.
  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – Opportunities, challenges and tensions. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta) with Fisher, T., Cummings, J., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Oliver, M., & Sharples, M. Retrieved from http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/web2_technologies_learning.pdf
  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused. Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Dahms, M., Geonnotti, K., Passalacqua, J. N., Schilk, J. N., Wetzel, A., & Zulkowsky, M. (2007). The educational theory of Lev Vygotsky: An analysis. New Foundations Press. Clabaugh, G. K., & Rozycki, E. G., (Eds.). Retrieved from: http://www.newfoundations.com/GALLERY/Vygotsky.html
  • Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43, 44–48.
  • Ennis, R. (1997). Incorporating critical thinking in the curriculum: An introduction to some basic issues. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 16(3), 1–9.
  • Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. eLearning, 2, 5–16.
  • Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games + good learning: Collected essays on video games learning and literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (NCES 2010-040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246–259.10.3102/0013189X09336671
  • Hasan, M. M., & Hoon, T. B. (2013). Podcast applications in language learning: A review of recent studies. English Language Teaching, 6, 128–135.
  • Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 312–333. doi:10.1002/RRQ.002
  • Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, Al., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: The MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved from www.digitallearning.macfound.org
  • Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J., & Haas, J. (2009). The instructional power of digital games, social networking, simulations and how teachers can leverage them. The Education Arcade, MIT. Retrieved from http://education.mit.edu/papers/GamesSimsSocNets_EdArcade.pdf
  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353.10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
  • Law, N. (2005, May). Assessing learning outcomes in CSCL settings. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: Learning 2005 the next 10 years! (pp. 373–377). Taipei: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  • LeBaron, J., Robinson, J. M., & McDonough, E. (2009. Research report for GeSCI meta-review of ICT in education phase two. Retrieved from http://www.gesci.org/assets/files/Research/meta-research-phase2.pdf
  • Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., & Reifsneider, D. (2009). Technology in schools: What the research says: An update. Culver City, CA: Commissioned by Cisco.
  • Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., Thadani, V., & Martin, C. (2003). North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, enGauge 21st Century Skills, Literacy in the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.metiri.com/21/21%20Century%20Skills%20Final.doc
  • Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2005). Teen content creators and consumers. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Lenhart, A., Madden, M., MacGill, A. R., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What can it be? Educational Leadership, 46, 38–43.
  • McGuinness, C. (1999). From thinking skills to thinking classrooms. London: Published report for Department of Education and Employment.
  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
  • McMahon, G. (2009). Critical thinking and ICT integration in a Western Australian secondary school. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 269–281.
  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2006). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2005. In U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES 2007-020. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007020
  • Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2008). On its way to K–12 classrooms, Web 2.0 goes to graduate school. Computers in the Schools, 25, 163–180.10.1080/07380560802368116
  • Oblinger, D. (2008). Growing up with Google: What it means to education, Emerging technologies for learning, Becta (Vol. 3, pp. 11–29). Retrieved from http://partners.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=rh&rid=13768
  • Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2004). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/route21/images/stories/epapers/skillsfoundationsfinal.pdf
  • Rakes, G., Fields, V., & Cox, K. (2006). The influence of teacher’s technology use in instructional practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 411–426. ProQuest Education Journals.10.1080/15391523.2006.10782467
  • Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 65–83.10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
  • Rideout, V., & Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010, January). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. The Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68.10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Slavin, R. E. (2003). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Squire, K. (2004). Replaying history: Learning world history through playing civilization III (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University. Retrieved from http://website.education.wisc.edu/kdsquire/dissertation.html
  • Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2004). Harnessing the power of games in education. Insight, 3, 5–33.
  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Steinkuehler, C. (2010, September). Video games and digital literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54, 61–63.
  • Thomas, D., & Seely-Brown, J. (2011). A new culture of learning. Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Weigel, M., & Heikinnen, K. (2007). Developing minds and digital media: Habits of mind in the YouTube era. (The Good Work Project Series Report 51). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • Wideman, H. (2007). ABEL Participant Experience Evaluation. Report prepared for the Advanced Broadband Enabled Learning, Office of the Vice President Research and Innovation, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Unpublished.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.