642
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Recommendations for professional development necessary for iPad integration

Pages 165-184 | Received 03 Apr 2017, Accepted 22 Jun 2017, Published online: 13 Oct 2017

References

  • Abell, F. (2008). 1:1 Computing in public schools: Lessons from “laptops for all” programs. Retrieved from http://www.abell.org/sites/default/files/publications/ed_onetoone_908.pdf
  • Al-Bataineh, A., Andersons, S., Toledo, C., & Wellinski, S. (2008). A study of technology integration in the classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35(4), 381–387.
  • Bauer, J. F. (2002). Interpreting teaching practices in educational technology: A study of 30 teachers’ utilization of computers in classroom instruction (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International. (ProQuest® Publication No. AAT 3054552).
  • Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.
  • Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 1–60.
  • Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O’Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: Why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45–63.10.1080/15391523.2004.10782425
  • Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is larry cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51), 1–31.
  • Benton, B. K. (2012). The iPad as an instructional tool: An examination of teacher implementation experiences (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1029869338).
  • Bitner, N., & Bitner, J. (2002). Integrating technology into the classroom: Eight keys to success. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 95–100.
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. N. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bouterse, B., Corn, J. O., & Halstead, E. O. (2009). Choosing the perfect tools for one-to-one. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(1), 14–17.
  • Brooks-Young, S. (2005). Integration issues for 21st-century teachers. Today’s Catholic Teacher, 38(4), 14–17.
  • Carter, K. Z. (2008). The effects of technology professional development program on PK-12 educators’ levels of technology integration (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 304380335).
  • Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.1.65-75
  • Cheng, R. (2013, October 28). Apple CEO: We’ve locked up 94% of the education tablet market. CNET Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.cnet.com/news/apple-ceo-weve-locked-up-94-of-education-tablet-market
  • Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2011). The effectiveness of education technology for enhancing reading achievement: A meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research and Reform in Education. Retrieved from http://www.bestevidence.org/word/tech_read_Feb_24_2011.pdf
  • Chou, C. C., Block, L., & Jesness, R. (2012). A case study of mobile learning pilot project in K-12 schools. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(2), 11–26.
  • Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.10.3102/00028312038004813
  • Donovan, L., Hartley, K., & Strudler, N. (2007). Teacher concerns during initial implementing of a one to one laptop initiative at the middle school level. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 263–286.10.1080/15391523.2007.10782483
  • Dornisch, M. (2013). The digital divide in classrooms: Teacher technology comfort and evaluations. Computers in the Schools, 30(3), 210–228.10.1080/07380569.2012.734432
  • Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education. Educational Technology Magazine, 42(1), 5–13. Retrieved from http://bookstoread.com/etp/earle.pdf
  • Gorder, L. M. (2008). A study of teacher perceptions of instructional technology integration in the classroom. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 50(2), 63–76.
  • Herrington, N. (2006). Open space conferences: A new way of working. Management in Education, 20(5), 13–14.10.1177/089202060602000503
  • Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  • Hinson, J. M., Laprairie, K. N., & Cundiff, J. M. (2005). One size does not fit all. T.H.E. Journal, 32(11), 26–28, 30.
  • Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1648–1663. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.002
  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010a). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(2), 137–154. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004
  • International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). ISTE teacher standards. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf
  • Jimoyiannisa, A., & Komisb, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149–173.10.1080/13664530701414779
  • Judson, E. (2010). Improving technology literacy: Does it open doors to traditional content? Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(3), 271–284. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9135-8
  • Kenny, M. (2014). Making conferences human places of learning. Adult Learner: The Irish Journal of Adult and Community Education. Retrieved from http://www.aontas.com/download/pdf/the_adult_learner_journal_2014.pdf
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kulik, J. A. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say (SRI Project Report #P10446.001). Arlington, VA: SRI International.
  • Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. doi:10.3102/0034654307309921
  • Lei, J. & Zhao, Y. (2008). One-to-one computing: What does it bring to schools? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(2), 97–122.
  • Levin, D. & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: American Institutes of Research.
  • Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer mediated classroom lesson. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00774.x
  • Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Daniel Strahl, J., & Ross, S. M. (2008). Does technology integration “work” when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45(3), 195–213. doi:10.1080/09523980802284317
  • Males, N. (2011). Uses and attitudes toward educational technology among new teachers in urban schools: A correlational study (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 883382579).
  • McLester, S. (2011). Lessons learned from one-to-one. District Administration, 47(6), 34–38.
  • Mills, S. C., & Tincher, R. C. (2003). Be the technology: A developmental model for evaluating technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education (International Society for Technology in Education), 35(3), 382.
  • Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23, 40–42.
  • Mouza, C. (2002). Learning to teach with new technology: Implications for professional development. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 35(2), 272–289.
  • National Education Association. (2008). Access, adequacy, and equity in education technology. Results of a survey of America’s teachers and support professionals on technology in public schools and classrooms. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/pdfs/NEA-Access,Adequacy,andEquityinEdTech.pdf
  • Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.
  • Pierson, M. E. (2014). Technology Integration Practice as a Function of Pedagogical Expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413–430.
  • Pogany, W. S. (2009). Evolving pedagological perceptions of teachers integrating ubiquitous computing in their classrooms: A case study of the South Dakota laptop program. (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 304995339).
  • Polly, D. & Hannafin, M. (2010). Reexamining technology’s role in learner-centered professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 557–571.
  • Puentedura, R. (2013). SMAR and TPCK: An introduction. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/03/28/SAMRandTPCK_AnIntroduction.pdf
  • Ravitz, J., & Mergendoller, J. (2002). Technology use and achievement in Idaho schools: A state wide study of schools, teachers, and students. Final evaluation report. Novato, CA: Beryl Buck Institute for Education.
  • Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (2001). Effects of teacher efficacy on computer skills and computer cognitions of Canadian students in grades K-3. Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 141–156.
  • Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
  • Sheehan, M. & Nillas, L. (2010). Technology integration in secondary mathematics classrooms: Effect on students' understanding. Journal of Technology Integration in the Classroom, 2(3), 67–83.
  • Shin, N., Sutherland, L. M., Norris, C. A., & Soloway, E. (2012). Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 540–560.
  • Spires, H. A., Wiebe, E., Young, C. A., Hollebrands, K., & Lee, J. K. (2012). Toward a new learning ecology: Professional development for teachers in 1:1 learning environments. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 232–254.
  • Sugar, W. & Kester, D. (2007). Lessons learned from IMPACTing technology integration practices: Four IMPACT model case studies. Computers in the Schools, 24(1), 15–32. doi:10.1300/J025v24n01_03.
  • Storz, M. G. & Hoffman, A. R. (2012). Examining response to a one-to-one computer initiative: Student and teacher voices. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 36(6), 1–18.
  • Topper, A. & Lancaster, S. (2013). Common challenges and experiences of school districts that are implementing 1:1 computing initiatives. Computers in the Schools, 30(4), 346–358. doi:10.1080/07380569.2013.844640.
  • Tournaki, E., Lyublinskaya, I., & Carolan, B. (2011). An Ongoing Professional Development Program and Its Impact on Teacher Effectiveness. The Teacher Educator, 46(4), 299–315. doi:10.1080/08878730.2011.604711.
  • Van Braak, J. (2001). Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(2), 141–157.10.2190/81YV-CGMU-5HPM-04EG
  • Van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407–422. doi:10.1007/BF03173218
  • Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271.10.1080/15391523.2004.10782415
  • Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.