References
- Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw software for network visualization [computer software]. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/netdrawsoftware/home
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis [computer software]. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home
- Brunvand, S. (2015). Facilitating student interaction and collaboration in a MOOC environment. In R. M. Gonzalez (Ed.), User-centered design strategies for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) (pp. 1–14). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Clow, D. (2013, April). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In D. Suthers, K. Verbert, E. Duval, & X. Ochoa (Eds.), LAK2013. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge: LAK 2013 (pp. 185–189). Leuven, Belgium: Association of Computing Machinery.
- Costello, J., & Crane, D. (2013). Technologies for learner-centered feedback. Open Praxis, 5, 217–225.
- de Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 218–231.
- Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014, March). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In M. Sahami, A. Fox, M. A. Hearst, & M. Chi (Eds.), Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale conference (pp. 41–50). Atlanta, Georgia: USA. Association of Computing Machinery. Retrieved from http://pgbovine.net/publications/edX-MOOC-video-production-and-engagement_LAS-2014.pdf
- Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2015). MOOCs in higher education: Institutional goals and paths forward. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Howarth, J. P., D’Alessandro, S., Johnson, L., & White, L. (2016). Learner motivation for MOOC registration and the role of MOOCs as a university ‘taster’. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 35, 74–85.
- Japan Student Services Organization (JASSO). (2016). Survey on the enrollment status of foreign students. Tokyo, Japan: JASSO. Retrieved from http://www.jasso.go.jp/about/statistics/intl_student_e/2015/index.html
- Kizilcec, F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013, April). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In D. Suthers, K. Verbert, E. Duval, & X. Ochoa (Eds.), LAK2013. Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170–179). Leuven, Belgium: Association of Computing Machinery.
- Liu, M., Kang, J., & McKelroy, E. (2015). Examining learners’ perspective of taking a MOOC: Reasons, excitement, and perception of usefulness. Educational Media International, 52, 129–146.
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2013). Sekai no seichou wo torikomutameno gaikokujin ryuugakusei ukeire senryaku [Interim summary of the acceptance strategy of foreign students to capture the growth of the world]. Tokyo, Japan: MEXT. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/ryugaku/1339091.htm
- Ohnishi, A. (2016). Kyanpasuno kokusaikato ryuugakusei soudan: Tayouseini taioushita gakuseishiensabisuno kokuchiku [Campus internationalization and international student counseling: Building student support services to cope with diversity]. Tokyo, Japan: The University of Tokyo Press.
- Ossiannilsson, E., Altinay, F., & Altinay, Z. (2016). Analysis of MOOCs practices from the perspective of learner experiences and quality culture. Educational Media International, 52, 272–283.
- Park, Y., Jung, I., & Reeves, T. C. (2015). Learning from MOOCs: A qualitative case study from the learners’ perspectives. Educational Media International, 52, 72–87.
- Reich, J. (2014). MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-completion-and-retention-in-the-context-of-student-intent
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/index.htm
- Suen, H. K. (2014). Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15, 312–327.
- Takahama, A., & Fujimoto, T. (2017). The progress of the “Studying at Japanese Universities” MOOC for students aiming study at a Japanese university: Focusing on qualitative aspects. Ryuugaku Kouryuu 2017 16–27. Retrieved from http://www.jasso.go.jp/ryugaku/related/kouryu/2017/04.html
- Tyson, C. (2014). From MOOC to shining MOOC. INSIDE HIGHER ED. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/06/25/can-moocs-lure-international-students-us-colleges-and-universities
- The University of Copenhagen’s MOOC Unit. (2015). Massive open online courses at the University of Copenhagen: Experiences from the first two years. Copenhagen, Denmark: The University of Copenhagen. Retrieved from https://moocs.ku.dk/report/UCPH_MOOC_report_2015.pdf
- University of London International Programmes. (2014). MOOC Report 2014. London: University of London.
- Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 570–587.
- Voss, B. D. (2013, March). Massive open online courses (MOOCS): A primer for university and college board members. An Association of Governing Boards White Paper. Washington, D.C., USA: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. Retrieved from http://agb.org/sites/agb.org/files/report_2013_MOOCs.pdf
- Zhang, J., Skryabin, M., & Song, X. (2016). Understanding the dynamics of MOOC discussion forums with simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (SIENA). Distance Education, 37, 270–286.