References
- Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996
- Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
- Aparicio, M., Oliveira, T., Bacao, F., & Painho, M. (2018). Gamification: A key determinant of massive open online course (MOOC) success. Information & Management, 56(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/doi.10.1016/j.im.2018.06.003
- Balch, T. (2013). MOOC student demographics (Spring 2013). http://augmentedtrader.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/mooc-student-demographics/
- Barak, M., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.005
- Bonk, C. J., & Khoo, E. (2014). Adding some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ activities for motivating and retaining learners online. OpenWorldBooks.com and Amazon CreateSpace.
- Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
- Brooker, A., Corrin, L., De Barba, P., Lodge, J., & Kennedy, G. (2018). A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3237
- Charles, L., Triscott, J., Dobbs, B., Tian, P. G., & Babenko, O. (2016). Effectiveness of a core-competency–based program on residents’ learning and experience. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 19(2), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.19.213
- Cooper, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). Reflections on stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2408776.2408787
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
- De Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130
- De Waard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M. S., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Sage.
- Dochy, F. J. R. C., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
- Empson, R. (2013). Coursera brings online instruction to teachers, taking its first steps into the k-12 market. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2013/05/01/coursera-brings-online-instruction-to-teachers-taking-its-first-steps-into-the-k-12-market/
- Ferguson, R., & Sharples, M. (2014). Innovative pedagogy at massive scale: Teaching and learning in MOOCs. In C. Rensing, S. de Freitas, T. Ley, & P. Muñoz-Merino (Eds.), Open learning and teaching in educational communities (pp. 98–111).
- Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103
- Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
- Greene, J. A., Oswald, C. A., & Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of retention and retention and achievement in a massive open online course. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 925–955. https://doi.org/doi:10.3102/0002831215584621
- Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320–341. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.proxy.lib.wayne.edu/10.1111/bjet.12235
- Hodges, C., Lowenthal, P., & Grant, M. (2016, March). Teacher professional development in the digital age: Design considerations for MOOCs for teachers. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2075–2081). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Hodges, C. B. (2015). Professional development tools and technologies. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 591–594). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346397.n246
- Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852
- Kizilcec, R. F., & Piech, C. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses categories and subject descriptors. In LAK 13 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Leuven, Belgium. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2460330
- Kleiman, G. M., Wolf, M. A., & Frye, D. (2013). The digital learning transition MOOC for educators: Exploring a scalable approach to professional development. http://bit.ly/1NomGES
- Kleiman, G. M., Wolf, M. A., & Frye, D. (2015). Educating educators: Designing MOOCs for professional learning. In P. Kim (Ed.), Massive open online courses: The MOOC revolution (pp. pp. 227–279). Routledge.
- Kolowich, S. (2013). The professors who make the MOOCs. The chronicle of higher education, 18. http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage.
- Liu, M., Kang, J., & McKelroy, E. (2015). Examining learners’ perspective of taking a MOOC: Reasons, excitement, and perception of usefulness. Educational Media International, 52(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1053289
- Manning, C., Morrison, B. R., & McIlroy, T. (2014). MOOCs in language education and professional teacher development: Possibilities and potential. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 5(3), 294–308. https://doi.org/http://sisaljournal.org/archives/sep14/manning_morrison_mcilroy/
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed. Jossey-Bass.
- Moore, G. M. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
- Nastasi, B. K., & Hitchcock, J. H. (2015). Mixed methods research and culture-specific interventions: Program design and evaluation (Vol. 2). SAGE Publications.
- Phan, T. (2018). Instructional strategies that respond to global learners’ needs in massive open online courses. Online Learning, 22(2), 95–118. https://doi.org/doi:10.24059/olj.v22i2.1160.
- Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. pp. 731–810). Dordrecht.
- Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. Sage.
- Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Seaton, D. T., Coleman, C., Daries, J., & Chuang, I. (2015). Enrollment in MITx MOOCs: Are we educating educators? EDUCAUSE Review. http://bit.ly/1hrhTEn
- Shah, D. (2019). Year of MOOC-based Degrees: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2018. Class Central. https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2018/
- Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
- Song, L., & McNary, S. (2011). Understanding students’ collaborative online interaction: Analysis of discussion board postings. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(1), 1–14. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Scot_McNary/publication/260123535_Understanding_Students’_Collaborative_Online_Interaction_Analysis_of_Discussion_Board_Postings/links/0deec5373853c8d563000000/Understanding-Students-Collaborative-Online-Interaction-Analysis-of-Discussion-Board-Postings.pdf
- Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
- Sutton, L. A. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223–242. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/9534/
- Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
- Veletsianos, G. (2013). Learner experiences with MOOCs and open online learning. Hybrid Pedagogy Publications. https://hybrid-pedagogy.github.io/LearnerExperiencesInMOOCs/LearnerExperiencesInMOOCs.pdf
- Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in MOOC s: Participation in social networks outside of MOOC s, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570–587. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/bjet.12297
- Warren, J., Rixner, S., Greiner, J., & Wong, S. (2014). Facilitating human interaction in an online programming course. In Proc. SIGCSE 2014 (pp. 665–670). ACM Press.
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
- Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Sari, A. (2018). Instructor experiences designing MOOCs in higher education: Pedagogical, resource, and logistical considerations and challenges. online learning, 22(4), 203–241. https://doi.org/doi:10.24059/olj.v22i4.1495
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds). (2012). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. Springer Science & Business Media.