Modern board games and computational thinking: results of a systematic analysis process

References

• Abbott, S., & Haney, C. (1981). [Online]. Trivial Pursuit: Genus Edition. Parker Brothers. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/2952/trivial-pursuit-genus-edition
   Google Scholar
• Anyanwu, E. G. (2014). Anatomy adventure: A board game for enhancing understanding of anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolellis, P., Stewart, M., Frisina, C., & Kafura, D. (2014). RaBit EscApe: A board game for computational thinking. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 349–352). https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610489
   Google Scholar
• Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M., Belloti, F., Freitas, F., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., & Gloria, A. (2015). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizan, M. T., Mellon, N., Ramli, R. M., & Yusup, S. (2018). Improving teamwork skills and enhancing deep learning via development of board game using cooperative learning method in reaction engineering course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 22, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayeck, R. Y. (2020). Examining board gameplay and learning: A multidisciplinary review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 51(4), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119901286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, M., & Duncan, S. (2016). Computational thinking in the wild: Uncovering complex collaborative thinking through gameplay. Educational Technology, 56(3), 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, M., & Lee, V. R. (2011). Collaborative strategic board games as a site for distributed computational thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2011040105
   Google Scholar
• Bocca, B., & Takahashi, K. (1999). [Online]. Yu-Gi-Oh! Trading card game. Konami Digital Entertainment B.V. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/4154/yu-gi-oh-trading-card-game
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New Frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. B., & Denning, T. (1991). [Online]. The new easy to master dungeons & dragons. TSR. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/17533/new-easy-master-dungeons-dragons
   Google Scholar
• Butts, A. M. (1948). [Online]. Scrabble. Selchow & Righter. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/320/scrabble
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, M. J., Mcshane, N., Eguiluz, A. G., Teilles, T., & Raspail, P. (2016). Practical application of the learning mechanics-game mechanics (LM-GM) framework for serious games analysis in engineering education. Proceedings of 2016 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, REV 2016. no. Table 1. (pp. 391–395). https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2016.7444510
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. C. (2018). Putting the ‘real’ in real options: A board game approach. Journal of Financial Education, 42(1), 102–115.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinot, A., & Fairfield, J. A. (2019). Game-based learning to engage students with physics and astronomy using a board game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 9(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019010104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M., Gibbs, M., & Harrop, M. (2014). Drafting an army: The playful pastime of warhammer 40,000. Games and Culture, 9(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412013513349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cathala, B. (2016). [Online]. Kingdomino. Blue Orange. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/204583/kingdomino
   Google Scholar
• Cathala, B., & Chevallier, C. (2016). [Online]. Kanagawa. IELLO. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/200147/kanagawa
   Google Scholar
• Cathala, B., & Goh, Y. (2015). [Online]. Magic race. Happy Baobab. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/259551/magic-fold
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. H., Yeh, T. K., Tsai, J. C., Lin, C. R., & Chang, C. Y. (2019). Development of an issue-situation-based board game: A systemic learning environment for water resource adaptation education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051341
   Google Scholar
• Chiarello, F., & Castellano, M. G. (2016). Board games and board game design as learning tools for complex scientific concepts: Some experiences. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 6(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2016040101
   Google Scholar
• Childres, I. (2017). [Online]. Gloomhaven. Cephalofair Games. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/174430/gloomhaven
   Google Scholar
• Chioccariello, A., Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., Dagienė, V., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M., Jasutė, E., Malagoli, C., Masiulionytė-Dagienė, V., & Stupurienė, G. (2022). Reviewing computational thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Dancz, C. L. A., Parrish, K., Bilec, M. M., & Landis, A. E. (2017). Assessment of students’ mastery of construction management and engineering concepts through board game design. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 143(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darrow, C., & Magie, E. J. (1935). Online. Monopoly. Parker Brothers. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/1406/monopoly
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, A. F., & Kodama, H. M. Y. (2010). Jogos no ensino da matemática. Revista Ciência em Extensão, 3, 30.
   Google Scholar
• de Olympio, P. C. A. P., & Alvim, N. A. T. (2018). Board games: Gerotechnology in nursing care practice. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 71(suppl 2), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0365
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donovan, T. (2017). It’s all a game: The history of board games from monopoly to settlers of catan. Thomas Dunne Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dziob, D. (2020). Board game in physics classes—a proposal for a new method of Student assessment. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9714-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elofsson, J., Gustafson, S., Samuelsson, J., & Träff, U. (2016). Playing number board games supports 5-year-old children’s early mathematical development. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Barrios, L., Perfecto, I., & Vandermeer, J. (2016). Azteca chess: Gamifying a complex ecological process of autonomous pest control in shade coffee. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 232, 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, R. (2015). [Online]. Treasure hunter. Queen Games. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/182189/treasure-hunter
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, R., Of Barge, W., & Iezzi, D. (1993). [Online]. Magic: The gathering. Wizards of the Coast. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/463/magic-gathering
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalo-Iglesia, J. L., Lozano-Monterrubio, N., & Prades-Tena, J. (2018). Noneducational board games in university education. Perceptions of students experiencing game-based learning methodologies. Revista Lusofona de Educacao, 41(41), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle41.03
   Google Scholar
• Granerud, A. H. (2016). [Online]. Flamme Rouge. Lautapelit.fi. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/199478/flamme-rouge
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Matthews, J. (2005). [Online]. Twilight struggle. GMT Games. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/12333/twilight-struggle
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix, N. M., Hojnoski, R. L., and Missall, K. N. (2020). Promoting numeracy skills through board game play. Young Exceptional Children, 23(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250618814239
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. S., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., & Olson, I. D. (2012). [Online]. Spinners, dice, and pawns: using board games to prepare for agent-based modeling activities. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (pp. 1–12). https://ccl.northwestern.edu/papers/2012/AERA2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, B. (2018). Teaching history with custom-built board games. Simulation & Gaming, 49(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118763624
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, T.-C., & Liang, Y.-S. (2021). Simultaneously improving computational thinking and foreign language learning: Interdisciplinary media with plugged and unplugged approaches. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(6), 1184–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121992480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias, A., & Bordignon, F. (2019). Introduccion-Pensamiento-Computacional. Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesling, M. (2017). [Online] Azul. Next Move Games. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/230802/azul
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, W.-C., & Hsu, T.-C. (2020). Learning computational thinking without a computer: How computational participation happens in a computational thinking board game. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00479-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leacock, M. (2008). [Online]. Pandemic. Pegasus Spiele. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/30549/pandemic
   Google Scholar
• Leacock, M. (2010). [Online]. Forbidden island. Gamewright. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/65244/forbidden-island
   Google Scholar
• Lim, T., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2015). [Online]. The LM-GM framework for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391–411. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7df0/20237a6d3995860e7345c77dab28e4d0a001.pdf?_ga=2.238872384.1768826724.1559384891-936227403.1559384891%0Ahttps://seriousgamessociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/lmgm_framework.pdf%0Ahttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdo
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linaza, J. L. (2013). [Online]. EL JUEGO ES UN DERECHO Y UNA NECESIDAD DE LA INFANCIA. (Spanish). Play Is for Children Both a Need and a Right (English), 65(1), 103–117. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=fua&AN=85980843&lang=es&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Łodzikowski, K., & Jekiel, M. (2019). Board games for teaching English prosody to advanced EFL learners. ELT Journal, 73(3), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machuqueiro, F., & Piedade, J. (2022). [Online]. Development of computational thinking using board games: A systematic literature review based on empirical studies. Revista Prisma Social, (38), 5–36. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/4766
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Nizam, D. N., & Law, E. L. C. (2018). In the eyes of young children: A study on focused attention to digital educational games. Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, HCI 2018. no. July. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.20
   Google Scholar
• Moon, A. R. (2004). [Online]. Ticket to ride. Days of Wonder. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/9209/ticket-ride
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. D., Hansen, M. T., & Gutierrez, A. (2016). An fMRI study of the impact of block building and board games on spatial ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(AUG), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nieh, H. P., & Wu, W. C. (2018). Effects of a collaborative board game on bullying intervention: A group-randomized controlled trial. Journal of School Health, 88(10), 725–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelikan, A., & Pfister, A. (2015). Isle of Skye: From Chieftain to King. Mayfair Games [Boardgame].
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, C. T. (1997). [Online]. Twilight imperium. Fantasy Flight Games. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/24/twilight-imperium
   Google Scholar
• Pfister, A. (2015). [Online]. Mombasa. Eggertspiele. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/172386/mombasa
   Google Scholar
• Poole, F. J., Clarke-Midura, J., Rasmussen, M., Shehzad, U., & Lee, V. R. (2021). Tabletop games designed to promote computational thinking. Computer Science Education, 32(4), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1947642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimbault, C. (2014). [Online]. Colt express. Ludonaute. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/158899/colt-express
   Google Scholar
• Roubira, J.-L. (2008). [Online]. Dixit. Libellud. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/39856/dixit
   Google Scholar
• Sá, O. (2020). [Online]. Rossio. PYTHAGORAS. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/276633/rossio
   Google Scholar
• Scirea, M., & Valente, A. (2020). Boardgames and Computational Thinking: How to identify games with potential to support CT in the classroom. In PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402942.3409616
   Google Scholar
• Skillen, J., Berner, V. D., & Seitz-Stein, K. (2018). The rule counts! Acquisition of mathematical competencies with a number board game. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1313187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somma, R. (2020). Coding in the Classroom: Why you should care about teaching computer science. No Starch Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, M., & Bernardo, E. (2019). Back in the game modern board games. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1164 CCIS, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37983-4_6
   Google Scholar
• Steinkuehler, C., & Squire, K. (2017). Videogames and learning. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. (pp. 377–394). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taspinar, B., Schmidt, W., & Schuhbauer, H. (2016). Gamification in education: A board game approach to knowledge acquisition. Procedia Computer Science, 99(October), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.104
   Google Scholar
• Teuber, K. (1995). [Online]. Die Siedler von Catan. Kosmos. https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/13/catan
   Google Scholar
• Triboni, E., & Weber, G. (2018). MOL: Developing a European-style board game to teach organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., & Ninaus, M. (2018). Training computational thinking through board games: The case of crabs & turtles. International Journal of Serious Games, 5(2), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v5i2.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C. Y., Doll, J., & Varma, K. (2019). Exploring evidence that board games can support computational thinking. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (pp. 61–64).
   Google Scholar
• Underberg-Goode, N., & Smith, P. (2019). Proceso de Lana: Playing Andean culture through board games. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 10(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1386/CJCS.10.2.161_1
   Google Scholar
• Walker-Harding, P. (2013). Sushi Go! Gamewright [Boardgame].
   Google Scholar
• Wangenheim, C., Medeiros, G., Filho, R., Petri, G., Pinheiro, F., Ferreira, M., & Hauck, J. (2019). Splash code - a board game for learning an understanding of algorithms in middle school. Informatics in Education, 18(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittam, A. M., & Chow, W. (2017). An educational board game for learning and teaching burn care: A preliminary evaluation. Scars Burn Heal, 3, 205951311769001. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513117690012
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4576-8.ch006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonica, P. (2017). [Online]. Learning to evaluate analog games for education. Analog Game Studies, II, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6686720%0Ahttp://press.etc.cmu.edu/index.php/product/analog-game-studies-volume-ii/
   Google Scholar
• Woods, S. (2019). Eurogames: The Design, Culture and Play of Modern European Board Games (Vol. 53, no. 9). McFarland & Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wrede, K.-J. (2000). Carcassone. Hans im Glück [Boardgame].
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. J., Chen, G. D., and Huang, C. W. (2014). Using digital board games for genuine communication in EFL classrooms. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9329-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. Y., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Behavior and cognition processing of educational tabletop coding games. Journal of Internet Technology, 22(2), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.3966/160792642021032202011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagal, J. P., Rick, J., & Hsi, I. (2006). Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878105282279
   Google Scholar