The communicative life of a social carnivore: acoustic repertoire of the ring-tailed coati (Nasua nasua)

References

• Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling Methods. Behav. 49(3):227–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnedo LF, Mendes FD, Strier KB. 2010. Sex differences in vocal patterns in the northern muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus). Am J Primatol. 72(2):122–128. doi:10.1002/ajp.20761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold K, Zuberbühler K. 2006. Language evolution: semantic combinations in primate calls. Nature. 441:303–303. doi:10.1038/441303a.10.1038/441303a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsznov BM, Sakai ST. 2012. The procyonid social club: comparison of brain volumes in the coatimundi (Nasua nasua, N. narica), kinkajou (Potos flavus), and raccoon (Procyon lotor). Brain Behav Evol. 82(2):129–145. doi:10.1159/000354639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvola A. 1974. Vocalization in the guinea-pig (Cavia porcellus). Ann Zool Fenn. 11:1–96.
   Google Scholar
• Barros KS, Tokumaru RS, Pedroza JP, Nogueira SSC. 2011. Vocal repertoire of captive capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris): structure, context and function. Ethology. 117(1):83–94. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01853.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisiegel BM, Mantovani W. 2006. Habitat use, home range and foraging preferences of the coati (Nasua nasua) in a pluvial tropical Atlantic forest area. J Zool. 269:77–87. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00083.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman JC. 1976. Guinea-pig vocalizations: Their structure, causation and function. Ethology. 41(1):80–106. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1976.tb00471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg MS, Sokoloff G. 2001. Do infant rats cry? Psychol Rev. 108:83–95. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.108.1.83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein DT, Armitage KB. 1997. Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: I. The meaning of situationally variable alarm calls. Anim Behav. 53(1):143–171.10.1006/anbe.1996.0285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein DT, Armitage KB. 1998. Why do yellow-bellied marmots call? Anim Behav. 56:1053–1055. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein DT, Recapet C. 2009. The sound of arousal: the addition of novel non-linearities increases responsiveness in marmot alarm calls. Ethology. 115(11):1074–1081.10.1111/eth.2009.115.issue-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt LM, Tennenhouse E. 2017. Contact calling behaviour in the male ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta). Ethology. 123(9):614–626.10.1111/eth.2017.123.issue-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchet H, Blois-Heulin C, Lemasson A. 2013. Social complexity parallels vocal complexity: a comparison of three non-human primate species. Front Psychol. 4:390. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braune P, Schmidt S, Zimmermann E. 2008. Acoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.). BMC Biol. 6(1):19. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charif RA, Waack AM, Strickma LM. 2010. Raven Pro 14. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney DL, Seyfarth R. 1990. How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland J, Snowdon CT. 1982. The complex vocal repertoire of the adult cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 58:231–270. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1982.tb00320.x.
   Google Scholar
• Clucas BA, Freeberg TM, Lucas JR. 2004. Chick-a-dee call syntax, social context, and season affect vocal responses of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 57(2):187–196. doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0847-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton LA. 1998. Acoustical structure of three primary call types of captive white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica). [PhD thesis]. University of Northern Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Compton LA, Clarke JA, Seidensticker J, Ingrisano DR. 2001. Acoustic characteristics of white-nosed coati vocalizations: a test of motivation-structural rules. J Mammal. 82:1054–1058. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<1054:ACOWNC>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa EM. 2009. Preferência alimentar, dispersão de sementes e ecologia comportamental de quatis (Nasua nasua – Procyonidae – Carnivora) em fragmentos de Cerrado, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul. [PhD thesis]. Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul.
   Google Scholar
• Costa EM, Mauro RA, Silva JS. 2009. Group composition and activity patterns of brown-nosed coatis in Savannah fragments, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Braz J Biol. 69:985–991. doi:10.1590/s1519-69842009000500002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Cunha RGT, Byrne RW. 2009. The use of vocal communication in keeping the spatial cohesion of groups: Intentionality and specific functions. In: Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca-Marques JC, Heymann EW, Strier KB, editors. South American primates. New York (NY): Springer; p. 341–363. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78705-3_13.
   Google Scholar
• Déaux ÉC, Charrier I, Clarke JA. 2016. The bark, the howl and the bark-howl: identity cues in dingoes’ multicomponent calls. Behav Proc. 129:94–100.10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digweed SM, Fedigan LM, Rendall D. 2007. Who cares who calls? Selective responses to the lost calls of socially dominant group members in the white-faced capuchin (Cebus Capucinus). Am J Primatol. 69(7):829–835.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg JF. 1974. The function and motivational basis of hystricomorph vocalizations. In: Rowlands IW, Wein BJ, editors. Symposium of the zoological society of London. London: Academic Press; p. 211–247.
   Google Scholar
• Emmons LH, Feer F. 1997. Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmons LH, Whitney BM, Ross DL. 1997. Sounds of neotropical rainforest mammals: an audio field guide. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K. 2002. An overview of the Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) vocal repertoire. Folia Primatol. 73(1):32–45. doi:10.1159/000060417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch WT, Neubauer J, Herzel H. 2002. Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Anim Behav. 63(3):407–418.10.1006/anbe.2001.1912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeberg TM. 2006. Social complexity can drive vocal complexity: group size influences vocal information in Carolina chickadees. Psychol Sci. 17(7):557–561. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01743.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeberg TM, Lucas JR. 2002. Receivers respond differently to chick-a-dee calls varying in note composition in Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Anim Behav. 63:837–845. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeberg TM, Book DL, Jung H, Kyle SC. 2017. Communication, cues, and signals. In: Shackelford TK, Weekes-Shackelford VA, editors. Encyclopaedia of evolutionary psychological science. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2728-1
   Google Scholar
• Gasco ADC, Pérez-Acosta AM, Monticelli PF. 2016. Ring-tailed coatis anointing with soap: a new variation of self-medication culture? Int J Comp Psychol. 29(1). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dq4s4p5.
   Google Scholar
• Gros-Louis JJ, Perry SE, Fichtel C, Wikberg E, Gilkenson H, Wofsy S, Fuentes A. 2008. Vocal repertoire of (Cebus capucinus): acoustic structure, context, and usage. Int J Primatol. 29:641–670. doi:10.1007/s10-008-9263-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustison ML, le Roux A, Bergman TJ. 2012. Derived vocalizations of geladas (Theropithecus gelada) and the evolution of vocal complexity in primates. Philos Trans R Soc. 367:1847–1859. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailman JP. 1994. Constrained permutation in ‘chick-a-dee’-like calls of a black-lored tit Parus xanthogenys. Bioacoustics. 6(1):33–50. doi:10.1080/09524622.1994.9753270.
   Google Scholar
• Hailman JP, Ficken MS. 1986. Combinatorial animal communication with computable syntax: Chick-a-dee calling qualifies as ‘language’ by structural linguistics. Anim Behav. 34(6):1899–1901. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(86)80279-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hailman JP, Ficken MS, Ficken RW. 1985. The ‘chick-a-dee’ calls of Parus atricapillus: a recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English. Semiotica. 56(3–4):191–224. doi:10.1515/semi.1985.56.3-4.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailman JP, Ficken MS, Ficken RW. 1987. Constraints on the structure of combinatorial ‘chick-a-dee’ calls. Ethology. 75:62–80. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00642.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser MD. 1998. Functional referents and acoustic similarity: field playback experiments with rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav. 55(6):1647–1658. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0712.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsch BT. 2007. Within-group spatial position in ring-tailed coatis (Nasua nasua): balancing predation, feeding success, and social competition. [PhD thesis]. Stony Brook University.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch BT. 2011. Long-term adult male sociality in ring-tailed coatis (Nasua nasua). Mammalia. 75:301–304. doi:10.1515/mamm.2011.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch BT, Stanton MA, Maldonado JE. 2012. Kinship shapes affiliative social networks but not aggression in ring-tailed coatis. PLoS ONE. 7:e37301. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu MJ, Chen LM, Agoramoorthy G. 2005. The vocal repertoire of Formosan macaques, (Macaca cyclopis): acoustic structure and behavioral context. Zool Stud Taipei. 44(2):275. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/44.2/275.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen DA, Cant MA, Manser MB. 2012. Segmental concatenation of individual signatures and context cues in banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) close calls. BMC Biol. 10:97.10.1186/1741-7007-10-97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann JH. 1962. The ecology and social behavior of the coati (Nasua narica) of Barro Colorado Island, Panama. [PhD thesis]. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Krams I, Krama T, Freeberg TM, Kullberg C, Lucas JR. 2012. Linking social complexity and vocal complexity: a parid perspective. Philos Trans R Soc B. 367(1597):1879–1891. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingle S, Riede T. 2014. Deer mothers are sensitive to infant distress vocalizations of diverse mammalian species. Am Nat. 184:510–522. doi:10.1086/677677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingle S, Wyman MT, Kotrba R, Teichroeb LJ, Romanow CA. 2012. What makes a cry a cry? a review of infant distress vocalizations. Curr Zool. 58(5):698–726. doi:10.1093/czoolo/58.5.698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas JR, Freeberg TM. 2007. Information and the chick-a-dee call: communicating with a complex vocal system. In: Otter KA, editor. Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach. Oxford University Press on Demand; p. 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Macedonia JM. 1993. The vocal repertoire of the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta). Folia Primatol. 61:186–217. doi:10.1159/000156749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann DA, O’Shea TJ, Nowacek DP. 2006. Nonlinear dynamics in manatee vocalizations. Mar Mammal Sci. 22(3):548–555.10.1111/mms.2006.22.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurello MA, Clarke JA, Ackley RS. 2000. Signature characteristics in contact calls of the white-nosed coati. J Mammal. 81:415–421. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0415:SCICCO>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComb K, Semple S. 2005. Coevolution of vocal communication and sociality in primates. Biol Let. 1:381–385. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes SL, Vielliard JME, de Marco Jr P. 2009. The vocal identity of the Callithrix species (Primates, Callitrichidae). In: Ford SM, Porter LM, Davis LC, editors. The smallest anthropoids. Springer; p. 63–84. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0293-1_3.
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli PF, Ades C. 2011. Bioacoustics of domestication: alarm and courtship calls of wild and domestic cavies. Bioacoustics. 20:169–191. doi:10.1080/09524622.2011.9753642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomer MW, De Farcy DD. 1985. White-faced capuchin (Cebus capucinus) predation on a nestling coati (Nasua narica). J Mammal. 66:185–186. doi:10.2307/1380983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olifiers N, Bianchi RDC, Mourão GDM, Gompper ME. 2009. Construction of arboreal nests by brown-nosed coatis (Nasua nasua) (Carnivora: Procyonidae) in the Brazilian Pantanal. Zoologia. 26:571–574. doi:10.1590/S1984-46702009000300023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottoni EB, Mannu M. 2001. Semifree-ranging tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) spontaneously use tools to crack open nuts. Int J Primatol. 22:347–358. doi:10.1023/A:1010747426841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouattara K, Lemasson A, Zuberbühler K. 2009. Campbell’s monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 106:22026–22031.10.1073/pnas.0908118106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips AV, Stirling I. 2001. Vocal repertoire of South American fur seals, Arctocephalus australis: structure, function, and context. Can J Zool. 79(3):420–437. doi:10.1139/z00-219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro CHR, Sígolo JB. 2006. Metais pesados e a dinâmica lacustre no Parque Ecológico do Tietê - Centro de Lazer Engenheiro Goulart – RMSP. Geologia USP Série Científica, 6:29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Pistorio AL, Vintch B, Wang X. 2006. Acoustic analysis of vocal development in a new world primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). J Acoust Soc Am. 120:1655–1670. doi:10.1121/1.2225899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard KA, Blumstein DT. 2012. Evolving communicative complexity: insights from rodents and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc B. 367:1869–1878. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reháková-Petru M, Policht R, Peške L. 2012. Acoustic repertoire of the Philippine Tarsier (Tarsius syrichta fraterculus) and individual variation of long distance calls. Int J Zool. 2012:1–10. doi:10.1155/2012/602401.
   Google Scholar
• de Resende BD, Mannu M, Izar P, Ottoni EB. 2004. Interaction between capuchins and coatis: nonagonistic behaviors and lack of predation. Int J Primatol. 25:1213–1224. doi:10.1023/B:IJOP.0000043959.12073.bc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riede T, Owren MJ, Arcadi AC. 2004. Nonlinear acoustics in pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Frequency jumps, subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos. Am J Primatol. 64(3):277–291.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JG. 1984. Syntactic structures in the vocalizations of wedge capped capuchin monkeys, Cebus olivaceus. Behaviour. 90(1):46–78. doi:10.1163/156853984X00551.
   Google Scholar
• Romero T, Aureli F. 2008. Reciprocity of support in coatis (Nasua nasua). J Comp Psychol. 122:19. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.1.19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schehka S, Zimmermann E. 2012. Affect intensity in voice recognized by tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). Emotion. 12(3):632–639. doi:10.1037/a0026893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider JN, Anderson RE. 2011. Tonal vocalizations in the red wolf (Canis rufus): potential functions of nonlinear sound production. J Acoust Soc Am. 130:2275–2284. doi:10.1121/1.3628331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HJ. 1980. Behavior of the coati (Nasua narica) in captivity. Carnivore. 3:88–136.
   Google Scholar
• Souza AP, Beisiegel BM. 2002. O comportamento do quati Nasua nasua, em situação de alta densidade populacional. Anais do XX Encontro Anual de Etologia. 304.
   Google Scholar
• Specht R. 2001. Avisoft-SAS Lab Pro (sound analysis and synthesis laboratory). version 4.0. [PhD thesis]. Berlin: Raimund Specht. http://www.avisoft.com/SASLabPro.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Szipl G, Boeckle M, Wascher CAF, Spreafico M, Bugnyar T. 2015. With whom to dine? Ravens’ responses to food-associated calls depend on individual characteristics of the caller. Anim Behav. 99:33–42. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.10.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokuda I, Riede T, Neubauer J, Owren MJ, Herzel H. 2002. Nonlinear analysis of irregular animal vocalizations. J Acoust Soc Am. 111(6):2908–2919.10.1121/1.1474440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend SW, Manser MB. 2011. The function of nonlinear phenomena in meerkat alarm calls. Biol Let. 7(1):47–49.10.1098/rsbl.2010.0537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudgian MA. 1995. A study of captive brown-nosed coatis, Nasua nasua: an ethogram and contact call analysis. [PhD thesis]. Department of Biological Sciences of University of Northern Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson RB, Nowacek DP, Miller PJ. 2007. Nonlinear phenomena in the vocalizations of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) and killer whales (Orcinus orca). J Acoust Soc Am. 122(3):1365–1373.10.1121/1.2756263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzola-Olivio P, Monticelli PF. 2017. The acoustic repertoire of Cavia intermedia as a contribution to the understanding of the Caviidae communication system. Bioacoustics. 26:285–304. doi: 10.1080/09524622.2016.1278401.10.1080/09524622.2016.1278401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volodina EV, Volodin IA, Isaeva IV, Unck C. 2006. Biphonation may function to enhance individual recognition in the dhole, Cuon alpinus. Ethology. 112(8):815–825. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01231.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilden I, Herzel H, Peters G, Tembrock G. 1998. Subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos in mammal vocalization. Bioacoustics. 9(3):171–196. doi:10.1080/09524622.1998.9753394.10.1080/09524622.1998.9753394
   Google Scholar
• Wong J, Stewart PD, Macdonald DW. 1999. Vocal repertoire in the european badger (meles meles): structure, context, and function. J Mammal. 80(2):570–588. doi:10.2307/1383302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar