References
- Adhikerana AS, Slater PJB. 1993. Singing interactions in coal tits, Parus ater: an experimental approach. Anim Behav. 46(6):1205–1211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1311.
- Balsby TJS. 2000. The function of song in whitethroats Sylvia communis. Bioacoustics. 11(1):17–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2000.9753447.
- Balsby TJS, Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB. 2003. Degradation of whitethroat vocalizations: implications for song flight and communication network activities. Behaviour. 140(6):695–719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/156853903322370634.
- Catchpole CK. 1978. Interspecific territorialism and competition in Acrocephalus warblers as revealed by playback experiments in areas of sympatry and allopatry. Anim Behav. 26:1072–1080. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(78)90096-9.
- Catchpole CK, Leisler B. 1988. Interspecific territoriality in Acrocephalus: A reply to Murray’s critical review. Ornis Scandinavica. 19(4):314–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3676728.
- Catchpole CK, Slater PBJ. 1995. Bird song: biological themes and variations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Elfström ST 1979. Display patterns of meadow pipit Anthus pratensis and rock pipit A. spinoletta during the breeding season, a search for behavioural isolating mechanisms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
- Elfström ST. 1990a. Individual and species-specific song patterns of rock and meadow pipits: physical characteristics and experiments. Bioacoustics. 2(4):277–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.1990.9753142.
- Elfström ST. 1990b. Responses of territorial meadow pipits to strange and familiar song phrases in playback experiments. Anim Behav. 40(4):786–788. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80712-2.
- Elfström ST. 1992. Tsip calls of meadow and rock pipits: interspecific comparisons and playback experiments. Anim Behav. 43(5):795–802. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80202-7.
- Elfström ST. 1997. Fighting behaviour and strategy of rock pipit, Anthus petrosus, neighbours: cooperative defence. Anim Behav. 54(3):535–542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0492.
- Elfström ST. 2020. Vocal and visual communication in territorial Rock Pipit males (Anthus petrosus), focused on playback experiments. A study of the information content of displays. Bioacoustics. 29(5):533–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2019.1621775.
- Fallow PM, Gardner JL, Magrath RD. 2011. Sound familiar? Acoustic similarity provokes responses to unfamiliar heterospecific alarm calls. Behav Ecol. 22(2):401–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq221.
- Fisher J. 1954. Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy A, Ford E, editors. Evolution as a process. London: Allen and Unwin; p. 71–83.
- Hurd CR. 1996. Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38(4):287–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050244.
- Kroodsma DE. 1989. Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Anim Behav. 37:600–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90039-0.
- Kroodsma DE, Byers BE, Goodale E, Johnson S, Wan-Chun L. 2001. Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later. Anim Behav. 61(5):1029–1033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1676.
- Linhart P, Fucks R. 2015. Song pitch indicates body size and correlates with males’ response to playback in a songbird. Anim Behav. 103:91–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.038.
- Reichard DG, Anderson RC. 2015. Why signal softly? The structure, function and evolutionary significance of low-amplitude signals. Anim Behav. 105:253–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.017.
- Sandoval L, Méndez C, Mennill DJ. 2013. Different vocal signals, but not prior experience, influence heterospecific from conspecific discrimination. Anim Behav. 85(5):907–915. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.006.