Publication Cover
Bioacoustics
The International Journal of Animal Sound and its Recording
Volume 31, 2022 - Issue 2
243
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reinforced acoustic divergence in two syntopic neotropical treefrogs

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 160-174 | Received 30 Sep 2020, Accepted 24 Feb 2021, Published online: 14 Apr 2021

References

  • Allen WL, Stevens M, Higham JP. 2014. Character displacement of Cercopithecini primate visual signals. Nat Commun. 5(1):1–10.
  • Amézquita A, Hödl W, Lima AP, Castellanos L, Erdtmann L, De Araújo MC. 2006. Masking interference and the evolution of the acoustic communication system of the Amazonian dendrobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Evolution. 60:1874–1887.
  • Bastos RP, Alcantara MB, Morais AR, Lingnau R, Signorelli L. 2011. Vocal behavior and conspecific call response in Scinax centralis (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetol J. 21:43–50.
  • Blair WF. 1974. Character displacement in frogs. Am Zool. 14:1119–1125.
  • Brenowitz EA, Rose GJ. 1994. Behavioural plasticity mediates aggression in choruses of the Pacific treefrog. Anim Behav. 47(3):633–641.
  • Brenowitz EA, Rose GJ. 1999. Female choice and plasticity of male calling behaviour in the Pacific treefrog. Anim Behav. 57(6):1337–1342.
  • Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H. 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Study Behav. 35:151–209.
  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information- theoretic approach. New York (NY): Springer.
  • Caorsi VZ, Both C, Cechin S, Antunes R, Borges-Martins M. 2018. Effects of traffic noise on the calling behavior of two neotropical hylid frogs. PLoS ONE. 13(5):e0197632.
  • Cap H, Deleporte P, Joachim J, Reby D. 2008. Male vocal behavior and phylogeny in deer. Cladistics. 24:917–931.
  • Center for Conservation Bioacoustics. 2014. Raven pro: interactive sound analysis software (Version 1.5) [Computer software]. Ithaca (NY): The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://ravensoundsoftware.com/.
  • Chen Z, Wiens JJ. 2020. The origins of acoustic communication in vertebrates. Nat Commun. 11:369.
  • Conte CE, Rossa-Fere DC. 2007. Riqueza e distribuição espaço-temporal de anuros em um remanescente de floresta de araucária no Sudeste do Paraná. Revista Brasileira De Zoologia. 24(4):1025–1037.
  • Cooley JR. 2007. Decoding asymmetries in reproductive character displacement. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia. 156:89–96.
  • Cooley JR, Marshall DC, Hill KBR, Simon C. 2006. Reconstructing asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in a periodical cicada contact zone. J Evol Biol. 19:855–868.
  • Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
  • Cunnington GM, Fahrig L. 2010. Plasticity in the vocalizations of anurans in response to traffic noise. Acta Oecologica. 36(5):463–470.
  • Delgado DB, Haddad CFB. 2015. Calling activity and vocal repertoire of Hypsiboas prasinus (Anura, Hylidae), a treefrog from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Herpetologica. 71(2):88–95.
  • Fitch WT. 1997. Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J Acoust Soc Am. 102(2):1213–1222.
  • Forti LR, Márquez R, Bertoluci J. 2015. Advertisement call of Dendropsophus microps (Anura: Hylidae) from two populations from southeastern Brazil. Zoologia. 32:187–194.
  • Fox J, Weisberg S. 2019. An {R} companion to applied regression. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/.
  • Frost DR. 2014. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. New York (NY): American Museum of Natural History. Version 6.1. Electronic database. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php
  • Gerhardt HC. 2013. Geographic variation in acoustic communication: reproductive character displacement and speciation. Evol Ecol Res. 15:605–632.
  • Gerhardt HC, Huber F. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
  • Giasson LOM, Haddad CFB. 2006. Social interactions in Hypsiboas albomarginatus (Anura: Hylidae) and the significance of acoustic and visual signals. J Herpetol. 40:171–180.
  • Gingras B, Mohandesan E, Boko D, Fitch WT. 2013. Phylogenetic signal in the acoustic parameters of the advertisement calls of four clades of anurans. BMC Evol Biol. 13:134.
  • Goicoechea N, de la Riva I, Padial JM. 2010. Recovering phylogenetic signal from frog mating calls. Zool Scr. 39(2):141–154.
  • Goin CJ. 1949. The peep order in peepers; a swamp water serenade. Q J Florida Acad Sci. 11:59–61.
  • Grava A, Otter KA, Grava T, LaZerte SE, Poesel A, Rush AC. 2013. Character displacement in dawn chorusing behaviour of sympatric mountain and black-capped chickadees. Anim Behav. 86:177–187.
  • Guimarães LD, Bastos RP. 2003. Vocalizações e interações acústicas em Hyla raniceps (Anura Hylidae) durante a atividade reprodutiva. Iheringia Série Zoologia. 93:149–158.
  • Haddad CF, Toledo LF, Prado CPA, Loebmann D, Gasparini JL, Sazima I. 2013. Guia dos Anfíbios da Mata Atlântica: Diversidade e Biologia. São Paulo (SP): Anolis Books.
  • Haddad CFB 1991. Ecologia reprodutiva de uma comunidade de anfíbios anuros na Serra do Japi, Sudeste do Brasil [dissertation]. Campinas (SP): Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience. 55(3):207–217.
  • Haddad CFB, Sazima I. 1992. Anfíbios anuros da Serra do Japi. In: Morellato LPC, org., editor. História Natural da Serra do Japi: Ecologia e Preservação de uma Área Florestal no Sudeste do Brasil. Campinas (SP): Editora da Unicamp/Fapesp; p. 188–211.
  • Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayak LAC, Foster MS. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for Amphibians. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
  • Höbel G. 2015. Sexual differences in responses to cross-species call interference in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 69:695–705.
  • Höbel G, Gerhardt HC. 2003. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic system of green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution. 57:894–904.
  • Huihua Z, Shuyi Z, Mingxue Z, Jiang Z. 2003. Correlations between call frequency and ear length in bats belonging to the families Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae. J Zool. 259:189–195.
  • Köhler J, Jansen M, Rodríguez A, Kok PJR, Toledo LF, Emmrich M, Glaw F, Haddad CFB, Rödel MO, Vences M. 2017. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa. 4251:001–124.
  • Leitão-Filho H. 1992. A Flora arbórea da Serra do Japi. In: Morellato LPC, org., editor. História Natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e Preservação de uma Área Florestal no Sudeste do Brasil. Campinas (SP): Editora da Unicamp/Fapesp; p. 40–62.
  • Lemes P, Tessarolo G, Morais AR, Bastos RP. 2012. Acoustic repertoire of Barycholos ternetzi (Anura: Strabomantidae) in Central Brazil. South Am J Herpetol. 7(2):157–164.
  • Lemmon EM. 2009. Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution. 63(5):1155–1170.
  • Lingnau R, Bastos RP. 2007. Vocalizations of the Brazilian torrent frog Hylodes heyeri (Anura: Hylodidae): repertoire and influence of air temperature on advertisement call variation. J Nat Hist. 41:1227–1235.
  • Loftus-Hills JJ, Littlejohn MJ. 1992. Reinforcement and reproductive character displacement in Gastrophryne carolinensis and G. olivacea (Anura: Microhylidae): a reexamination. Evolution. 46:896–906.
  • Luther D, Acevedo MA, Montes MIH, Estrada AR, Aide TM. 2010. Is congener abundance related to vocal adjustments that minimize acoustic interference? Caribb J Sci. 46(2–3):150–158.
  • Malone JH, Ribado J, Lemmon EM. 2014. Sensory drive does not explain reproductive character displacement of male acoustic signals in the upland chorus frog (Pseudacris feriarum). Evolution. 68:1306–1319.
  • Marcelino VR. 2009. Distribuição geográfica e variação morfológica em populações do anuro Hypsiboas bischoffi (Anura: Hylidae) [undergraduate thesis]. Rio Claro (SP): Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”.
  • Márquez R, Bosch J. 1995. Advertisement calls of the midwife toads Alytes (Amphibia, Anura, Discoglossidae) in Spain. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 33:185–192.
  • Márquez R, Bosch J. 1997. Male advertisement call and female preference in sympatric and allopatric midwife toads. Anim Behav. 54:1333–1345.
  • Márquez R, de la Riva I, Bosh J. 1993. Advertisement calls of Bolivian species of Hyla (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Biotropica. 25:426–443.
  • Márquez R, Moreira C, Amaral JPS, Pargana JM, Crespo EG. 2005. Sound pressure level of advertisement calls of Hyla merdionalis and Hyla arborea. Amphibia–Reptilia. 26:391–395.
  • Márquez R, Pargana JM, Crespo EG. 2001. Acoustic competition in male Pelodytes ibericus (Anura: Pelodytidae): interactive playback tests. Copeia. 2001(4):1142–1150.
  • Martin JP, Doucet SM, Knox RC, Mennill DJ. 2011. Body size correlates negatively with the frequency of distress calls and songs of neotropical birds. J Field Ornith. 82(3):259–268.
  • Martin WF. 1972. Evolution of vocalizations in the genus Bufo. In: Blair WF, editor. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Austin: University of Texas Press; p. 279–308.
  • Martins IA, Almeida SC, Jim J. 2006. Calling sites and acoustic partitioning in species of the Hyla nana and rubicundula groups (Anura, Hylidae). Herpetol J. 16:239–247.
  • Micancin JP 2008. Acoustic variation and species discrimination in southeastern sibling species, the cricket frogs Acris crepitans and Acris gryllus [dissertation]. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Micancin JP, Wiley RH. 2014. Allometric convergence, acoustic character displacement, and species recognition in the syntopic cricket frogs Acris crepitans and A. gryllus. Evol Biol. 41:425–438.
  • Morais AR, Siqueira MN, Bastos RP. 2015. How do males of Hypsiboas goianus (Hylidae: Anura) respond to conspecific acoustic stimuli? Zoologia. 32(6):431–437.
  • Narins PM, Feng AS, Fay RR, Popper AN. 2007. Hearing and sound communication in amphibians. New York (NY): Springer.
  • Penna M, Hamilton-West C. 2007. Susceptibility of evoked vocal responses to noise exposure in a frog of the temperate austral forest. Anim Behav. 74(1):45–56.
  • Penna M, Pottstock H, Velasquez N. 2005. Effect of natural and synthetic noise on evoked vocal responses in a frog of the temperate austral forest. Anim Behav. 70(3):639–651.
  • Pfennig KS, Pfennig DW. 2009. Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Q Rev Biol. 84(3):253–276.
  • Phelps SM, Rand AS, Ryan MJ. 2007. The mixed-species chorus as public information: túngara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific. Behav Ecol. 18(1):108–114.
  • Pinto HS. 1992. Clima da Serra do Japi. In: Morellato LPC, org., editor. História Natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e Preservação de uma Área Florestal no Sudeste do Brasil. Campinas (SP): Editora da Unicamp/Fapesp; p. 30–38.
  • Pombal JP Jr. 1997. Distribuição espacial e temporal de anuros (Amphibia) em uma poça permanente na Serra de Paranapiacaba, Sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira De Biologia. 57:583–594.
  • Pombal JP Jr. 2010. O espaço acústico em uma taxocenose de anuros (Amphibia) do sudeste do Brasil. Arquivos Do Museu Nacional. 68:135–144.
  • Prado GM, Pombal JP Jr. 2005. Distribuição espacial e temporal dos anuros em um brejo da Reserva Biológica de Duas Bocas, Sudeste do Brasil. Arquivos Do Museu Nacional. 63(4):685–705.
  • R Development Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.
  • Ramer JD, Jenssen TA, Hurst CJ. 1983. Size-related variation in the advertisement call of Rana clamitans (Anura: ranidae), and its effect on conspecific males. Copeia. 1:141–155.
  • Reichert MS, Gerhardt HC. 2013. Socially mediated plasticity in call timing in the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor. Behav Ecol. 24(2):393–401.
  • Ribeiro RS, Egito GTBT, Haddad CFB. 2005. Chave de identificação: anfíbios anuros da vertente de Jundiaí da Serra do Japi, Estado de São Paulo. Biota Neotropica. 5(2):bn03005022005.
  • Richards-Zawacki CL, Cummings ME. 2011. Intraspecific reproductive character displacement in a polymorphic poison dart frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Evolution. 65:259–267.
  • Rossa-Feres DC, Jim J. 2001. Similaridade do sítio de vocalização em uma comunidade de anfíbios anuros na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira De Zoologia. 18(2):439–454.
  • Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W. 1991. Evolution of intraspecific variation in the advertisement call of a cricket frog (Acris crepitans, Hylidae). Biol J Linn Soc. 44:249–271.
  • Schluter D. 2000. Ecological character displacement in adaptive radiation. Am Nat. 156:S4–S16.
  • Schwartz JJ, Wells KD. 1984. Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 14:211–224.
  • Seddon N. 2005. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution. 59(1):200–2015.
  • Smith MJ, Osborne W, Hunter D. 2003. Geographic variation in the advertisement call structure of Litoria verreauxii (Anura: hylidae). Copeia. 4:750–758.
  • Song JJ, Sun RL, Fang K, Zhang BW, Tang YZ, Fang GZ. 2020. Flexibility as a strategy for avoiding call overlap in male Anhui treefrogs. Asian Herpetol Res. 11(3):230–239.
  • Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis C. 2008. Seewave: a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics. 18(2):213–226.
  • Tessarolo G, Maciel NM, Morais AR, Bastos RP. 2016. Geographic variation in advertisement calls among populations of Dendropsophus cruzi (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetol J. 26:219–224.
  • Toledo LF, Haddad CFB. 2005. Acoustic repertoire and calling site of Scinax fuscomarginatus (Anura, Hylidae). J Herpetol. 39(3):455–464.
  • Toledo LF, Llusia D, Vieira CA, Corbo M, Márquez R. 2014b. Neither convergence nor divergence in the advertisement call of sympatric congeneric neotropical treefrogs. Bioacoustics. 24:31–47.
  • Toledo LF, Martins IA, Bruschi DP, Passos MA, Alexandre C, Haddad CFB. 2014a. The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context. Acta Ethologica. 18(2):87–99.
  • Villanueva-Rivera LJ. 2014. Eleutherodactylus frogs show frequency but no temporal partitioning: implications for the acoustic niche hypothesis. PeerJ. 2:e496.
  • Wells KD. 1977. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav. 25:666–693.
  • Wells KD. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
  • Wells KD, Taigen TL, O’ Brien JA. 1996. The effect of temperature on calling energetics of the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer). Amphibia-Reptilia. 17:149–158.
  • Wilkins MR, Seddon NR, Safran RJ. 2013. Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences. Trends Ecol Evol. 28:156–166.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.