References
- Alder TB, Rose GJ. 2000. Integration and recovery processes contribute to the temporal selectivity of neurons in the midbrain of the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens. J Comp Physiol A. 186(10):923–937. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590000144.
- Allan SE, Simmons AM. 1994. Temporal features mediating call recognition in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: amplitude modulation. Anim Behav. 47(5):1073–1086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1146.
- Amézquita A, Flechas SC, Lima AP, Gasser H, Hödl W. 2011. Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatig frogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:17058–17063. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104773108.
- Arak A, Enquist M. 1993. Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Philos Trans R Soc London B. 340:207–213.
- Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 2011. Principles of animal communication. Sunderland (Massachusetts, USA): Sinauer Associates.
- Brzoska J, Schneider H, Nevo E. 1982. Territorial behavior and vocal response in male Hyla arborea Savignyi (Amphibia:anura). Israel J Zool. 31:27–37.
- Bush SL, Gerhardt HC, Schul J. 2002. Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm. Anim Behav. 63(1):7–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1880.
- Capranica RR (1965) The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog. Cambridge (Massachusetts): M.I.T. Press. Research Monograph No. 33.
- Condon CJ, Chang S-H, Feng AS. 1991. Processing of behaviorally relevant temporal parameters of acoustic stimuli by single neurons in the superior olivary nucleus of the leopard frog. J Comp Physiol A. 168(6):709–725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224360.
- Diekamp B, Gerhardt HC. 1995. Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor: behavioral experiments and neurophysiological correlates. J Comp Physiol A. 177(2):173–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225097.
- Erdtmann LK, Simões PI, Mello AC, Lima AP. 2011. Do natural differences in acoustic signals really interfere in conspecific recognition in the pan-Amazonian frog Allobates femoralis? Behaviour. 148:485–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/000579511X565754.
- Gerhardt HC. 1978. Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): the significance of some fine-temporal properties. J Exp Biol. 74:59–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.74.1.59.
- Gerhardt HC. 1991. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav. 42:615–635. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80245-3.
- Gerhardt HC, Doherty JA. 1988. Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications. J Comp Physiol A. 162:261–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606090.
- Gerhardt HC, Huber F. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
- Gooler DM, Feng AS. 1992. Temporal coding in the frog auditory midbrain: the influence of duration and rise-fall time on the processing of complex amplitude-modulated stimuli. J Neurophysiol. 67:1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1992.67.1.1.
- Grafe TU. 1995. Graded aggressive calls in the African painted reed frog Hyperolius marmoratus (Hyperoliidae). Ethology. 101:67–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00346.x.
- Hall JC, Feng AS. 1991. Temporal processing in the dorsal medullary nucleus of the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens pipiens). J Neurophysiol. 66:955–973. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1991.66.3.955.
- Klump GM, Gerhardt HC. 1987. Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray treefrogs. Nat London. 326:286–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/326286a0.
- Laiolo P. 2012. Interspecific interactions drive cultural co-evolution and acoustic convergence in syntopic species. J Anim Ecol. 81: 594-6-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01946.x.
- Lenth R. 2020. Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.4.8 [accessed 2020 Jul 15]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
- Loftus-Hills JJ, Littlejohn MJ. 1971. Pulse repetition rate as the basis for mating call discrimination by two sympatric species of Hyla. Copeia. 1971:154–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1441612.
- Malavasi R, Farina A. 2013. Neighbours’ talk: interspecific choruses among songbirds. Bioacoustics 22:33–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2012.710395.
- Narins PM, Capranica RR. 1978. Communicative significance of the two-note call of the treefrog Eleutherodactylus coqui. J Comp Physiol A. 127:1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611921.
- Narins PM, Capranica RR. 1980. Neural adaptations for processing the two-note call of the Puerto Rican treefrog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. Brain Behav Evol. 17:48–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000121790.
- Pasch B, Bolker BM, Phelps SM. 2013. Interspecific dominance via vocal interactions mediates altitudinal zonation in neotropical singing mice. Am Nat. 182(5):E161–E173. doi:https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v43b8.
- Penna M. 1997. Selectivity of evoked vocal responses in the time domain by frogs of the genus Batrachyla (Leptodactylidae). J Herpetol. 31(2):202–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1565388.
- Penna M. 2005. Voices of Chilean Amphibian (compact disc). Santiago (Chile): Universidad de Chile.
- Penna M, Feng AS, Narins PM. 1997. Temporal selectivity of evoked vocal responses of Batrachyla antartandica (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Anim Behav. 54:833–848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0449.
- Penna M, Lin W-Y, Feng AS. 2001. Temporal selectivity by single neurons in the torus semicircularis of Batrachyla antartandica (Amphibia-Leptodactylidae). J Comp Physiol A. 187:901–912. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-001-0263-9.
- Penna M, Solís R, Corradini P, Moreno-Gómez FN. 2019. Diverse patterns of temporal selectivity in the evoked vocal responses of a frog from the temperate austral forest, Batrachyla taeniata (Batrachylidae). Bioacoustics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2019.1616616
- Penna M, Toloza J. 2014. Vocal responsiveness to interfering sounds by a frog from the southern temperate forest, Batrachyla leptopus. Ethology. 121:26–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12314.
- Penna M, Velásquez N. 2011. Heterospecific vocal interactions in a frog from the southern temperate forest, Batrachyla taeniata. Ethology. 117:63–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01847.x.
- Penna M, Veloso A. 1990. Vocal diversity in frogs of the South American temperate austral forest. J Herpetol. 24:23–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1564285.
- R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Reichert MS, Gerhardt HC. 2014. Behavioral strategies and signaling in interspecific aggressive interactions in gray treefrogs. Behav Ecol. 25:520–530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru016.
- Rose GJ, Capranica RR. 1983. Temporal auditory selectivity in the central auditory system of the leopard frog. Science. 219(4588):1087–1098. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6600522.
- Rose GJ, Capranica RR. 1984. Processing amplitude-modulated sounds by the auditory midbrain of two species of toads: matched temporal filters. J Comp Physiol A. 154(2):211–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00604986.
- Rose GJ, Capranica RR. 1985. Selectivity to amplitude modulated sounds in the anuran auditory system. J Neurophysiol. 53:446–465. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1985.53.2.446.
- Ryan MJ, Rand AS. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution. 47:647–667. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02118.x.
- RyanMJ, CummingsME. 2013. Perceptual biases and mate choice. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 44:21.1–21.23.
- Ryan MJ, Rand W, Hurd PL, Phelps SM, Rand AS. 2003. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals. Am Nat. 161:380–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/367588.
- Schwartz JJ. 1987. The importance of spectral and temporal properties in species and call recognition in a neotropical treefrog with a complex vocal repertoire. Anim Behav. 35:340–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80257-9.
- Schwartz JJ, Wells KD. 1985. Intra- and interspecific vocal behavior of the neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala. Copeia. 1985:27–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1444787.
- Simmons AM. 2013. “To ear is human, to forgive is divine”: Bob Capranica’s legacy to auditory neuroethology. J Comp Physiol A. 199:169–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-012-0786-2.
- Simmons AM, Buxbaum RC, Mirin MP. 1993. Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues. J Comp Physiol A. 173:321–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212696.
- Singmann H, Bolker B, Westfall J, Aust F, Ben-Shachar MS (2020) Afex: analysis of Factorial Experiments. R package version 0.27-2 [accessed 2020 Jul 02]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
- Straughan IR. 1975. An analysis of the mechanisms of mating call discrimination in the frogs Hyla regilla and H. cadaverina. Copeia. 1975:415–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1443638.
- Tobias JA, Planqué R, Cram DL, Seddon N. 2014. Species interactions and the structure of complex communication networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:1020–1025. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314337111.
- Vélez A, Hödl W, Amézquita A. 2012. Sound of silence: call recognition in the temporal domain by the frog Allobates femoralis. Ethology. 118:377–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02021.x.
- Walkowiak W, Brzoska J. 1982. Significance of spectral and temporal call parameters in the auditory communication of male grass frogs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 11:247–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299301.
- Welch AM, Semlitsch RD, Gerhardt HC. 1998. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science. 280:1928–1930. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5371.1928.
- Wells KD. 1989. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: responses of males to graded aggressive calls. Copeia. 1989:461–466. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1445444.
- Wells KD, Schwartz JJ. 2007. The behavioral ecology of anuran communication. In: Narins PM, Feng AS, Fay RR, Popper AN, editors. Hearing and sound communication in amphibians. New York: Springer; p. 44–86.
- Wells KD. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
- Wells KD, Schwartz JJ. 1984. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: aggressive calls. Behaviour 91:128–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/156853984x00254.
- Yang Y, Bicheng Z, Wang J, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J. 2018. A test of the matched filter hypothesis in two sympatric frogs, Chiromantis doriae and Feihyla vittata. Bioacoustics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1482786