References
- Arak A, Eiriksson T. 1992. Choice of singing sites by male bushcrickets (Tettigonia viridissima) in relation to signal propagation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 30:365–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176170.
- Bee MA, Vélez A, Forester JD. 2012. Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 131:4188–4195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3699271.
- Bennet-Clark HC. 1987. The tuned singing burrow of mole crickets. J Exp Biol. 128:383–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.128.1.383.
- Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 2011. Principles of animal communication. 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
- Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H. 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Study Behav. 35:151–209.
- Center for Conservation Bioacoustics. 2014. RavenPro: interactive sound analysis software [computer software]. Version 1.5. Ithaca (NY): The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Available from http://ravensoundsoftware.com/
- Delia J, Bravo-Valencia L, Warkentin KM. 2017. Patterns of parental care in Neotropical glassfrogs: fieldwork alters hypotheses of sex-role evolution. J Evol Biol. 30:898–914.
- Delia J, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Whitney J, Murrieta-Galindo R. 2010. Observations on the reproductive behavior of a Neotropical glassfrog, Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni (Anura: Centrolenidae). South Am J Herpetol. 5:1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.2994/057.005.0101.
- Erregger B, Schmidt AKD. 2018. Anthropogenic calling sites boost the sound amplitude of advertisement calls produced by a tropical cricket. Anim Behav. 142:31–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.021.
- Fasiolo M, Nedellec R, Goude Y, Wood SN. 2018. Scalable visualization methods for modern generalized additive models. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10632.
- Forrest TG. 1994. From sender to receiver: propagation and environmental effects on acoustic signals. Am Zool. 34:644–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/34.6.644.
- Geipel I, Steckel J, Tschapka M, Vanderelst D, Schnitzler HU, Kalko EKV, Peremans H, Simon R. 2019. Bats actively use leaves as specular reflectors to detect acoustically camouflaged prey. Curr Biol. 29:2731–2736.e3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.076.
- Gerhardt HC. 1987. Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Anim Behav. 35:1479–1489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80020-9.
- Gomes DGE, Halfwerk W, Taylor RC, Ryan MJ, Page RA. 2017. Multimodal weighting differences by bats and their prey: probing natural selection pressures on sexually selected traits. Anim Behav. 134:99–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.10.011.
- Greer BJ, Wells KD. 1980. Territorial and reproductive behavior of the tropical American frog Centrolenella fleischmanni. Herpetologica. 36:318–326.
- Marten K, Marler P. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization - I. Temperate habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2:271–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299740.
- Mathevon N, Aubin T, Dabelsteen T. 1996. Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes. Ethology. 102:397–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01135.x.
- McKibben JR, Bass AH. 1998. Behavioral assessment of acoustic parameters relevant to signal recognition and preference in a vocal fish. J Acoust Soc Am. 104:3520–3533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423938.
- Mebs D, Yotsu-Yamashita M, Pogoda W, Vargas Alvarez J, Ernst R, Köhler G, Toennes SW. 2018. Lack of alkaloids and tetrodotoxin in the neotropical frogs Allobates spp. (Aromobatidae) and Silverstoneia flotator (Dendrobatidae). Toxicon. 152:103–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.07.027.
- Mhatre N, Malkin R, Deb R, Balakrishnan R, Robert D. 2017. Tree crickets optimize the acoustics of baffles to exaggerate their mate-attraction signal. Elife. 6:e32763. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32763.
- Morton ES. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat. 109:17–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/282971.
- Muñoz MI, Penna M. 2016. Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows. J Comp Physiol A. 202:473–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1093-0.
- Narins PM, Hurley DD. 1982. The relationship between call intensity and function in the Puerto Rican Coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Herpetologica. 38:287–295.
- Penna M, Moreno-Gómez FN, Muñoz MI, Cisternas J. 2017. Vocal responses of austral forest frogs to amplitude degradation patterns of advertisement calls. Behav Processes. 140:190–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.05.008.
- Poulin B, Lefebvre G, Ibáñez R, Jaramillo C, Hernández C, Rand SA. 2001. Avian predation upon lizards and frogs in a neotropical forest understory. J Trop Ecol. 17:21–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740100102X.
- Prozesky-Schulze L, Prozesky OPM, Anderson F, Van Der Merwe GJJ. 1975. Use of a self-made sound baffle by a tree cricket. Nature. 255:142–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/255142a0.
- R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ .
- Ritschard M, Riebel K, Brumm H. 2010. Female zebra finches prefer high-amplitude song. Anim Behav. 79:877–883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.038.
- Ryan MJ, Kime NM. 2003. Selection on long-distance acoustic signals. In: Simmons AM, Fay RR, Popper AN, editors. Acoustic communication. Springer handbook of auditory research. Vol. 16. New York: Springer; p. 225–274.
- Savage JM. 2002. The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica: a herpetofauna between two continents, between two seas. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
- Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 9:671–675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089.
- Schwartz JJ, Hunce R, Lentine B, Powers K. 2016. Calling site choice and its impact on call degradation and call attractiveness in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 70:1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2016-8.
- Slabbekoorn H. 2004. Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. In: Marler P, Slabbekoorn H, editors. Nature’s music: the science of birdsong. San Diego (CA): Elsevier Academic Press; p. 178–205.
- Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis C. 2008. Equipment review: seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics. 18:213–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2008.9753600.
- Tuttle MD, Ryan MJ. 1981. Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the Neotropics. Science. 214:677–678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.214.4521.677.
- Wells KD, Schwartz JJ. 1982. The effect of vegetation on the propagation of calls in the Neotropical frog Centrolenella fleischmanni. Herpetologica. 38:449–455.
- Wiley RH, Richards DG. 1978. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 3:69–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300047.
- Wood SN. 2011. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 73:3–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x.