What do we know about advertisement calls of Mexican anurans? A bibliographic review

References

• Abramo G, D’Angelo CA. 2015. The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: evidence from Italy. J Informetr. 9(4):746–761. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aceves-Bueno E, Adeleye AS, Ferayd M, Huang Y, Mengya T, Yang Y, Anderson SE. 2017. The accuracy of citizen science data: a quantitative review. Bull Ecol Soc Am Soc Am. 98(4):1–23. doi: 10.1002/bes2.1336.
   Google Scholar
• Amézquita A, Lima AP, Jehle R, Castellanos L, Ramos Ó, Crawford AJ, Gasser H, Hödl W. 2009. Calls, colours, shape, and genes: a multi-trait approach to the study of geographic variation in the Amazonian frog Allobates femoralis. Biol J Linn Soc. 98(4):826–838. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01324.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristeidou M, Herodotou C, Ballard HL, Higgins L, Johnson RF, Miller AE, Young AN, Robinson LD. 2021. How do young community and citizen science volunteers support scientific research on biodiversity? The case of iNaturalist. Diversity. 13(318). doi: 10.3390/d13070318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Augusto-Alves G, Dena S, Felipe Toledo L, Toledo LF. 2021. Acoustic allometry, background stream noise and its relationship with large-bodied and voiceless rheophilic frogs. Zool Anz. 295:156–162. [accessed 2021 Oct 28]. doi: 10.1016/j.jcz.2021.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baethge C. 2008. Publish together or perish. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 1948(9):380–383. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0380.
   Google Scholar
• Beebee TJC, Griffiths RA. 2005. The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology? Biol Conserv. 125(3):271–285. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal XE, Guarnizo C, Lüddecke H. 2005. Geographic variation in advertisement call and genetic structure of Colostethus palmatus (Anura, Dendrobatidae) from the Colombian Andes. Herpetol. 61(4):395–408. doi: 10.1655/04-87.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair FW. 1958. Mating call in the speciation of anuran amphibians. Am Nat. XCII(862):27–51. doi: 10.1086/282007.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Moheno M, Aide TM. 2020. Beyond deforestation: land cover transitions in Mexico. Agric Syst. 178(September 2019):102734. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102734.
   Google Scholar
• Both C, Grant T. 2012. Biological invasions and the acoustic niche: the effect of bullfrog calls on the acoustic signals of white-banded tree frogs. Biol Lett. 8(5):714–716. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd SK, Emerson SB. 1999. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms. Brain Behav Evol. 53(4):187–197. doi: 10.1159/000006594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 2011. Principles of Animal Communication. 2nd ed. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg AN. 1940. Observations on the ecology and natural history of Anura. I. Habits, habitat and breeding of Bufo cognatus Say. Am Nat. 74(753):322–349. doi: 10.1086/280900.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie S, Yasumiba K, Towsey M, Roe P, Schwarzkopf L. 2021. Acoustic monitoring reveals year-round calling by invasive toads in tropical Australia. Bioacoustics. 30(2):125–141. doi: 10.1080/09524622.2019.1705183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budney GF, Mcquay W, Webster MS. 2014. Transitioning the largest archive of animal sounds from analogue to digital. J Digit Media Manag. 2(3):212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan CT, Poore AGB, Mesaglio T, Moles AT, Nakagawa S, Roberts C, Rowley JJL, Vergés A, Wilshire JH, Cornwell WK. 2021. Three frontiers for the future of biodiversity research using citizen science data. Bioscience. 71(1):55–63. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaa131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos-Cerqueira M, Aide TM, Jones K. 2016. Improving distribution data of threatened species by combining acoustic monitoring and occupancy modelling. Methods Ecol Evol. 7(11):1340–1348. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canseco-Márquez L, Aguilar-López JL, Luría-Manzano R, Pineda E, Caviedes-Solís IW. 2017. A new species of treefrog of the genus Ptychohyla (Anura: Hylidae) from Southern Mexico. Zootaxa. 4317(2):279–290. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.2.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Wiens JJ. 2020. The origins of acoustic communication in vertebrates. Nat Commun. 11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14356-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens J, Aufderheide J, Ronacher B. 2017. Relative weighting of acoustic information during mating decisions in grasshoppers indicates signatures of sexual selection. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens, Neural, Behav Physiol. 203(11):891–901. doi: 10.1007/s00359-017-1200-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Torre-Loranca MA, Martínez-Fuentes RG, Canseco-Márquez L, García-Vázquez UO. 2020. New records of amphibians and reptiles from Sierra de Zongolica, Veracruz and Puebla, Mexico. Herpetol Rev. 51(3):550–553.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva S, Wijayathilaka N. 2019. Bioacoustics of Sri Lankan amphibians: a review of current knowledge and conservation significance. J Trop For Environ. 9(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dena S, Rebouças R, Augusto-Alves G, Zornosa-Torres C, Pontes MR, Toledo LF. 2019. How much are we losing in not depositing anuran sound recordings in scientific collections? Bioacoustics. 29(5):1–12. doi: 10.1080/09524622.2019.1633567.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, Phillips T, Purcell K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front Ecol Environ. 10(6):291–297. doi: 10.1890/110236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distel CA. 2020. Increasing diversity and inclusivity in herpetology: small but critical steps from the editors of herpetological journals. Herpetol Rev. 51(4):765–766.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher CE, Pröhl H. 2014. Multiple sexual signals: calls over colors for mate attraction in an aposematic, color-diverse poison frog. Frontiers Ecol Evol. 2(22):1–10. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2014.00022.
   Google Scholar
• Duellman WE. 1970. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America. 1st ed. Kansas. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.2835.
   Google Scholar
• Emmrich M, Vences M, Ernst R, Köhler J, Barej MF, Glaw F, Jansen M, Rödel-Oliver M, Rödel MO. 2020. A guild classification system proposed for anuran advertisement calls. Zoosyst Evol. 96(2):515–525. doi: 10.3897/zse.96.38770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira LM, Oliveira EG, Lopes LC, Brito MR, Baumgarten J, Rodrigues FH, Sousa-Lima RS. 2018. What do insects, anurans, birds, and mammals have to say about soundscape indices in a tropical savanna. J Ecoacoustics. 2(1):1–17. doi: 10.22261/jea.pvh6yz.
   Google Scholar
• Forti LR, Hepp F, de Souza JM, Protazio A, Szabo JK. 2022. Climate drives anuran breeding phenology in a continental perspective as revealed by citizen-collected data. Divers Distrib. 28(10):2094–2109. doi: 10.1111/ddi.13610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frías-Alvarez P, Zúñiga-Vega JJ, Flores-Villela O. 2010. A general assessment of the conservation status and decline trends of Mexican amphibians. Biodivers Conserv. 19(13):3699–3742. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9923-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost DR. 2021. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.1. Electron Database Access. [accessed 2021 Apr 8]. http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/.
   Google Scholar
• Gazni A, Sugimoto CR, Didegah F. 2012. Mapping world scientific collaboration: authors, institutions, and countries. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 63(2):323–335. doi: 10.1002/asi.21688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goicoechea N, De La Riva I, Padial JM. 2010. Recovering phylogenetic signal from frog mating calls. Zool Scr. 39(2):141–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2009.00413.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosso J, Fratani J, Fontanarrosa G, Chuliver M, Duport-Bru AS, Schneider RG, Casagranda MD, Ferraro DP, Vicente N, Salica MJ, et al. 2021. Male homophily in South American herpetology: one of the major processes underlying the gender gap in publications. Amphib Reptil. 42(4):407–418. doi: 10.1163/15685381-bja10063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünwald CI, Ahumada-Carrillo T, Gründwald AJ, Montaño-Ruvalcaba CE, García-Vázquez UO. 2021. A new species of Geophis (Dipsadidae) from Veracruz, Mexico, with comments on the validity of related taxa. Amphib Reptile Conserv. 15(2):289–310(e294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünwald CI, Reyes-Velasco J, Franz-Chávez H, Morales-Flores KI, Ahumada-Carrillo IT, Jones JM, Boissinot S. 2018. Six new species of Eleutherodactylus (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae: subgenus Syrrhophus) from Mexico, with a discussion of their systematic relationships and the validity of related species. Mesoam Herpetol. 5(1):7–83. www.mesoamericanherpetology.com.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra V, Llusia D, Guedes Gambale P, Ribeiro De Morais A, Márquez R, Pereira Bastos R. 2018. The advertisement calls of Brazilian anurans: historical review, current knowledge and future directions. PLoS One. 13(1):1–22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Herrera CI, Pérez-Mendoza HA. 2021. Acoustic and morphological variation on two populations of Dryophytes arenicolor in central Mexico. Bioacoustics. 30(3):366–377. doi: 10.1080/09524622.2020.1760937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones G. 1997. Acoustic signals and speciation: the roles of natural and sexual selection in the evolution of Cryptic species. Adv Study Behav. 26(C):317–354. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60383-6.
   Google Scholar
• Juárez-Ramírez MC, Aguilar-López JL, Pineda E. 2016. Protected natural areas and the conservation of amphibians in a highly transformed mountainous region in Mexico. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 11(1):19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley DB. 2004. Vocal communication in frogs. This review comes from a themed issue on neurobiology of behaviour. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 14:751–757. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kight CRC, Swaddle JPJ. 2015. Eastern bluebirds alter their song in response to anthropogenic changes in the acoustic environment. Integr Comp Biol. 55(3):418–431. doi: 10.1093/icb/icv070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler J, Jansen M, Rodríguez A, Kok PJR, Toledo LF, Emmrich M, Glaw F, Haddad CFB, Rödel MO, Vences M. 2017. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa. 4251(1):1. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4251.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmala M, Wiggins A, Swanson A, Simmons B. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Front Ecol Environ. 14(10):551–560. doi: 10.1002/fee.1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiolo P. 2010. The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biol Conserv. 143(7):1635–1645. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebenger L. 2015. Citizen science: creating an inclusive network for conservation. Guard. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jan/07/citizen-science-creating-an-inclusive-global-network-for-conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros CI, Both C, Grant T, Hartz SM. 2017. Invasion of the acoustic niche: variable responses by native species to invasive American bullfrog calls. Biol Invasions. 19(2):675–690. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1327-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Henao AM, Ordóñez-Flores S, Dena S, Toledo LF, Guayasamin MJ, Franco Mena D, Acevedo-Charry O. 2021. A call for calls: acoustic repositories based in Latin America. Rev Latinoam Herpetol. 4(02):7–22. doi: 10.22201/fc.25942158e.2021.02.322.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SL, Bicknell JE, Edwards DP, Deere NJ, Bernard H, Davies ZG, Struebig MJ. 2020. Spatial replication and habitat context matters for assessments of tropical biodiversity using acoustic indices. Ecol Indic. 119:106717. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz Santos I. 2020. Revisión bibliográfica del estado del conocimiento bioacústico de los anfibios anuros de México. Mexico: Instituto Politécnico Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson D, Klinck H, Carbaugh-Rutland A, Mathis C, Morzillo A, Garcia T. 2017. Calling at the highway: the spatiotemporal constraint of road noise on Pacific chorus frog communication. Ecol Evol. 7(1):429–440. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa-Ochoa L, Urbina-Cardona JN, Vázquez LB, Flores-Villela O, Bezaury-Creel J, Rands S. 2009. The effects of governmental protected areas and social initiatives for land protection on the conservation of Mexican amphibians. PLoS One. 4(9):1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Campbell JA, Flores-Villela OA. 2014. Patterns of richness and endemism of the Mexican herpetofauna, a matter of spatial scale? Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 111(2):305–316. doi: 10.1111/bij.12201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Rodríguez P, Mora F, Flores-Villela O, Whittaker RJ. 2012. Climate change and amphibian diversity patterns in Mexico. Biol Conserv. 150(1):94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmer ME, Robertson JM, Zamudio KR. 2009. Discordance in body size, colour pattern, and advertisement call across genetically distinct populations in a Neotropical anuran (Dendropsophus ebraccatus). Biol J Linn Soc. 97(2):298–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01210.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva MV, Kaiser K, Robertson JM, Gray DA, Hebets E. 2018. Call recognition and female choice in a treefrog with a multicomponent call. Ethol. 124(5):331–337. doi: 10.1111/eth.12736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina OE, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Corrada-Bravo CJ, Mitchell Aide T. 2013. Variable response of anuran calling activity to daily precipitation and temperature: implications for climate change. Ecosphere. 4(4):1–12. doi: 10.1890/ES12-00258.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padial JM, Köhler J, Muñoz A, De La Riva I. 2008. Assessing the taxonomic status of tropical frogs through bioacoustics: geographical variation in the advertisement calls in the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Anura). Zool J Linn Soc. 152(2):353–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00341.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penone C, Le Viol I, Pellissier V, Julien JF, Bas Y, Kerbiriou C. 2013. Use of large-scale acoustic monitoring to assess anthropogenic pressures on Orthoptera communities. Conserv Biol. 27(5):979–987. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pernat N, Kampen H, Jeschke JM, Werner D, Wiersma Y. 2021. Citizen science versus professional data collection: comparison of approaches to mosquito monitoring in Germany. J Appl Ecol. 58(2):214–223. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin R, Presswell B. 2016. Taxonomic quality of species descriptions varies over time and with the number of authors, but unevenly among parasitic taxa. Syst Biol. 65(6):1107–1116. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Correa M, Ospina-L AM, Rojas-Montoya M, Venegas-Valencia K, Rueda-Solano LA, Gutiérrez-Cárdenas PDA, Vargas-Salinas F. 2021. Cantos de las ranas y los sapos de Colombia: estado actual del conocimiento y perspectivas de investigación en ecoacústica. Neotrop Biodivers. 7(1):352–365. doi: 10.1080/23766808.2021.1957651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Cabrera TM, García-Padrón LY, Galvis ARA, De Sá RO, Bosch RA. 2018. First record of the genus Leptodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Cuba: Leptodactylus fragilis, a biological invasion? J Nat Hist. 52(29–30):1883–1892. doi: 10.1080/00222933.2018.1498549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Tejeda RE, Méndez-Cárdenas MG, Islas-Villanueva V, Garcia CM. 2014. Geographic variation in the advertisement calls of Hyla eximia and its possible explanations. PeerJ. 2(1):e420. doi: 10.7717/peerj.420.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sá ROD, Grant T, Camargo A, Heyer WR, Ponssa ML, Stanley E. 2014. Systematics of the neotropical genus Leptodactylus fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae): phylogeny, the relevance of non-molecular evidence, and species accounts. South Am J Herpetol. 9(s1):SS1–SS100. doi: 10.2994/SAJH-D-13-00022.1.
   Google Scholar
• Salerno PE, Nica Pá Ez-Vacas M, Guayasamin JM, Stynoskiid JL, Dorta-González P. 2019. Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology. PLoS One. 14(6):e0218598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindel DE, Cook JA. 2018. The next generation of natural history collections. PLoS Biol. 16(7):1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider H, Sinsch U. 2007. Amphibian biology: contributions of bioacoustics to the taxonomy of the anura. In: Heatwole H, editor. Amphibian Biology. i‒xiv. Chipping Norton, New South Wales: Surrey Beatth & Sons; p. 2407–2962. papers3://publication/uuid/302734E6-A031-4F2C-A284-56CCE2A84C95.
   Google Scholar
• Seltzer C. 2019. Making biodiversity data social, shareable, and scalable: reflections on iNaturalist & citizen science. Biodivers Inf Sci Stand. 3. doi: 10.3897/biss.3.46670.
   Google Scholar
• SEMARNAT [Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales]. 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059- SEMARNAT -2010: Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de Mé- xico de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo.
   Google Scholar
• Smith WH, Slemp SL, Stanley CD, Blackburn MN, Wyland J. 2015. Combining citizen science with traditional biotic surveys to enhance knowledge regarding the natural history of secretive species: notes on the geographic distribution and status of the green salamander. IRCF Reptil Amphib Conserv Nat Hist. 22(4):135–144. doi: 10.17161/randa.v22i4.14066.
   Google Scholar
• Spear DM, Pauly GB, Kaiser K. 2017. Citizen science as a tool for augmenting museum collection data from urban areas. Front Ecol Evol. 5(86):1–12. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00086.
   Google Scholar
• Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Ribeiro JW, Llusia D. 2019. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience. 69(1):5–11. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biy147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo, Martins IA, Bruschi DP, Passos MA, Alexandre C, Haddad CFB, Toledo LF. 2015. The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context. Acta Ethol. 18(2):87–99. doi: 10.1007/s10211-014-0194-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo, Tipp C, Márquez R, Tipp C. 2015. The value of audiovisual archives. Science. 347(6221):484. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6221.484-b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa JS, Aubin T, Llusia D, Courtois ÉA, Fouquet A, Gaucher P, Pavoine S, Sueur J. 2019. Explosive breeding in tropical anurans: environmental triggers, community composition and acoustic structure. BMC Ecol. 19(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12898-019-0243-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vega-Hidalgo Á, Flatt E, Whitworth A, Symes L. 2021. Acoustic assessment of experimental reforestation in a Costa Rican rainforest. Ecol Indic. 133(108313):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413.
   Google Scholar
• Velásquez NA, Marambio J, Brunetti E, Méndez MA, Vásquez RA, Penna M. 2013. Bioacoustic and genetic divergence in a frog with a wide geographical distribution. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 110:142–155. https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/110/1/142/2415752.110.1111/bij.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver SJ, Callaghan CT, Rowley JJL. 2020. Anuran accents: continental-scale citizen science data reveal spatial and temporal patterns of call variability. Ecol Evol. 10(21):12115–12128. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 1977. The courtship of frogs. In: Taylor DH Guttman S, editors. The reproductive biology of amphibians. Boston, MA: Springer US; p. 233–262. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6781-0_7.
   Google Scholar
• Williams BR, Mcafee D, Connell SD. 2021. Repairing recruitment processes with sound technology to accelerate habitat restoration. Ecol Appl. 31(6):e02386, 1–7. doi: 10.1002/eap.2386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip DA, Knight EC, Haave-Audet E, Wilson SJ, Charchuk C, Scott CD, Sólymos P, Bayne EM, Rowcliffe M, Quick N. 2020. Sound level measurements from audio recordings provide objective distance estimates for distance sampling wildlife populations. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. 6(3):301–315. doi: 10.1002/RSE2.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamudio-Torres TV, Fuentes-De la Rosa DL, Ordóñez-Flores S. 2020. La colección de sonidos de anuros del Museo de Zoología “Alfonso L. Herrera”de la Facultad de Ciencias. UNAM, Rev Latinoam Herpetol. 3(1):132–140. doi: 10.22201/fc.25942158e.2020.1.151.
   Google Scholar
• Znidersic E, Watson DM. 2022. Acoustic restoration: Using soundscapes to benchmark and fast‐track recovery of ecological communities. Ecol Lett. 25(7):1597–1603. doi: 10.1111/ele.14015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zornosa-Torres C, Toledo LF. 2019. Courtship behavior and advertisement call geographic variation of Bokermannohyla luctuosa (Pombal Jr. and Haddad, 1993) (Hylidae, Cophomantini). S Am J Herpetol. 14(1):71–79. doi: 10.2994/SAJH-D-16-00057.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar