Rough set-based approach for automated discovery of censored production rules

REFERENCES

• Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., & Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. Proceedings of the 1993 ACM's Special Interest Group on Management of Data, 22(2), 805–810.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In J. B.Bocca, M.Jarke & C.Zaniolo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference on very large databases (pp. 487–499). Santiago de Chile: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Baqui, S., Just, J., & Baqui, S. C. (2009). Deriving strong association rules using a dependency criterion, the lift measure. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, 1(3), 297–312.
   Google Scholar
• Berzal, F., Blanco, I., Sanchez, D., & Vila, M. A. (2001). A new framework to assess association rules. Proceedings advances intelligent data analysis, 4th international symposiumLecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2189, (pp. 95–104). Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, K. K., & Jain, N. K. (1992). Hierarchical censored production rules (HAPRs) system. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 8, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, Z., & Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2008). Vagueness and roughness. Transactions on rough sets-IX, Vol. 5390, (pp. 1–13). Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bullard, L. A., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Gao, K. (2007). An application of a rule-based model in software quality classification. Proceedings of international conference on machine learning (ICML'2007) (pp. 204–210). Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1990). Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. International Journal of General Systems, 17, 191–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emilyn, J., & Ramar, K. (2010). Rough set based clustering of gene expression data: A survey. International Journal of Engineering Science & Technology, 2(12), 7160–7164.
   Google Scholar
• Fajriya Hakim, R. B., Seno, S., & Winarko, E. (2010). Clustering binary data based on rough set indiscernibility level. Biomedical Soft Computing and Human Sciences, 16(2), 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gomolinska, A. (2010). Satisfiability judgement under incomplete information. Transactions on Rough Sets-XI, 5946, 66–91.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, J. W. (2008). Three approaches to missing attribute values: A rough set perspective. Data mining: Foundations and practiceStudies in computational intelligence, Vol. 118, (pp. 139–152). Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, J. W. (2010). Mining numerical data – a rough set approach. Transactions on Rough Sets-XI, 5946, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, J. W., & Grzymala-Busse, W. J. (2007). An experimental comparison of three rough set approaches to missing attribute values. Transactions on Rough Sets, 6, 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, J. W., & Yao, Y. (2008). A comparison of the LERS classification system and rule management in PRSM. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC'2008) , Ohio, USALecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 5306, (pp. 139–152). Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway, P. (1987). A variable precision logic inference system employing the Dempster-Shafer uncertainty calculus (MS thesis (UILU-ENG-86-/777)). University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., Pei, J., Yin, Y., & Mao, R. (2004). Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8, 53–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanien, A. E., Suraj, Z., Slezak, D., & Lingras, P. (2008). Rough computing. Theories, technologies, and applicationsSeries: in memoriam Professor Zdzislaw Pawlak. New York: IGI Global Hershey.
   Google Scholar
• Herawan, T., Ghazali, R., Yanto, I. T. R., & Deris, M. M. (2010). Rough set approach for categorical data clustering. International Journal of Database Theory and Application, 3(1), 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, Y. H. (2008). Improving classification accuracy of IC packaging products database based on variable precision rough sets. Information Technology Journal, 7(3), 440–449.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, W. (2008). Rule induction: Combining rough set and statistical approaches. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC'2008) Ohio, USALecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 5306, (pp. 170–180)
   Google Scholar
• Kryszkiewicz, M. (1998). Rough set approach to incomplete information systems. Journal of Information Sciences, 112, 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., & Zhang, W. (2006). Gene selection using rough set theory. Proceedings of 1st international conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (RSKT 2006) (pp. 778–785). Chongqing: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Cercone, N. (2005). Discovering and ranking important rules. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on granular computing (pp. 506–511). Beijing,China: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Cercone, N. (2006). Introducing a rule importance measure. Transactions on Rough Sets, 5, 167–189.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Pattaraintakorn, P., & Cercone, V. (2007). Rule evaluations, attributes, and rough sets: Extension and a case study. Transactions on rough sets VI: Commemorating life and work of Zdislaw Pawlak, Part ILNCS, Vol. 4374, (pp. 152–171). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, J., & Xu, Z. (2002). The algorithm on knowledge reduction in incomplete information systems. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(1), 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingras, P. J., & Yao, Y. (1998). Data mining using extensions of the rough set model. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 49, 415–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Hu, P., & Jiang, C. (2008). The incremental learning methodology of VPRS based on complete information system. Proceedings of the third international conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (RSKT'2008) Chengdu, ChinaLecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 5009, (pp. 276–283). Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan, P., Kandwal, R., & Vijay, R. (2011). General framework for cluster based active learning algorithm. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE), 3(1), 307–312.
   Google Scholar
• Michalski, R. S., & Winston, P. H. (1986). Variable precision logic. Artificial Intelligence, 29, 121–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. S. (2002). Scalable classification method based on rough sets. Proceedings of Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2002)Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2475, (pp. 433–440). Malvern, PA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 2, 341–356.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z. (1985). Rough sets and fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 99–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z. (1991). Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z., Grzymala-Busse, J. W., Slowinski, R., & Ziarko, W. (1995). Rough sets. Communications of ACM, 38(11), 89–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkowski, L. (2003). Rough sets', mathematical foundation. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Predki, B., Slowinski, R., Stefanowski, J., Susmaga, R., & Wilk, Sz. (1998). ROSE. Software implementation of the rough set theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1424, 605–608.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H., Yang, S., & Liu, J. (2010). On attribute reduction of rough set based on pruning rules. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Rough Set and Knowledge Technology (RSKT'10) (pp. 86–93). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Skowron, A., & Stepaniuk, J. (1992). Intelligent systems based on rough set approach. Proceedings of the international workshop rough sets: State of the art and perspectives Extended Abstracts (pp. 62–64). Poland: Kiekrz-Poznan.
   Google Scholar
• Skoworon, A., & Stepanuik, J. (1995). Generalized approximation spaces. In T. Y.Lin & A. M.Wildberger (Eds.), Soft computing (pp. 18–21). San Diego, CA: The Society for Computer Simulation.
   Google Scholar
• Slezak, D., & Widz, S. (2010). Is it important which rough-set-based classifier extraction and voting criteria are applied together? In M.Szczuka et al. (Eds.), RSCTC 2010, LNAI, 6086 (pp. 187–196). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Slezak, D., & Widz, S. (2011). Rough-set-inspired feature subset selection, classifier construction, and rule aggregation. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (RSKT 2011) (pp. 81–88). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Slowinski, R. (Ed.). (1992). Intelligent decision support: Handbook of applications and advances of the rough sets theory. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Tsumoto, S. (2011a). A new framework for incremental rule induction based on rough sets. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on granular computing (pp. 681–686). Kaohsiung: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Tsumoto, S. (2011b). Incremental rule induction based on rough set theory. Foundations of intelligent systems – 19th international symposium. Warsaw: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tsumoto, S. (2011c). Rule induction methods with hierarchical sampling. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing, ICCI*CC 2011 (pp. 193–202). Banff: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., & Yang, L. (2006). Study of cluster algorithm based on rough sets theory. Proceeding of the sixth international conference on Intelligent System Design & Application (ISDA'06) (pp. 492–496). Washington: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. Y. (1995). On combining rough and fuzzy sets. In T. Y.Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the CSC'95 workshop on rough sets and database mining (pp. 165–172). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: San Jose State University.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. Y. (2007). A note on definability and approximations. Transactions on Rough Sets VII, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4400, 274–282.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. Y. (2009). Interpreting concept learning in cognitive informatics and granular computing. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, B, 39, 855–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. Y. (2010). Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Information Sciences, 180(3), 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. Y., Li, X., Lin, T. Y., & Liu, Q. (1995). Representation and classification of rough set models. Soft computing: Rough sets, fuzzy logic, neural network, uncertainty management and knowledge discovery (pp. 44–47), San Diego, CA: Society of Computer Simulation.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. Y., Wong, S. K. M., & Lin, T. Y. (1997). A review of rough set models'. In T. Y.Lin & N.Cercone (Eds.), Proceedings of rough sets and data mining: Analysis for imprecise data (pp. 47–75). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Zaki, M. J. (2000). Scalable algorithms for association mining. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge Data Engineering, 12(3), 372–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziarko, W. P. (Ed.). (1994). Rough sets, fuzzy sets and knowledge discovery (RSKD'93), workshops in computing. London and Berlin: Springer-Verlag and British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar