References
- Bedau, M. (2008). Is weak emergentism just in mind?Minds & Machines, 18, 443–459.
- Floridi, L. (2008). The method of levels of abstraction. Minds & Machines, 18, 303–329.
- Floridi, L. (2009). Against digital ontology. Synthese, 168, 151–178.
- Floridi, L. (2011a). A defence of constructionism: Philosophy as conceptual engineering. Metaphilosophy, 42, 282–304.
- Floridi, L. (2011b). The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Godfrey-Smith, P. (2006). The strategy of model-based science. Biology & Philosophy, 21, 725–740.
- Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kim, J. (1993). The nonreductivist's troubles with mental causation. In J.Heile & A.Mele (Eds.), Mental causation (pp. 189–210). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36.
- Kim, J. (2002). The layered model: Metaphysical considerations. Philosophical Explorations, 5, 2–20.
- Kim, J. (2006). Emergence: Core ideas and issues. Synthese, 151, 547–559.
- Morgan, C. L. (1923). Emergent evolution (Vol. 34). London: Williams and Norgate.
- Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Ronald, E. M. A., Sipper, M., & Capcarrère, M. S. (1999). Design, observation, surprise! A test of emergence. Artificial Life, 5, 225–239.
- Silberstein, M., & McGeever, J. (1999). The search for ontological emergence. Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 182–200.
- Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.