Taking the fifth amendment in Turing’s imitation game

References

• Bourke, J. (2011). What it means to be Human: Reflections from 1791 to the present. London: Virago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, B. J. (2004). The essential Turing — The ideas that gave birth to the computer age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genova, J. (1994). Turing's sexual guessing game. Social Epistemology, 8, 313–326.10.1080/02691729408578758
   Google Scholar
• Harnad, S. (2014, June 10). Turing testing and the game of life: Cognitive science is about designing lifelong performance capacity not short-term fooling. LSE Impact Blog 6/10. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/06/10/turing-testing-and-the-game-of-life/
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, P., & Ford, K. (1995). Turing test considered harmful. In Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 972–977). Montreal: Morgan Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, A. (2010). Fair play for machines. Kybernetes, 39, 441–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassègue, J. (1996). What kind of Turing test did Turing have in mind? Tekhnema 3/A Touch of memory, Spring. Retrieved from http://tekhnema.free.fr/3Lasseguearticle.htm
   Google Scholar
• Moor, J. H. (2003). The status and future of the Turing test. In J. H. Moor (Ed.), The Turing test – The elusive standard of artificial intelligence (pp. 197–214). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H. (2011). Deception detection and machine intelligence in practical Turing tests ( PhD thesis), The University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H. (2013). Conversation, deception and intelligence: Turing’s question-answer game. In S. B. Cooper & J. van Leeuwen (Eds.), Alan Turing: His life and impact. Part III building a brain: Intelligent machines, practice and theory (pp. 614–620). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H., & Henry, O. (2005, May 11–14) Confederate effect in human-machine textual interaction. In Proceedings of 5th WSEAS international conference on information science, communications and applications (WSEAS ISCA), Cancun, Mexico (pp. 109–114). ISBN: 960-8457-22-X.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2007, 3–5 May 2006). Constraining random dialogue in modern Eliza. In C. T. A. Schmidt (Ed.), Computers and philosophy, an international conference, proceedings, Laval, France.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2009). Emotion in the Turing test: A downward trend for machines in recent Loebner prizes. In J. Vallverdú & D. Casacuberta (Eds.), Handbook of research on synthetic emotions and sociable robotics (pp. 325–349). Pennsylvania, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-60566-354-8
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2010a). Testing Turing’s five-minutes, parallel-paired imitation game. Kybernetes, 39, 449–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2010b, 29 March–1 April). From the buzzing in Turing’s head to machine intelligence contests. In Towards a comprehensive intelligence test – Reconsidering the Turing test for the 21st century, UK AISB Convention, De Montfort University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2010c). Hidden interlocutor misidentification in practical Turing tests. Minds and Machines, 20, 441–454.10.1007/s11023-010-9219-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, H., Warwick, K., Bland, I., Chapman, C. D., & Allen, M. J. (2012, October 10–12). Turing’s imitation game: Role of error-making in intelligent thought. In Turing in context II, Brussels (pp. 31–32). Retrieved from http://www.computing-conference.ugent.be/file/14 – presentation available here: http://www.academia.edu/1916866/Turings_Imitation_Game_Role_of_Error-making_in_Intelligent_Thought
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. W., (2015). Art and artificial intelligence. ArtEnt. Retrieved March 27, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sterrett, S. G. (2000). Turing’s two tests for intelligence. In J. H. Moor (Ed.), The Turing test – The elusive standard of artificial intelligence (2003) (pp. 79–97). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Traiger, S. (2000). Making the right identification in the Turing test. Minds and Machines, 10, 561–572.10.1023/A:1011254505902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turing, A. M. (1947). Lecture on the automatic computing engine. In B. J. Copeland (Ed.), The essential Turing: The ideas that gave birth to the computer age, 2004 (pp. 378–394). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, LIX, 433–460.10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, K., & Shah, H. (2015a). Human misidentification in Turing tests. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 27, 123–135.10.1080/0952813X.2014.921734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, K., & Shah, H. (2015b). Can machines think? A report on Turing test experiments at the royal society. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. doi:10.1080/0952813X.2015.1055826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, K., & Shah, H. (2015c). The importance of a human viewpoint on computer natural language capabilities: A Turing test perspective. AI & Society. doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0588-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, K., Shah, H., & Moor, J. H. (2013). Some implications of a sample of practical Turing tests. Minds and Machines, 23, 163–177.10.1007/s11023-013-9301-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar