A novel approach to interval comparison and application to software quality evaluation

References

• Azar, D., Harmanani, H., & Korkmaz, R. (2009). A hybrid heuristic approach to optimize rule-based software quality estimation models. Information and Software Technology, 51(9), 1365–1376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanas, S., & Kuchta, D. (1996). Multiobjective programming in optimization of interval objective functions -- A generalized approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 94(3), 594–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. (2014a). Interval-valued fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making methods based on dual optimistic/pessimistic estimations in averaging operations. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 923–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. (2014b). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QUALIFLEX method with a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Information Sciences, 261, 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., & Tsao, C. (2008). The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159(11), 1410–1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da, Q., & Liu, X. (1999). Interval number linear programming and its satisfactory solution. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 19(4), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Dymova, L., Sevastjanov, P., & Tikhonenko, A. (2013). A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(12), 4841–4847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gök, S. A., Palancı, O., & Olgun, M. (2014). Cooperative interval games: Mountain situations with interval data. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 259(Part B), 622–632.
   Google Scholar
• Gou, X., & Xu, Z. (2017). Exponential operations for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and interval numbers in multi-attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16(2), 183–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi, H., Bazargan, J., Mousavi, S. M., & Vahdani, B. (2014). An extended compromise ratio model with an application to reservoir flood control operation under an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(14), 3495–3511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi, H., Mousavi, S. M., & Mojtahedi, S. M. H. (2011). Bootstrap technique for risk analysis with interval numbers in bridge construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(8), 600–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi, H., Mousavi, S. M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Gholipour, Y. (2013). A compromise ranking approach with bootstrap confidence intervals for risk assessment in port management projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(4), 334–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami-Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Agrell, P. J. (2014). Interval data without sign restrictions in DEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(7–8), 2028–2036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibuchi, H., & Tanaka, H. (1990). Multiobjective programming in optimization of the interval objective function. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(2), 219–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar, S., & Bhunia, A. K. (2012). A comparative study of different order relations of intervals. Reliable Computing, 16, 38–72.
   Google Scholar
• Karmakar, S., & Bhunia, A. K. (2013). A new multi-section based technique for constrained optimization problems with interval-valued objective function. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 225, 487–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar, S., & Bhunia, A. K. (2014). An alternative optimization technique for interval objective constrained optimization problems via multiobjective programming. Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, 22(2), 292–303.
   Google Scholar
• Karmakar, S., Mahato, S., & Bhunia, A. (2009). Interval oriented multi-section techniques for global optimization. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 224(2), 476–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ken, C. (2013). Application of interval multiple attribute decision-making method to standard instrument departure procedure design’ scheme. In W. Yang and J. Liang (Eds.), Applied mechanics and materials (Vol. 409, pp. 1248–1252). Zhuhai: Trans Tech Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu, S. (1997). Min-transitivity of fuzzy leftness relationship and its application to decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 86(3), 357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, C., Zhang, Y., Shi, P., & Hu, Z. (2012). Learning very fast decision tree from uncertain data streams with positive and unlabeled samples. Information Sciences, 213, 50–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F. (2009). Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(18), 2686–2700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Wang, X., & Zhang, B. (2001). The ranking of interval numbers. Chinese Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 18(4), 103–109.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenzutti, R., Krohling, R. A., & Reformat, M. Z. (2017). Choquet based TOPSIS and TODIM for dynamic and heterogeneous decision making with criteria interaction. Information Sciences, 408, 41–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, M., Wei, G., Alsaadi, F. E., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2017). Hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33(2), 1105–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merigó, J. M., Casanovas, M., & Yang, J.-B. (2014). Group decision making with expertons and uncertain generalized probabilistic weighted aggregation operators. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. E. (1979). Methods and applications of interval analysis (Vol. 2). Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. E., Kearfott, R. B., & Cloud, M. J. (2009). Introduction to interval analysis. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., & Mojtahedi, S. (2011). A novel approach based on non-parametric resampling with interval analysis for large engineering project risks. Safety Science, 49(10), 1340–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. M., Jolai, F., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A fuzzy stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making approach for selection problems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(2), 207–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. M., Mirdamadi, S., Siadat, A., Dantan, J., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2015). An intuitionistic fuzzy grey model for selection problems with an application to the inspection planning in manufacturing firms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 39, 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. M., Torabi, S. A., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A hierarchical group decision-making approach for new product selection in a fuzzy environment. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 38(11), 3233–3248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. M., Vahdani, B., & Behzadi, S. S. (2016). Designing a model of intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR in multi-attribute group decision-making problems. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 13(1), 45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakahara, Y., Sasaki, M., & Gen, M. (1992). On the linear programming problems with interval coefficients. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 23(1), 301–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T., Kreinovich, V., & Longpre, L. (2004). Dirty pages of logarithm tables, lifetime of the universe, and (subjective) probabilities on finite and infinite intervals. Reliable Computing, 10(2), 83–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan, J., Shi, P., Lim, C.-C., & Wang, X. (2015). Relief supplies allocation and optimization by interval and fuzzy number approaches. Information Sciences, 303, 15–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, A. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (1995). Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(3), 458–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, A., & Pal, T. K. (2000). On comparing interval numbers. European Journal of Operational Research, 127(1), 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevastianov, P. (2007). Numerical methods for interval and fuzzy number comparison based on the probabilistic approach and Dempster--Shafer theory. Information Sciences, 177(21), 4645–4661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevastjanov, P., Bartosiewicz, P., & Tkacz, K. (2010). A new method for normalization of interval weights. In J. Wasniewski, K. Karczewski, J. Dongarra, \ & R. Wyrzykowski (Eds.), Parallel processing and applied mathematics (pp. 466–474). Wroclaw: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sevastjanov, P., Dymova, L., & Bartosiewicz, P. (2012). A new approach to normalization of interval and fuzzy weights. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 198, 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevastianov, P. V., & Róg, P. (2003). A probabilistic approach to fuzzy and crisp interval ordering. Task Quarterly, 7(1), 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Tsaur, R. (2011). Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(8), 4295–4304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdani, B., Mousavi, S. M., Hashemi, H., Mousakhani, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A new compromise solution method for fuzzy group decision-making problems with an application to the contractor selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(2), 779–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdani, B., Mousavi, S. M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2011). Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified topsis method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(9), 4257–4269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, S., & Dong, J. (2014). A possibility degree method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(1), 237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-M., Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2005a). A preference aggregation method through the estimation of utility intervals. Computers & Operations Research, 32(8), 2027–2049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-M., Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2005b). A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 152(3), 475–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G. (2016). Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 7(6), 1093–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G. (2017). Picture 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(4), 997–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G., Lu, M., Alsaadi, F. E., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2017). Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33(2), 1129–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D., & Mendel, J. M. (2009). A comparative study of ranking methods, similarity measures and uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 179(8), 1169–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Chiclana, F. (2014). A social network analysis trust-consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 59, 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Xu, H., Xu, C., & Chen, K. (2016). Uncertain multi-attributes decision making method based on interval number with probability distribution weighted operators and stochastic dominance degree. Knowledge-Based Systems, 113, 199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, M., & Xu, Z. (2014). Interval weight generation approaches for reciprocal relations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(3), 828–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. (2008). Dependent uncertain ordered weighted aggregation operators. Information Fusion, 9(2), 310–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., & Chen, J. (2008). Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 266–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., & Da, Q. (2002). The uncertain OWA operator. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 17(6), 569–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., & Da, Q. (2003). Possibility degree method for ranking interval numbers and its application. Journal of Systems Engineering, 18(1), 67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Yue, C. (2016). A geometric approach for ranking interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers with an application to group decision-making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 233–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C. (2017a). Entropy-based weights on decision makers in group decision-making setting with hybrid preference representations. Applied Soft Computing, 60, 737–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C. (2017b). Two normalized projection models and application to group decision-making. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32(6), 4389–4402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C. (2017c). Normalized projection approach to group decision-making with hybrid decision information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics. In Print. doi:10.1007/s13042-017-0650-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C., & Yue, Z. (2018). A soft approach to evaluate the customer satisfaction in e-retailing. In B. Y. Cao (Ed.), Fuzzy information and engineering and decision. IWDS 2016. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 646, pp. 282–296). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yue, Z. (2012). Application of the projection method to determine weights of decision makers for group decision making. Scientia Iranica, 19(3), 872–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z. (2013a). An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1–2), 112–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z. (2013b). An intuitionistic fuzzy projection-based approach for partner selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(23), 9538–9551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z. (2014a). A group decision making approach based on aggregating interval data into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(2), 683–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z. (2014b). TOPSIS-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Information Sciences, 277, 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z., & Jia, Y. (2013a). An application of soft computing technique in group decision making under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 13(5), 2490–2503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z., & Jia, Y. (2013b). A method to aggregate crisp values into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information for group decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 13(5), 2304–2317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z., & Jia, Y. (2015). A group decision making model with hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 202–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z., & Jia, Y. (2017a). A direct projection-based group decision-making methodology with crisp values and interval data. Soft Computing, 21(9), 2395–2405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Z., & Jia, Y. (2017b). A projection-based approach to intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Scientia Iranica, 24(3), 1505–1518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, C., Luo, W., & Rozi, H. (1997). Comprehensive decision model of interval number. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 17(11), 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Lin, R., & Wei, G. (2014). Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on Einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1086–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar