The Doubly-Bounded Rationality of an Artificial Agent and its Ability to Represent the Bounded Rationality of a Human Decision-Maker in Policy-Relevant Situations

References

• Agah, A., & Bekey, G. A. (1997). Phylogenetic and ontogenetic learning in a colony of interacting robots. Autonomous Robots, 4, 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 17–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrus, A., & Pathak, P. A. (2011). Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 500–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J., & Samuelson, L. (2006). Building rational cooperation. Journal of Economic Theory, 127, 117–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arifovic, J., & Ledyard, J. (2004). Scaling up learning models in public good games. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6(2), 203–238.
   Google Scholar
• Arifovic, J., & Ledyard, J. (2012). Individual evolutionary learning, other-regarding preferences, and the voluntary contributions mechanism. Journal of Public Economics, 96, 808–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axtell, R., Axelrod, R., Epstein, J. M., & Cohen, M. D. (1996). Aligning simulation models: A case study and results. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(1), 123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Bushman, B. J. (2011). Social psychology and human nature (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. (1998). Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 9-30). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bert, F. E., Rovere, S. L., Macal, C. M., North, M. J., & Podestá, G. P. (2014). Lessons from a comprehensive validation of an agent based-model: The experience of the Pampas model of Argentinean agricultural systems. Ecological Modelling, 273, 284–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharathy, G. K., & Silverman, B. G. (2010, December). Validating Agent Based Social Systems Models. Paper presented at the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, Baltimore, MD. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1630&context=ese_papers
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, S., & Ohlsson, S. (2010). Social creativity as a function of agent cognition and network properties: A computer modell. Social Networks, 32, 263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobadilla-Suarez, S., & Love, B. C. (2018). Fast or frugal, but not both: Decision heuristics under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(1), 24–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boose, J. H. (1986). Expertise transfer for expert system design. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. G., Page, S. E., Riolo, R., & Rand, W. (2004). Agent-based and analytical modelling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19(12), 1097–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. G., Page, S. E., Riolo, R., Zellner, M., & Rand, W. (2005). Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19(2), 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B. G., Barstow, D., Bechtal, R., Bennett, J., Clancey, W., Kulikowski, C., … Waterman, D. A. (1983). Constructing an expert system. In F. Hayes-Roth, D. A. Waterman, & D. B. Lenat (Eds.), Building expert systems. New York, NY: Adison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioural game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chater, N. (2018). The mind is flat: The remarkable shallowness of the improvising brain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics, 14(1), 47–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlisk, J. (1996). Why bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 669–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. J., & Stockman, C. K. (2002). Fairness and learning: An experimental examination. Games and Economic Behaviour, 41(1), 26–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, V. P. (2013). Boundedly rational versus optimization-based models of strategic thinking and learning in games. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(2), 512–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawid, H., & Kopel, M. (1998). On economic applications of the genetic algorithm: A model of the cobweb type. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8, 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W. (1982). Conservatism in human information processing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 359-369). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagiolo, G., Dosi, G., & Gabriele, R. (2004). Matching, bargaining, and wage setting in an evolutionary modelof labor market and output dynamics. Advances in Complex Systems, 14, 237–273.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Zurich, Switzerland: University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Filatova, T., Verburg, P. H., Parker, D. C., & Stannard, C. A. (2013). Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems: Challenges and prospects. Environmental Modelling & Software, 45, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2010). Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public good experiments. American Economic Review, 100(1), 541–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economic Letters, 71(3), 397–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Quercia, S. (2012). The behavioural validity of the strategy method in public good experiments. Journal Of Economic Psychology, 33(4), 897–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, D., & Baron, J. (1988). Ambiguity and rationality. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 1(3), 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & The ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertzel, B., Lian, R., Arel, I., De Garis, H., & Chen, S. (2010). A World survey of artificial brain projects, part II: Biologically inspired cognitive architectures. Neurocomputing, 74, 30–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. E., & Holland, J. H. (1988). Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Machine Learning, 3(2–3), 95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Grazzini, J., & Richiardi, M. (2015). Estimation of ergodic agent-based models by simulated minimum distance. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 51, 148–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harstad, R. M., & Selten, R. (2013). Bounded-rationality models: Tasks to become intellectually competitive. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(2), 496–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, S. I., Clark, J. S., Nathan, R., Hovestadt, T., Schurr, F., Fragoso, J. M. V., … Lavorel, S. (2003). Forecasting plant migration rates: Managing uncertainty for risk assessment. Journal of Ecology, 91(3), 341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1962). Outline for a logical theory of adaptive systems. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 3, 297–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1992). Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, 267(1), 66–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2008). Theoretical explanations of treatment effects in voluntary contributions experiments. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1, 846–855.
   Google Scholar
• House, P. W., & Ball, R. H. (1980). Validation: A modern day snipe hunt? conceptual difficulties of validating models. In S. I. Gass (Ed.), Validation and assessment issues of energy models (pp. 153-170). Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration.
   Google Scholar
• House, P. W., & McLeod, J. (1977). Large-scale models for policy evaluation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, T., Allon, G., & Bassamboo, A. (2013). Bounded rationality in service systems. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 15(2), 263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, R. M., & Walker, J. M. (1988). Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contributions mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. (1986). Introduction to expert systems. Wokingham, United Kingdom: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jager, W. (2006). Simulating consumer behaviour: A perspective. In A. Faber, K. Frenken, & A. M. Idenburg’s (Eds.), Environmental policy and modelling in evolutionary economics (pp. 111-136). Bilthoven, Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. A., & Ahn, T. K. (2006). Learning, signaling, and social preferences in public-good games. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, B., Jarvis, D., & Jain, L. (2006). Teams in multi-agent systems. In Z. Shi, K. Shimohara, & D. Feng (Eds.), Intelligent information processing III (pp. 1–10). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, -Z.-Z., Fang, S.-C., Fan, Z.-P., & Wang, D. (2013). Selecting optimal selling format of a product in B2C online auctions with boundedly rational customers. European Journal of Operational Research, 226, 139–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. (2002). Conditions: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109(4), 646–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar: Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition, 11, 123–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keser, C., & Van Winden, F. (2000). Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(1), 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M., Kamp, H., Palm, G., & Doya, K. (2010). A computational neural modelof goaldirected utterance selection. Neural Networks, 23, 592–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Chance, S. (2002). Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review, 109(2), 306–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2018). 40 years of cognitive architectures: Core cognitive abilities and practical applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1–78. doi:10.1007/s10462-018-9646-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017). Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P. (2017). Progress and Challenges in Research of Cognitive Architectures. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-17) (pp. 4870–4876). San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI17/paper/view/15042/13998/
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., Laird, J. E., & Rogers, S. (2009). Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111-194). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Gong, P. (2016). Urban growth models: Progress and perspective. Science Bulletin, 61(21), 1637–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, Z. C. (2018). The mythos of model interpretability. Queue - Machine Learning, 16(3), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2018). Modelling complexity: Cognitive constraints and computational modell-building in integrative systems biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40, 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., Nelson, R. R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. G. (1999). History friendly models of industry evolution: The computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8, 3–41.
   Google Scholar
• Manktelow, K. I. (2004). Reasoning and rationality: The pure and the practical. In K. Manktelow & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology of reasoning: Theoretical and historical perspectives (pp. 157-178). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. E. (2013). Validation and model selection: Three similarity measures compared. Complexity Economics, 2, 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Marohn, C., Schreinemachers, P., Viet Quang, D., Berger, T., Siripalangkanont, P., Nguyen, T. T., & Cadisch, G. (2013). A software coupling approach to assess low-cost soil conservation strategies for highland agriculture in Vietnam. Environmental Modelling & Software, 45, 116–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinty, M., & Milam, G. (2013). Public goods provision by asymmetric agents: Experimental evidence. Social Choice and Welfare, 40(4), 1159–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meegan, D. V. (2010). Zero-sum bias: Perceived competition despite unlimited resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(191), 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P. (2013). Environmental cognition, land change, and social-ecological feedbacks: An overview. Journal of Land Use Science, 8(3), 341–367.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., Freedman, D. J., & Wallis, J. D. (2002). The prefrontal cortex: Categories, concepts, and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 357, 1123–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morewedge, C. K., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C. W., Korris, J. H., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Debiasing decisions: Improving decision making with a single training intervention. Policy Insight from the Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Munier, B., Selten, R., Bouyssou, D., Bourgine, P., Day, R., Harvey, N., … Wensley, R. (1999). Bounded rationality modelling. Marketing Letters, 10(3), 233–248.
   Google Scholar
• Naveh, I., & Sun, R. (2006). A cognitively based simulation of academic science. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 12, 313–337.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, T. H., & Finger, J. M. (1967). Verification of computer simulation models. Management Science, 14(2), B92–B101.
   Google Scholar
• Negnevitsky, M. (2011). Artificial intelligence: A guide to intelligent systems (3rd ed.). Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7-14). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B. D. (2014). Cognitive modelling of socially transmitted affordances: A computational modelof behavioural adoption tested against archival data from the Stanford Prison experiment. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 20, 302–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994). Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science, 263, 641–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (1995). The dynamic nature of ecosystems: Chaos and order. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M. A., Hoffmann, M. J., & Deadman, P. (2003). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2), 314–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parpart, P., Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2018). Heuristics ad Bayesian inference under extreme priors. Cognitive Psychology, 102, 127–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quade, E. S. (1980). Pitfalls in formulation and modeling. In G. Majone & E. S. Quade (Eds.), Pitfalls of analysis (pp. 23-43). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rehder, B. (2003). Categorization as causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 27, 709–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidsma, P., Janssen, S., Jansen, J., & Van Ittersum, M. L. (2018). On the development and use of farm models for policy impact assessment in the European Union – A review. Agricultural Systems, 159, 111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, H., & Huang, T. (2018). Modelling customer bounded rationality in operations management: A review and research opportunities. Computers and Operations Research, 91, 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, A. (1998). Modelling bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sargent, R. G. (2004). Validation and verification of simulation models. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 17–28), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Schreinemachers, P., & Berger, T. (2011). An agent-based simulation model of human-environment interactions in agricultural systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 845–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selten, R. (1998). Features of experimentally observed bounded rationality. European Economic Review, 42, 413–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decisions. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Association, 68(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1995). The information processing theory of mind. The American Psychologist, 50(7), 507–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohl, T. L., & Claggett, P. R. (2013). Clarity versus complexity: Land-use modelling as a practical tool for decision-makers. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 235–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnemans, J., Schram, A., & Offerman, T. (1999). Strategic behaviour in public good games: When partners drift apart. Economics Letters, 62(1), 35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotnik, G. (2018). The SOSIEL platform: Knowledge-based, cognitive, and multi-agent. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 26, 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2016). The comprehensive assessment of rational thinking. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. New York, NY: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, R., & Naveh, I. (2004). Simulating organizational decision-making using a cognitively realistic agent modell. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 7, 3. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/3/5.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London, United Kingdom: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M. (2001). Fast and frugal heuristics for environmentally bounded minds. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 51-70). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M., & Brighton, H. (2016). Building the theory of ecological rationality. Minds and Machines, 26(1–2), 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., & The ABC Research Group. (2012). Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent modell. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udumyan, N., Rouchier, J., & Ami, D. (2014). Integration of path-dependency in a simple learning model: The case of marine resources. Computational Economics, 43(2), 199–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Foerster, H. (1979). Cybernetics of cybernetics. In K. Krippendorff (Ed.), Communication and control in society (pp. 5-8). New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, S. M., & Kulikowski, C. A. (1984). A practical guide to designing expert systems. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wendel, S., & Oppenheimer, J. (2010). An agent-based analysis of context-dependent preferences. Journal Of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 269–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, C., & Brenner, T. (2004). Empirical calibration of simulation models (Paper on Economics and Evolution No. 0410/2004). Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Wilke, A. K., & Mata, R. (2012). Cognitive bias. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), The encyclopedia of human behaviour (Vol. 1, pp. 531–535). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. R., & Leyton-Brown, K. (2010). Beyond Equilibrium: Predicting Human Behaviour in Normal-Form Games. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar