Tracing VARDI coefficients: a proposal

References

• Ackerman, F. (2002) Still Dead After all These Years: Interpreting the Failure of General Equilibrium Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology, 9, 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Cardenete, M.A. and F. Sancho (2012) The Role of Supply Constraints in Multiplier Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 24, 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, A. (1970) Structural Change in the American Economy. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Backer, K. and S. Miroudot (2013) Mapping Global Value Chains. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 159, Paris, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher, E., B. Los, R. Stehrer, M.P. Timmer, and G.J. de Vries (2013) The Construction of World Input–Output Tables in the WIOD Project. Economic Systems Research, 25, 71–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgul, H. and Ł. Lach (2016a) Simulating Evolution of Interindustry Linkages in Endogenous Dynamic IO Model with Layers of Techniques. Metroeconomica, 67, 632–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgul, H. and Ł. Lach (2016b) Comparative Advantage of the EU in Global Value Chains: How Important and Efficient are new EU Members in Transition? Managerial Economics, 17, 21–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hewings, G.J.D., M. Sonis, and R.C. Jensen (1988) Fields of Influence of Technological Change in Input-Output Models. Papers in the Regional Science, 64, 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R.C. and G.J.D. Hewings (1985) Shortcut ‘Input - Output’ Multipliers: a Requiem. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 17, 747–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., E. Dietzenbacher, and B. Los (2012) Improved Estimation of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Cross-Regional Methods. Regional Studies, 46, 621–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J.L. (1983) A Shortcut Method for Computing Final Demand Multipliers for Small Regions: Comment. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 15, 551–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymn, K.O. (1990) Aggregation in Input-Output Models: A Comprehensive Review, 1946–71. Economic Systems Research, 2, 65–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M.L. (1993) A Review of the Literature Supporting the Hybrid Approach to Constructing Regional Input-Output Models. Economic Systems Research, 5, 277–293
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M.L. (2001) A Strategy for Producing Hybrid Regional Input-Output Tables. In: M.L. Lahr and E. Dietzenbacher (eds.) Input–Output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 211–242.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R.E. and P.D. Blair (2009) Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. New York, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhaven, J. and F. Escobedo-Cardeñoso (2011) A new Method to Estimate Input-Output Tables by Means of Structural Lags, Tested on Spanish Regions. Papers in Regional Science, 90, 829–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh, A. and R. Edwards (1977) Estimation of a Technology Matrix From a Domestic Coefficients Matrix and a row of Intermediate Imports in Input-Output Analysis. European Economic Review, 9, 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phibbs, P.J. and A.J. Holsman (1980) A Shortcut Method for Computing Final Demand Multipliers for Small Regions. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 12, 1001–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phibbs, P.J. and A.J. Holsman (1982) Estimating Input-Output Multipliers – A new Hybrid Approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 14, 335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phibbs, P.J. and A.J. Holsman (1983) A Reply to Katz’s Comment. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 15, 555–558.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. and W.J. Morrison (1950) Adjustment of an Inverse Matrix Corresponding to a Change in one Element of a Given Matrix. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21, 124–127.
   Google Scholar
• Sonis, M. and G.J.D. Hewings (1992) Coefficients Change in Input-Output Model: Theory and Applications. Economic Systems Research, 4, 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Tarancón, M.A., F. Callejas, E. Dietzenbacher, and M.L. Lahr (2008) A Revision of the Tolerable Limits Approach: Searching for the Important Coefficients. Economic Systems Research, 20, 75–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temurshoev, U. (2010) Identifying Optimal Sector Groupings with the Hypothetical Extraction Method. Journal of Regional Science, 50, 872–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, S. (2008). Identification of Temporal Fundamental Economic Structure (FES) of India: An Input-Output and Cross-Entropy Analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19, 132–151.
   Google Scholar
• Timmer, M.P. (2012) The world input-output database (WIOD): Contents, sources and methods. WIOD Working Paper 10 (http://www.wiod.org/publications/papers/wiod10.pdf, accessed on 30.08.2017).
   Google Scholar
• Timmer, M.P., B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G.J. de Vries (2013) Fragmentation, Incomes and Jobs. An Analysis of European Competitiveness. Economic Policy, 28, 613–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer, M.P., E. Dietzenbacher, B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G.J. de Vries (2015) An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Data-Base: The Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics, 23, 575–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer, M.P., B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G.J. de Vries (2016) An Anatomy of the Global Trade Slowdown Based on the WIOD 2016 Release. Groningen: GGDC research memorandum number 162, University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• West, G.R. (2000) Updating Input-Output Tables with the Help of a Temporal Fundamental Economic Structure. Australian Journal of Regional Studies, 6, 429–450.
   Google Scholar