A Monte Carlo filtering application for systematic sensitivity analysis of computable general equilibrium results

References

• Anthoff, D. and R.S.L. Tol (2013) The Uncertainty About the Social Cost of Carbon: A Decomposition Analysis Using Fund. Climatic Change, 117, 515–530. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0706-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, C. (1996) An Introduction to Systematic Sensitivity Analysis via Gaussian Quadrature. GTAP Technical Paper, No. 2, July, Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, C. and T.W. Hertel (1997) Revisiting “The Fallacy of Free Trade”. Review of International Economics, 5, 221–229. doi: 10.1111/1467-9396.00052
   Google Scholar
• Artavia, M., H. Grethe, and G. Zimmermann (2015) Stochastic Market Modeling with Gaussian Quadratures: Do Rotations of Stroud’s Octahedron Matter?. Economic Modelling, 45, 155–168. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascou, P., P. Londero, and W. Munch (2006) Policy Reform and Adjustment in the European Union: Changes in the CAP and Enlargement. In D. Blandford and B. Hill (eds), Policy Reform and Adjustment in the Agricultural Sectors of Developed Countries. Wallingford, CABI, pp. 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Belgodère A. and C. Vellutini (2011) Identifying key Elasticities in a CGE Model: a Monte Carlo Approach. Applied Economics Letters, 18, 1–4. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2011.554366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzivasileiadis, T. (2018) Quasi-Monte Carlo Application in CGE Systematic Sensitivity Analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 25, 1521–1526. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2018.1430322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzivasileiadis, T., F. Estrada, M.W. Hofkes, and R.S.J. Tol (2017) Systematic Sensitivity Analysis of the Full Impacts of Sea Level Rise. Computational Economics, ISSN 0927-7099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vuyst, E.A. and P.V. Preckel (1997) Sensitivity Analysis Revisited: A Quadrature-Based Approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 19, 175–185. doi: 10.1016/0161-8938(95)00145-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vuyst, E.A. and P.V. Preckel (2007) Gaussian Cubature: A Practitioner’s Guide. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 45, 787–794. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.07.021
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S.C. (1986) The Capital Account and Regional Balance of Payments Problems. Urban Studies, 23, 173–184. doi: 10.1080/00420988620080211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa M., D. Psaltopoulos, F. Santini, E. Phimister, D. Roberts, S. Mary, T. Ratinger, D. Skuras, E. Balamou, M.A. Cardenete, and S. Gomez y Paloma (2013) Ex-ante Analysis of the Regional Impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy: A Rural-Urban Recursive Dynamic CGE Model Approach. European Planning Studies, doi:doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.786683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011) Proposal for a Regulation of the E. Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).{SEC(2011) 1153}{SEC(2011) 1154}. Brussels, 19.10.2011. COM(2011) 627 final/2.
   Google Scholar
• Gohin, A. and L. Latruffe (2006) The Luxembourg Common Agricultural Policy Reform and the European Food Industries: What’s at Stake?. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 175–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2006.00044.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, S.J., K. Turner, G. Hewings, P. McGregor, and K.J. Swales (2010). Econometric Estimation of Armington Import Elasticities and Their System-wide Impact in a Regional CGE Model of the Illinois Economy, Stirling Economics Discussion Paper 2010–19, December.
   Google Scholar
• Haber, S. (1970) Numerical Integration of Multiple Integrals. SIAM Review, 12, 481–526. doi: 10.1137/1012102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermeling, C. and T. Mennel (2008) Sensitivity Analysis in Economic Simulations: A Systematic Approach. ZEW Discussion Papers 08-068, Center for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany. Available online in October 2018 at https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/2100/1/dp08068.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D. (2010) What Happens When Exports Expand: Some Ideas for Closure of Regional Computable General Equilibrium Models. The Annals of Regional Science, 45, 439–451. doi: 10.1007/s00168-009-0311-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyytiä, N. (2011) Allocation of CAP Modulation Funds to Rural Development Measures at the Regional Level in Finland. Paper prepared for presentation at the EAAE 2011 Congress Change and Uncertainty, August 30 to September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Kilkenny, M. (2008) The New Rural Economics. Chapter 5 in Wu, J., Barklay, P. W. and Weber, B. A. (eds.), Frontiers in Resource and Rural Economics: Human-Nature, Rural-Urban Interdependencies. Washington, DC, RFF Press Book, pp. 63–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lima M.C. and M.A. Cardenete (2007) The Effects of European Funds on a Regional Economy: an Applied General Equilibrium Analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 14, 851–855. doi: 10.1080/13504850600592630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofgren, H., R.L. Harris, and S. Robinson (2002) A Standard Computable General Equilibrium Model (CGE) in GAMS. Microcomputers in Policy Research, 5. Washington, DC, IFPRI, pp. 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Mattas, K.A. and C.M. Shrestha (1991) A New Approach to Determining Sectoral Priorities in an Economy: Input-Output Elasticities. Applied Economics, 23, 247–254. doi: 10.1080/00036849108841069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R.E. and P.D. Blair (2009) Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, 2nd ed. New York, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhauser, M., A. Welz and G.D. Ruxton (2017) Statistical Tests for the Comparison of two Samples: the General Alternative. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 46, 903–909. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2014.983651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, M.D. and D.S. Rickman (1998) Regional Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: A Survey and Critical Appraisal. International Regional Science Review, 21, 205–248. doi: 10.1177/016001769802100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, M.D. and D.S. Rickman (2010) Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Modelling for Regional Economic Development Analysis. Regional Studies, 44, 1311–1328. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phimister, E. and D. Roberts (2012) The Role of Ownership in Determining the Rural Economic Benefits of on-Shore Wind Farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 331–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel P.V., M. Verma, T.W. Hertel and W. Martin (2011) Systematic sensitivity analysis for GTAP – where we’ve been and where we’re going. Selected Paper for 14th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, 16–18 June 2011, Venice, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Psaltopoulos D., E. Balamou, D. Skuras, T. Ratinger, S. Sieber (2011) Modelling the Impacts of CAP Pillar 1 and 2 Measures on Local Economies in Europe: Testing a Case Study-Based CGE Model Approach. Journal of Policy Modelling, 33, 53–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickman, D. (1992) Estimating the Impacts of Regional Business Assistance Programs: Alternative Closures in a Computable General Equilibrium Model. Papers in Regional Science, 71, 421–435. doi: 10.1007/BF01434466
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (1995) UK Agriculture in the Wider Economy: The Importance of Net SAM Linkage Effects. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 22, 495–511. doi: 10.1093/erae/22.4.495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., A. Cattaneo and M. El-Said (2001) Updating and Estimating a Social Accounting Matrix Using Cross Entropy Methods. Economic Systems Research, 13, 47–64. doi: 10.1080/09535310120026247
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli A., M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana and S. Tarantola, eds. (2008) Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer. West Sussex, UK, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli A., S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo and M. Ratto (2004) Sensitivity Analysis in Practice – A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models. West Sussex, UK, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Storlie C.B., and J.C. Helton (2008) Multiple Predictor Smoothing Methods for Sensitivity Analysis: Description of Techniques. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93, 28–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, A.H. (1957) Remarks on the Disposition of Points in Numerical Integration Formulas. Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation, 11, 257–261. doi: 10.2307/2001945
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, J. (2008) A Recursive Dynamic CGE Model and Microsimulation Poverty Module for South Africa. Washington, IFPRI. Available online http://www.tips.org.za/files/2008/Thurlow_J_SA_CGE_and_microsimulation_model_Jan08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Törmä, H. and H. Lehtonen (2009) Macroeconomic and Welfare Effects of the CAP Reform and Further Decoupling of Agricultural Support in Finland: A CGE Modelling Approach. Food Economics - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C, 6, 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Villoria, N.B. and P.V. Preckel (2017) Gaussian Quadratures vs. Monte Carlo Experiments for Systematic Sensitivity Analysis of Computable General Equilibrium Model Results. Economics Bulletin, 37, 480–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, E.C., D.W. Holland and B. Weber (1997) Economic Impacts of a Property tax Limitation: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Oregon’s Measure 5. Land Economics, 73, 72–89. doi: 10.2307/3147078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggle, R.M. (1991) The Pagan-Shannon Approximation: Unconditional Systematic Analyses in Minutes. Empirical Economics, 16, 35–49. doi: 10.1007/BF01205344
   Google Scholar