Projecting supply and use tables: new variants and fair comparisons

References

• Arto, I., J.M. Rueda-Cantuche and G.P. Peters (2014) Comparing the GTAP-MRIO and WIOD Databases for Carbon Footprint Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 26, 327–353. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2014.939949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutel, J. (2002) The Economic Impact of Objective 1 Interventions for the Period 2000–2006. Report to the Directorate–General for Regional Policies, Konstanz. Available in http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/objective1/final_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Beutel, J. (2008) An Input-Output System of Economic Accounts for the EU Member States. Interim Report for Service Contract Number 150830-2007 FISC-D to European Commission. Directorate–General Joint Research Centre. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, M. and T. Mules (1980) A Testing Routine for Evaluating Cell by Cell Accuracy in Short-cut Regional Input-Output Tables. Journal of Regional Science, 20, 293–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1980.tb00648.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, R.B. and M.A. Stephens (1986) Goodness of Fit Techniques. New York, Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgaard, E. and C. Gysting (2004) An Algorithm for Balancing Commodity-Flow Systems. Economic Systems Research, 16, 169–190. doi: 10.1080/0953531042000219295
   Google Scholar
• De Mesnard, L. (2004) Biproportional Methods of Structural Change Analysis: a Typological Survey. Economic Systems Research, 16, 205–230. doi: 10.1080/0953531042000219312
   Google Scholar
• De Mesnard, L. and R.E. Miller (2006) A Note on Added Information in the RAS Procedure: Re-Examination of Some Evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 517–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2006.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher, E. (1997) In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: A Reinterpretation as a Price Model. Journal of Regional Science, 37, 629–651. doi: 10.1111/0022-4146.00073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2008) Manual of Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables. Luxembourg, Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, B. and M. Lenzen (2009) Estimating Generalised Regional Input-Output Systems: A Case Study of Australia. In: M. Ruth and B. Davíðsdóttir (eds.) The Dynamics of Regions and Networks in Industrial Ecosystems, Cheltenham, England, Edward Elgar Publishing 55–82.
   Google Scholar
• Günlük-Senesen, G. and J.M. Bates (1988) Some Experiments with Methods of Adjusting Unbalanced Data Matrices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 151, 473–490. doi: 10.2307/2982995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewings, G.J.D. (1969) Regional Input-Output Models Using National Data: The Structure of the West Midlands Economy. The Annals of Regional Science, 3, 179–191. doi: 10.1007/BF01283763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewings, G.J.D. (1977) Evaluating the Possibilities for Exchanging Regional Input-Output Coefficients. Environment and Planning A, 9, 927–944. doi: 10.1068/a090927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W., S. Kobayashi and H. Tanji (2008) Updating an Input–Output Matrix with Sign–Preservation: Some Improved Objective Functions and their Solutions. Economic Systems Research, 20, 111–123. doi: 10.1080/09535310801892082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, R.J. and A.B. Koehler (2006) Another Look at Measures of Forecast Accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 22, 679–688. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R.W. (1998) Regionalizing National Commodity-by-Industry Accounts, Economic Systems Research, 10, 223–238 doi: 10.1080/762947109
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R.W. and A.T. Murray (2004) Alternative Input–Output Matrix Updating Formulations, Economic Systems Research, 16, 135–148. doi: 10.1080/0953531042000219268
   Google Scholar
• Junius, T. and J. Oosterhaven (2003) The Solution of Updating or Regionalizing a Matrix with Both Positive and Negatives Entries. Economic Systems Research, 15, 87–96. doi: 10.1080/0953531032000056954
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, D.C. and A.S. Fotheringham (1986) Matrix Comparison, Goodness of Fit and Spatial Interaction Modelling. International Regional Science Review, 10,127–147. doi: 10.1177/016001768601000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullback, S. and R.A. Leibler (1951) On Information and Sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 79–86. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729694
   Google Scholar
• Kullback, S. (1959) Information Theory and Statistics. New York, John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M.L. (2001) Reconciling Domestication Techniques, the Notion of Re-exports and Some Comments on Regional Accounting, Economic Systems Research, 13, 165–179 doi: 10.1080/09537320120052443
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M. L. and L. de Mesnard (2004) Biproportional Techniques in Input-Output Analysis: Table Updating and Structural Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 16, 115–134. doi: 10.1080/0953531042000219259
   Google Scholar
• Lemelin, A. (2009) A GRAS Variant Solving for Minimum Information Loss. Economic Systems Research, 21, 399–408. doi: 10.1080/09535311003589310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., R. Wood and B. Gallego (2007) Some Comments on the GRAS Method. Economic Systems Research, 19, 461–465. doi: 10.1080/09535310701698613
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., B. Gallego and R. Wood (2009) Matrix Balancing Under Conflicting Information. Economic Systems Research, 21, 23–44. doi: 10.1080/09535310802688661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makridakis, S. (1993) Accuracy Measures: Theoretical and Practical Concerns. International Journal of Forecasting, 1, 111–153. doi: 10.1002/for.3980010202
   Google Scholar
• Mainar-Causapié, A. et al. (2017) Estimating Regional Social Accounting Matrices to Analyse Rural Development. SORT-Statistics and Operations Research Transactions, 41(2), 319–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesnard, L. and R.E. Miller (2006) A Note on Added Information in the RAS Procedure: Reexamination of Some Evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 46(3), 517–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2006.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhaven, J. (2005) GRAS versus Minimizing Absolute and Squared Differences: A Comment. Economic Systems Research, 17, 327–331. doi: 10.1080/09535310500221864
   Google Scholar
• Polenske, K. R. (1997) Current uses of the RAS Technique: A Critical Review. In: Simonovits, A. and A.E. Steenge (eds.) Proportions, Growth, and Cycles. London, Macmillan, 58–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda-Cantuche, J.M. (2011) The Choice of Type of Input-Output Table Revisited: Moving Towards the use of Supply-use Tables in Impact Analysis. Statistics and Operations Research Transactions (SORT), 35, 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpell, M.C. (2018) Incorporating Data Quality Improvement into Supply-use Table Balancing. Economic Systems Research, 30, 271–288 doi: 10.1080/09535314.2017.1396962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C.E. (1948a) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Bulletin Journal, 27, 379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C.E. (1948b) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Bulletin Journal, 27, 623–659. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
   Google Scholar
• Szyrmer, J. (1989) Trade-off between Error and Information in the RAS Procedure. In: R.E. Miller, K.R. Polenske and A.Z. Rose (eds.) Frontiers of Input-Output Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Temurshoev, U., C. Webb and N. Yamano (2011) Projection of Supply and Use Tables: Methods and Their Empirical Assessment. Economic Systems Research, 23, 91–123. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2010.534978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temurshoev, U. and M.P. Timmer (2011) Joint Estimation of Supply and use Tables. Papers in Regional Science, 90, 863–882. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00345.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temurshoev, U. (2012) Entropy-based Benchmarking Methods. Research Memorandum GD-122. Groningen Growth and Development Centre. Groningen University. Available in https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/15517759/gd122.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Temurshoev, U., R. E. Miller and M. C. Bouwmeester (2013) A Note on the GRAS Method. Economic Systems Research, 25, 342–361. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2012.746645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer, M.P., P. Aulin-Ahmavaara and M. Ho (2005) “EUKLEMS Road Map. WP1”. Available in www.euklems.net/workpackages/roadmap_wp1_12-10-2005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2018) Handbook on Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables with Extensions and Applications. ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/74/Rev.1, United Nations Publications, New York, 2018. Link: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SUT_IOT_HB_wc.pdf
   Google Scholar