1,980
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Price re-interpretations of the basic IO quantity models result in the ultimate input-output equations

ORCID Icon
Pages 191-200 | Received 13 Mar 2022, Accepted 13 Dec 2022, Published online: 10 Jan 2023

References

  • Boer, P. C. M. de. (1976). On the relationship between production functions and input–output analysis with fixed value shares. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 112(4), 754–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705985
  • Davar, E. (1989). Input–output and general equilibrium. Economic Systems Research, 1(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535318900000022
  • Dietzenbacher, E. (1997). In vindication of the Ghosh model: A reinterpretation as a price model. Journal of Regional Science, 37(4), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00073
  • Ghosh, A. (1958). Input–output approach in an allocation system. Economica, 25(4), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2550694
  • Gruver, G. W. (1989). On the plausibility of the supply-driven input–output model: A theoretical basis for input-coefficient change. Journal of Regional Science, 29(3), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1989.tb01389.x
  • Guerra, A.-I., & Sancho, F. (2011). Revisiting the original Ghosh model: Can it be made more plausible? Economic Systems Research, 23(3), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2011.566261
  • Leontief, W. W. (1941). The structure of the American economy, 1919-1929: An empirical application of equilibrium analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  • Leontief, W. W. (1951). The structure of the American economy: 1919-1939, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.
  • Mesnard, L. de. (2009). Is the Ghosh model interesting? Journal of Regional Science, 49(2), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00593.x
  • Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2022). Input–output analysis, foundations and extensions, Third edition. Cambridge University Press.
  • Oosterhaven, J. (1988). On the plausibility of the supply-driven input–output model. Journal of Regional Science, 28(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1988.tb01208.x
  • Oosterhaven, J. (1989). The supply-driven input–output model: A new interpretation but still implausible. Journal of Regional Science, 29(3), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1989.tb01391.x
  • Oosterhaven, J. (2012). Adding supply-driven consumption makes the Ghosh model even more implausible. Economic Systems Research, 24(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2011.635137
  • Oosterhaven, J. (2022). Rethinking input–output analysis, a spatial perspective, Second edition. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer.
  • Przybyliński, M., & Gorzałczyński, A. (2022). Applying the input–output price model to identify inflation processes. Journal of Economic Structures, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-022-00264-w
  • Rose, A., & Allision, T. (1989). On the plausibility of the supply-driven input–output model: Empirical evidence on joint stability. Journal of Regional Science, 29(3), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1989.tb01390.x
  • Rose, A., Wei, D., & Paul, D. (2018). Economic consequences of and resilience to a disruption of petroleum trade: The role of seaports in U.S. energy security. Energy Policy, 115, 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.052
  • Rueda-Cantuche, J. M. (2011). The choice of type of input–output table revisited: Moving towards the use of supply-use tables in impact analysis. Statistics and Operations Research Transactions, 35(1), 21–38.