A new alternative for matrix balancing under conflicting information

References

• Allen, R. I. G. (1974). Some experiments with the RAS method of updating input–output coefficients. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 36(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1974.mp36003005.x
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, M. (1965). Estimating nonnegative matrices from marginal data. International Economic Review, 6(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacharach, M. (1970). Biproportional matrices and input-output change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bilbao Terol, A., González Vega, C., & Rodríguez Uría, M. V. (1994). Matrices especiales: aplicaciones económicas (071/94; Documentos de Trabajo. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales).
   Google Scholar
• Bregman, L. M. (1967). Proof of the convergence of sheleikhovskii’s method for a problem with transportation constraints. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 7(1), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(67)90069-9
   Google Scholar
• Canning, P., & Wang, Z. (2005). A flexible mathematical programming model to estimate interregional input-output accounts. Journal of Regional Science, 45(3), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, S. (1992). A note on a lagrangian derivation of a general multi-proportional scaling algorithm. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(2), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90017-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgaard, E., & Gysting, C. (2004). An algorithm for balancing commodity-flow systems. Economic Systems Research, 16(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531042000219295
   Google Scholar
• de Mesnard, L. (2003). What is the best method of matrix adjustment? A formal answer by a return to the world of vectors. 50th Annual North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1994954
   Google Scholar
• de Mesnard, L., & Miller, R. E. (2006). A note on added information in the RAS procedure: Reexamination of some evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2006.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940). On a least squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(4), 427–444. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2235722. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731829
   Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher, E., & Hoen, A. R. (1999). Double deflation and aggregation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 31(9), 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1068/a311695
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Liria, C. (2004). El estructuralismo. El sentido de una polémica. In J. M. Navarro Cordón (Ed.), Perspectivas del pensamiento contemporáneo. Vol. I (pp. 95–131). Síntesis.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Vázquez, E. (2016). A Generalized Cross Entropy formulation for matrix balancing with both positive and negative entries. 24th International Input-Output Conference, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Vázquez, E., Hewings, G. J. D., & Ramos Carvajal, C. (2015). Adjustment of input–output tables from two initial matrices. Economic Systems Research, 27(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2015.1007839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folloni, G., & Miglierina, C. (1994). Hypothesis of price formation in input–output tables. Economic Systems Research, 6(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319400000022
   Google Scholar
• Gerking, S. D. (1976). Reconciling “rows only” and “columns only” coefficients in an input-output model. International Regional Science Review, 1(2), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001767600100203
   Google Scholar
• Geschke, A., Ugon, J., Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., & Moran, D. D. (2019). Balancing and reconciling large multi-regional input–output databases using parallel optimisation and high-performance computing. Journal of Economic Structures, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-019-0133-7
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, D. A., & St. Louis, L. V. (1999). Completing input–output tables using partial information, with an application to Canadian data. Economic Systems Research, 11(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319900000013
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, D. A., & St. Louis, L. V. (2004). An algorithm for the consistent inclusion of partial information in the revision of input-output tables. Economic Systems Research, 16(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531042000219277
   Google Scholar
• Golan, A., Judge, G., & Robinson, S. (1994). Recovering information from incomplete or partial multisectoral economic data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(3), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günlük-Şenesen, G., & Bates, J. M. (1988). Some experiments with methods of adjusting unbalanced data matrices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 151(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/2982995
   Google Scholar
• Hoen, A. R. (2002). An input-output analysis of European integration. North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Holý, V., & Šafr, K. (2022). Disaggregating input–output tables by the multidimensional RAS method: A case study of the Czech republic. Economic Systems Research, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2022.2091978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IGE. (2015). Marco input-output de Galicia. Metodoloxía.
   Google Scholar
• IGE. (2019). Marco input-output de Galicia 2016. Metodoloxía. chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://www.ige.eu/estatico/pdfs/s3/metodoloxias/Met_actualizacionMiogal_16_es.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. W., & Murray, A. T. (2004). Alternative input-output matrix updating formulations. Economic Systems Research, 16(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531042000219268
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. C., & McGaurr, D. (1976). Reconciliation of purchases and sales estimates in an input-output table. Urban Studies, 13(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987620080081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junius, T., & Oosterhaven, J. (2003). The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries. Economic Systems Research, 15(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531032000056954
   Google Scholar
• Kruinthof, J. (1937). Calculation of telephone traffic. De Inyenieur (E. Elektrotechnik 3, 52(15–25).
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M. L. (1993). A review of the literature supporting the hybrid approach to constructing regional input–output models. Economic Systems Research, 5(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319300000023
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M. L. (2001). A strategy for producing hybrid regional input–output tables. In M. L. Lahr, & E. Dietzenbacher (Eds.), Input–output analysis: Frontiers and extensions (pp. 21–242). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M. L. (2018). Regional input-output analysis: An appraisal of an imperfect world. In J. Callicó López, & E. J. González Robles (Eds.), Estudios regionales. Un enfoque insumo-producto (pp. 213–235). Universidad de Guadalajara. https://doi.org/10.7282/T3H1340W
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M. L., & de Mesnard, L. (2004). Biproportional techniques in input–output analysis: Table updating and structural analysis. Economic Systems Research, 16(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531042000219259
   Google Scholar
• Lecomber, J. R. C. (1975). A critique of methods of adjusting, updating and projecting matrices. In R. I. G. Allen, & W. F. Gossling (Eds.), Estimating and projecting input–output coefficients (pp. 1–25). Input-Output Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Gallego, B., & Wood, R. (2006). A flexible approach to matrix balancing under partial information. Journal of Applied Input-Output Analysis, 11(January 2007), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Gallego, B., & Wood, R. (2009). Matrix balancing under conflicting information. Economic Systems Research, 21(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310802688661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Moran, D. D., Geschke, A., & Kanemoto, K. (2014). A non-sign-preserving RAS variant. Economic Systems Research, 26(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.897933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Kuroko, M. (2016). Single deflation bias in value added: Verification using Japanese real input–output tables (1960–2000). Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 4(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.15640/jeds.v4n1a2
   Google Scholar
• Macgill, S. M. (1977). Theoretical properties of biproportional matrix adjustments. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 9(6), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1068/a090687
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan, S., Beutel, J., Guerrero, S., Inomata, S., Larsen, S., Moyer, B., Remond-Tiedrez, I., Rueda Cantuche, J. M., Hobebelstad Simpson, L., Thage, B., Van Rompaey, C., Verbiest, P., & Di Matteo, I. (2018). Handbook on supply and Use tables and input output - tables with extensions and applications (S. Mahajan, Ed.). United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, R. A. (1999). Entropy Theory and RAS are Friends. In GTAP Working Papers (No. 6; GTAP Working Papers).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input – output analysis. Foundations and extensions (2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mínguez, R., Oosterhaven, J., & Escobedo-Cardeñoso, F. (2009). Cell-corrected RAS method (CRAS) for updating or regionalizing an input-output matrix. Journal of Regional Science, 49(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00594.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, E. T., Roesch, C. E., Rassier, D. G., Howels, T. F., & Empey, N. R. (2007). Implementing a Reconciliation and Balancing Model in the U.S. Industry Accounts. Statistical Methodology Research Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Möhr, M., Crown, W. H., & Polenske, K. R. (1987). A linear programming approach to solving infeasible RAS problems. Journal of Regional Science, 27(4), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1987.tb01183.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolardi, V. (2013). Simultaneously balancing supply-use tables at current and constant prices: A new procedure. Economic Systems Research, 25(4), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2013.808990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paelinck, J., & Waelbroeck, J. (1963). Etude empirique sur l’evolution des coefficients input-output. Belgian Journal of Operations Research, Statistics, and Computer Science, 4(1), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira López, X., Carrascal Incera, A., & Fernández Fernández, M. (2013). Advances in updating input-output tables: Its relevance for the analysis of regional economies. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 33(1), 3–12. http://hdl.handle.net/10316.2/27120.
   Google Scholar
• Pukelsheim, F. (2014). Biproportional scaling of matrices and the iterative proportional fitting procedure. Annals of Operations Research, 215(1), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1468-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukelsheim, F., & Simeone, B. (2009). On the Iterative Proportional Fitting Procedure: Structure of Accumulation Points and L1-Error Analysis. In Preprints des Instituts für Mathematik der Universität Augsburg (05/2009; Preprints Des Instituts Für Mathematik Der Universität Augsburg).
   Google Scholar
• Quiñoá López, X. L. (2013). About the size of the measurement units in a Leontief system and its consequences (No. 52; Análise Económica). https://www.usc.es/gl/institutos/idega/publicacions/area-analise-economica.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rampa, G. (2008). Using weighted least squares to deflate input-output tables. Economic Systems Research, 20(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310802344349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, J. (2014). A Bayesian approach to the balancing of statistical economic data. Entropy, 16(3), 1243–1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/e16031243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, J. F. D., & Lahr, M. L. (2018). The reconciliation of multiple conflicting estimates: Entropy-based and axiomatic approaches. Entropy, 20(11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20110815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. H., & Zenios, S. A. (1990). A comparative study of algorithms for matrix balancing. Operations Research, 38(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.38.3.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, J. R. N., & Brown, A. (1962). A computable model of economic growth. Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, J. R. N., Champernowne, D. G., & Meade, J. E. (1942). The precision of national income estimates. The Review of Economic Studies, 9(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967664
   Google Scholar
• Temursho, U., Miller, R. E., & Bouwmeester, M. C. (2013). A note on the GRAS method. Economic Systems Research, 25(3), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.746645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temursho, U., & Timmer, M. P. (2011). Joint estimation of supply and use tables. Papers in Regional Science, 90(4), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00345.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temursho, U., Webb, C., & Yamano, N. (2011). Projection of supply and use tables: Methods and their empirical assessment. Economic Systems Research, 23(1), 91–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2010.534978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termursho, U., Cardenete, M. A., Wojtowicz, K., Rey Los Santos, L., Weitzel, M., Vandyck, T., & Saveyn, B. (2020). Projecting input-output tables for model baselines. https://doi.org/10.2760/5343.
   Google Scholar
• Timmer, M. P. (2005). EUKLEMS Road map WP1. http://www.euklems.net/workpackages/roadmap_wp1_12-10-2005.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tsionas, M. G. (2020). Bayesian input–output table update using a benchmark LASSO prior. Economic Systems Research, 32(3), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2019.1707170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1973). Input–output tables and analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Valderas Jaramillo, J. M., & Rueda Cantuche, J. M. (2021). The multidimensional nD-GRAS method: Applications for the projection of multiregional input–output frameworks and valuation matrices. Papers in Regional Science, 100(6), 1599–1624. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valderas Jaramillo, J. M., Rueda Cantuche, J. M., Olmedo, E., & Beutel, J. (2019). Projecting supply and use tables: New variants and fair comparisons. Economic Systems Research, 31(3), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1545221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, F. (1982). Reliability and the adjustment of sequences of large economic accounting matrices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 145(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/2981533
   Google Scholar
• Villaverde López, G. (2014). Estructura y deixis. La teoría kantiana de la objetividad en el horizonte de la época moderna. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. (2011). Construction, stability and predictability of an input-output time-series for Australia. Economic Systems Research, 23(2), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2011.564156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H., Többen, J., Dietzenbacher, E., Moran, D., Meng, J., Wang, D., & Guan, D. (2022). Entropy-based Chinese city-level MRIO table framework. Economic Systems Research, 34(4), 519–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2021.1932764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar