Performance measurement system contingency factors: a cross analysis of Italian and Indian SMEs

References

• Antonioli, D., M. Mazzanti, and P. Pini. 2010. “Productivity, innovation strategies and industrial relations in SMEs. Empirical evidence for a local production system in Northern Italy.” International Review of Applied Economics 24(4): 453–482.
   Google Scholar
• Bala Subrahmanya, M. H. 2005. “Small-scale industries in India in the globalisation era: performance and prospects.” International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development 2(1): 122–139.
   Google Scholar
• Bammens, Y., W. Voordeckers, and A. Van Gils. 2008. “Boards of directors in family firms: a generational perspective.” Small Business Economics 31(2): 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barach, J. A. 1984. “Is there a cure for the paralyzed family board?” Sloan Management Review 26(1): 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. 1991. “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management 17: 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxi, C. V. 2005. “The current context of corporate governance in India.” Global Business Review 6(2): 303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Bititci, U., et al. 2011a. “Managerial processes: business process that sustain performance.” International Journal of Operation and Production Management 31(8): 851–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci, U., et al. 2011b. “Performance measurement: where next?” International Journal of Management Reviews 13(4): in press.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, C., B. De Branbander, and A. Van Witteloostuijn. 1996. “CEO locus of control and small firm performance: an integrative framework and empirical test.” Journal of Management Studies 33(5): 667–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M. 2005. “Researching performance measurement system implementation: the dynamics of success and failure.” Production Planning & Control 16(2): 101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., et al. 2002. “The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22(11): 1288–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowonder, B. 1998. “Industrialization and economic growth of India: interaction of indigenous and foreign technology.” International Journal of Technology Management 15(6–7): 622–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagliano, R., K. Blackmon, and C. Voss. 2001. “Small firms under microscope: international differences in production/operations management practices and performance.” Integrated Manufacturing Systems 12(7): 469–482.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, M. 2005. “Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29: 249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, R., W. L. Megginson, and P. K. Yadav. 2008. “Corporate governance in India.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 20: 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Compagno, C. 2000. “Corporate governance in Italian family – owned small firms.” Small Business 3: 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T., and D. T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi experimentation: design and analysis issue for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G., and D. Montemerlo. 1999. “Ownership, governance, and management issues in small and medium-size family businesses.” Family Business Review 12(4): 361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G., and C. Salvato. 2004. “The board of directors in family firms: one size fits all?” Family Business Review 17: 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G., and S. Tomaselli. 1996. “Boards of Directors in Italian family businesses.” Family Business Review 9: 403–421.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., and A. C. Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cowling, M. 2003. “Productivity and corporate governance in smaller firms.” Small Business Economics 20: 335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., D. R. Dalton, and A. A. Cannella. 2003. “Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data.” Academy of Management Review 28: 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., et al. 1998. “Meta analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance.” Strategic Management Journal 9: 269–290.
   Google Scholar
• Dangayach, G. S., and S. G. Deshmukh. 2000. “Manufacturing strategy: experiences from select Indian organisations.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 19(2): 134–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangayach, G. S., and S. G. Deshmukh. 2003. “Evidence of manufacturing strategies in Indian industry: a survey.” International Journal of Production Economics 83: 279–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waal, A. 2007. Strategic performance management. A managerial and behavioural approach. New York: Pagrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deakins, D., E. O’Neill, and P. Mileham. 2000. “The role and influence of external directors in small, entrepreneurial companies: some evidence on VC and non-VC appointed external directors.” Venture Capital 2: 111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1978. The research act. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Donckels, R., and E. Fröhlich. 1991. “Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS.” Family Business Review 7: 149–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, N., and A. K. Jain. 2005. “Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: the effect of board size and ownership.” Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 17(3): 161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. 1989. “Building theories from case-study research.” Academy of Management Review 14(4): 116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. “Separation of ownership and control.” Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. G., and J. L. Fielding. 1986. Linking data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., and D. C. Hambrick. 1996. Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organisations. Minneapolis/St Paul: West Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L., et al. 1991. Performance measurement in service businesses. London: CIMA.
   Google Scholar
• Folan, P., and J. Browne. 2005. “A review of performance measurement: towards performance management.” Computers in Industry 56(7): 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, D., and F. Milliken. 1999. “Cognition and corporate governance: understanding Boards of Directors as strategic decision making groups.” Academy of Management Review 24: 489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J., and M. Huse. 2005. “Outside directors in SME boards: a call for theoretical reflections.” Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition 1(1): 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J., and H. Winlund. 2000. “Boards of Directors in small and medium-sized industrial firms: examining the effects of the board's working style on board task performance.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 12(4): 311–330.
   Google Scholar
• Garengo, P. 2009. “Performance measurement system in SMEs taking part to quality award programs.” Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 20(3): 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Garengo, P., and G. Bernardi. 2007. “Organisational capability in SMEs: performance measurement as a key system in supporting company development.” International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management 56(5/6): 518–532.
   Google Scholar
• Garengo, P., S. Biazzo, and U. Bititci. 2005. “Performance measurement systems in SMEs: a review for a research agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 7(1): 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garengo, P., and U. Bititci. 2007. “Towards a contingency approach to performance measurement: an empirical study in Scottish SMEs.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 27(8): 802–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., D. R. Wood Jr, and R. Khan. 2001. “Networking strategy of boards: implications for small and medium-sized enterprises.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 13(3): 269–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose, A. K. 2001. “SMEs and environment protection.” Productivity 42(2): 210–216.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., and R. L. Nolan. 1974. “Managing the four stages of EDP growth.” Harvard Business Review 52(1): 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnan, L., and D. Montemerlo. 2001. “Structure and dynamics of ownership, governance and strategy: role of family and impact on performance in Italian SMEs.” In The role of family in family business, edited by G. Corbetta and D. Montemerlo. Milano, Italy: EGEA.
   Google Scholar
• Grundei, J., and T. Talaulicar. 2002. “Company law and corporate governance of start-ups in Germany: legal stipulations, managerial requirements, and modification strategies.” Journal of Management and Governance 6: 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., F. Lotti, and J. Mairesse. 2009. “Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empiricl evidence for Italy.” Small Business Economics 33(1): 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., and P. A. Mason. 1984. “Upper echelons: the organisation as a reflection of its top managers.” Academy of Management Review 9: 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler, W. C. 1989. “Handler, methodological issues and considerations in studying family business.” Family Business Review 1(4): 257–276.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S J Jr. 1999. “What can the family contribute to business? Examining contractual relationships.” Family Business Review 12(1): 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. “Boards of Directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives.” Academy of Management Review 28: 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, M., and M. B. Miles. 2002. The qualitative researcher's companion. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, M., P. A. Smart, and M. Bourne. 2001. “Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 21(8): 1096–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson Smith, M., and D. Smith. 2007. “Implementing strategically aligned performance measurement in small firms.” International Journal of Production Economics 106(2): 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huse, M. 2005. “Corporate governance: understanding important contingencies.” Corporate Ownership & Control 2: 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jackling, B., and S. Johl. 2009. “Board structure and firm performance: evidence from India's top companies.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 17(4): 492–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S. K., and D. E. Gumpert. 1980. “Look to outsiders to strengthen small business boards.” Harvard Business Review 58: 162–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., and M. Huse. 2000. “Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: an ideological challenge.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 12: 353–378.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., C. M. Dayly, and A. E. Ellstrand. 1996. “Board of directors: a review and research agenda.” Journal of Management 22(3): 409–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathuria, R., et al. 2010. “Competitive priorities and strategic consensus in emerging economies: evidence from India.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 30(8): 879–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, L. H., and C. M. Judd. 1986. Research methods in social relations. New York: CBS College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., and K. A. Sethi. 2005. Doing business in India. USA: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, H., and C. Sahu. (2008). Board structure and size: the impact of changes to Clause 49 in India. U21 Global Working Paper Series, No. 004/(2008) 1.16.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., et al. 2000. “Investor protection and corporate governance.” Journal of Financial Economics 58: 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancinelli, S., and M. Mazzanti. 2009. “Innovation, networking and complementarity: evidence on SME performances for a local economic system in North–Eastern Italy.” Annals of Regional Science 43: 567–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, G. D., D. B. Balkin, and L. Schjoedt. 2001. “Governing the innovation process in entrepreneurial firms.” Journal of High Technology Management Research 12: 273–293.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K.. 1957. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Quantitative data analysis – a source of new methods. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., and J. M. Toulouse. 1996. “Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firm.” Management Science 32(11): 1389–1409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustakallio, M., E. Autio, and S. A. Zahra. 2002. “Relational and contractual governance in family firms: effects on strategic decision making.” Family Business Review 15: 205–222.
   Google Scholar
• Nankervis, A. R., and S. R. Chatterjee. 2011. “The resurgence of China and India: collaboration or competition?” Human Systems Management 30(1–2): 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., M. Gregory, and K. Platts. 1995. “Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 15: 80–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., et al. 2002. Getting the measure of your business. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, F., and A. G. Lank. 1998. The family business: its governance for sustainability. London: McMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nierdekohr, K., and J. Ikeda. 2005. Credit union governance. White Paper. World Council of Credit Union SNC.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, M., and L. Melin. 2002. “The dynamics of family firms: an institutional perspective on corporate governance and strategic change.” In Understanding the small, family firm, edited by D. Fletcher. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. 1999. OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publication Service.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, N., and Y. Zhang. 2008. “Corporate governance reforms in China and India: challenges and opportunities.” Business Horizons 51: 55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajgopal, J. 1999. “Challenges: then and now.” The Hindu Survey of Indian Industry. 39–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy, K., M. Li, and R. Veliyath. 2002. “Variations in ownership behaviour and propensity to diversify: a study of the Indian corporate context.” Strategic Management Journal 23: 345–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, J., and S. Sarkar. 2009. “Multiple board appointments and firm performance in emerging economies: evidence from India.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 17(2): 271–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., M. H. Lubatkin, and R. N. Dino. 2002. “Altruism, agency and the competitiveness of family firms.” Managerial and Decision Economics 23: 247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., et al. 2001. “Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence.” Organisation Science 12(2): 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. A., and L. B. Barnes. 1991. “Outside boards and family businesses: another look.” Family Business Review 4(3): 269–285.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. K., and R. Bhagwat. 2007. “Performance measurement system: case studies from SMEs in India.” International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management 2(4): 475–509.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. K., R. Bhagwat, and G. S. Dangayach. 2005. “Practice of performance measurement: experience from Indian SMEs.” International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business 1(2): 183–213.
   Google Scholar
• Speckbacher, G., J. Bischof, and T. Pfeiffer. 2003. “A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecards in German-speaking countries.” Management Accounting Research 14(4): 361–387.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, T. S. 2005. “The interplay of different levers of control: a case study of introducing a new performance measurement system.” Management Accounting Research 16(3): 293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Tuteja, S. K. 2001. “Partnership for SME development: ancillarisation/subcontracting.” Productivity 42(2): 247–255.
   Google Scholar
• Urlacher, P. V. 2008. New issues in corporate governance. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Heuvel, J., A. Van Gils, and W. Voordeckers. 2006. “Board roles in small and medium-sized family businesses: performance and importance.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 14(5): 467–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, C., N. Tsikriktsis, and M. Frohlich. 2002. “Case research in operational management.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 22(2): 195–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, C. A., et al. 1998. “Made in Europe: small companies.” Business Strategy Review 9(4): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wacker, J. 1998. “A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management.” Journal of Operations Management 16(4): 361–386.
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein, T., and P. A. Kueng. 2002. “A maturity model for performance measure systems.” In Management information systems, edited by C. Brebbia and P. Pascola. Southampton: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research, design and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., D. O. Neubaum, and M. Huse. 2000. “Entrepreneurship in medium sized firm: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems.” Journal of Management 26(5): 947–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 1989. “Board of Directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model.” Journal of Management 15(2): 291–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar