A (meta)governance framework for multi-level governance of inter-organizational project networks

References

• Ahola, Tuomas. 2018. “So Alike yet so Different: A Typology of Interorganisational Projects.” International Journal of Project Management 36 (8): 1007–1018. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, Mats, and Dan Kärreman. 2007. “Constructing Mystery: Empirical Matters in Theory Development.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1265–1281. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, Mats, and Kaj Skoldberg. 2009. “(Post-)Positivism, Social Constructionism, Critical Realism: Three Reference Points in the Philosophy of Science.” In Reflexive Methodology, 15–52. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, Mats, and Kaj Sköldberg. 2009. Reflexive Methodology. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, Chris. 2000. “The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe.” Governance 13 (2): 279–291. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aras, Güler, and David Crowther. 2010. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Broader View of Corporate Governance.” In A Handbook of Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility, edited by G. Aras and D. Crowther. Farnham: Gower Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, Ian, Ian Bartle, and Matthew Flinders. 2016. “Multile-Level Governance.” In Theories of Governance, edited by Chris Ansell and Jacob Torfing, 486–498. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, Jay. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1998. “Philosophy and Scientific Realism.” In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, edited by Margret Archer, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson, and Alan Norrie, 16–47. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 2009. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 2016. Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bixler, R. Patrick. 2014. “It’s Not Just Who You Know, but Can You Tell a Story? The Role of Narratives in Network Governance.” Public Administration Review 74 (2): 277–280. doi:10.1111/puar.12188
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, John. 2020. “Meta Governance of Path Dependencies: Regulation, Welfare, and Markets.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 691 (1): 30–49. doi:10.1177/0002716220949193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Timo, and Jörg Sydow. 2019. “Selecting Organizational Partners for Interorganizational Projects: The Dual but Limited Role of Digital Capabilities in the Construction Industry.” Project Management Journal 50 (4): 398–408. doi:10.1177/8756972819857477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakkol, Mehmet, Kostas Selviaridis, and Max Finne. 2018. “The Governance of Collaboration in Complex Projects.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 38 (4): 997–1019. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-11-2017-0717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagnino, Giovanni Battista, Gabriella Levanti, and Arabella Mocciaro Li Destri. 2016. “Structural Dynamics and Intentional Governance in Strategic Interorganizational Network Evolution: A Multilevel Approach.” Organization Studies 37 (3): 349–373. doi:10.1177/0170840615625706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, James, David Schoorman, and Lex Donaldson. 1997. “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” The Academy of Management Review 22 (1): 20–47. doi:10.4324/9781315261102-29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• DeFillippi, Robert, and Jörg Sydow. 2016. “Project Networks: Governance Choices and Paradoxical Tensions.” Project Management Journal 47 (5): 6–17. doi:10.1177/875697281604700502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denicol, Juliano, Andrew Davies, and Ilias Krystallis. 2020. “What Are the Causes and Cures of Poor Megaproject Performance? A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Project Management Journal 51 (3): 328–345. doi:10.1177/8756972819896113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denicol, Juliano, Andrew Davies, and Stephen Pryke. 2021. “The Organisational Architecture of Megaprojects.” International Journal of Project Management 39 (4): 339–350. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, Roya, Gabriela Fernandes, and Mauro Mancini. 2020. “Evolution of Governance in a Collaborative University–Industry Program.” Project Management Journal 51 (5): 489–504. doi:10.1177/8756972820911245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derkx, Boudewijn, and Pieter Glasbergen. 2014. “Elaborating Global Private Meta-Governance: An Inventory in the Realm of Voluntary Sustainability Standards.” Global Environmental Change 27 (1): 41–50. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.016
   Google Scholar
• Drouin, N., S. Sankaran, Alfons van Marrewijk, and Ralf Müller. 2021. Megaproject Leaders: Reflections on Personal Life Stories, edited by Nathalie Drouin, Shanklar Sankaran, Alfons van Marrewijk, and Ralf Müller. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/megaproject-leaders-9781789902969.html
   Google Scholar
• Easton, Geoff. 2010. “Critical Realism in Case Study Research.” Industrial Marketing Management 39 (1): 118–128. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebers, Mark, and Indre Maurer. 2016. “To Continue or Not to Continue? Drivers of Recurrent Partnering in Temporary Organizations.” Organization Studies 37 (12): 1861–1895. doi:10.1177/0170840616655490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2014. “What You Should Know about Megaprojects and Why : An Overview.” Project Management Journal 45 (2): 6–19. doi:10.1002/pmj.21409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2021. “Top-Ten Behavioral Biases in Project Management: An Overview.” Project Management Journal 52 (6): 531–546. doi:10.1177/87569728211049046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, Nuno, and Jeffrey. K. Pinto. 2018. “Polycentric Organizing and Performance: A Contingency Model and Evidence from Megaproject Planning in the UK.” Research Policy 47 (4): 717–734. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjaltema, Jonna, Robbert Biesbroek, and Katrien Termeer. 2020. “From Government to Governance…to Meta-Governance: A Systematic Literature Review.” Public Management Review 22 (12): 1760–1780. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandori, Anna, and Giuseppe Soda. 1995. “Inter-Firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms.” Organization Studies 16 (2): 183–214. doi:10.1177/017084069501600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellgren, Bo, and Torbjörn Stjernberg. 1995. “Design and Implementation in Major Investments – A Project Network Approach.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 11 (4): 377–394. doi:10.1016/0956-5221(95)00020-V
   Google Scholar
• Hoberecht, Susan, Brett Joseph, Jan Spencer, and Nancy Southern. 2011. “Inter-Organizational Networks: An Emerging Paradigm of Whole Systems Change.” OD Practitioner 43 (4): 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2001. “Types of Multi-Level Governance.” European Integration Online Papers 5 (11): 9163–9170. doi:10.1039/c9sm90238d
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How ? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” The American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3118206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, Robert, Mansour Javidan, and Peter Dorfman. 2001. “Project GLOBE: An Introduction.” Applied Psychology 50 (4): 489–505. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, Mattias, Rolf. A. Lundin, and Anders Söderholm. 2015. “Researching Projects and Theorizing Families of Temporary Organizations.” Project Management Journal 46 (5): 9–18. doi:10.1002/pmj.21520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvensivu, Timo, and Kristian Möller. 2009. “Metatheory of Network Management: A Contingency Perspective.” Industrial Marketing Management 38 (6): 654–661. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2015. “From Governance to Governance Failure and from Multi-Level Governance to Multi-Scalar Meta-Governance.” In Multi-Level Governance: Essential Readings I, edited by Ian Bache and Matthew Flinders, 625–646. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Candace, William S. Hesterly, and Stephen P. Borgatti. 1997. “A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Machanisms.” Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 911–945. doi:10.2307/259249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, Naim, and Qian Hu. 2020. Network Governance: Concepts, Theories, and Applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaulio, Matti A. 2018. “A Psychological Contract Perspective on Project Networks.” Project Management Journal 49 (4): 81–88. doi:10.1177/8756972818781713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Junki. 2006. “Networks, Network Governance, and Networked Networks.” International Review of Public Administration 11 (1): 19–34. doi:10.1080/12294659.2006.10805075
   Google Scholar
• Klaster, Esther, Celeste Wilderom, and Dennis Muntslag. 2018. “Beyond the Network Border: The Emergence of Regional ‘Meta-Networks’ and Their Effects on Dutch Public-Policy Projects.” Project Management Journal 49 (2): 42–55. doi:10.1177/875697281804900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala, Jaakko, Kirsi Aaltonen, Nadezhda Gotcheva, and Pertti Lahdenperä. 2021. “Dimensions of Governance in Interorganizational Project Networks.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 14 (3): 625–651. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-12-2019-0312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejano, Raul, Mrill Ingram, and Helen Ingram. 2014. The Power of Narrative in Environmental Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Yongkui, Yujie Lu, Liang Ma, and Young Hoon Kwak. 2018. “Evolutionary Governance for Mega-Event Projects (MEPs): A Case Study of the World Expo 2010 in China.” Project Management Journal 49 (1): 57–78. doi:10.1177/875697281804900105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Roger, and Brian Hobbs. 2005. “Governance Regimes for Large Projects.” Project Management Journal 36 (3): 42–50. doi:10.1177/875697280503600305
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Peter W. G. 1997. The Management of Projects. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Ralf, J. Rodney Turner, Erling S. Andersen, Jinting Shao, and Øvind Kvalnes. 2014. “Ethics, Trust and Governance in Temporary Organizations.” Project Management Journal 45 (4): 39–54. doi:10.1002/pmj.21432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Ralf. 2017. “Governance Mechanisms in Projects.” In Governance and Governmentality for Projects: Enablers, Practices and Consequences, edited by Ralf Müller, 173–180. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Ralf, Nathalie Drouin, and Shankar Sankaran. 2019a. “Modeling Organizational Project Management.” Project Management Journal 50 (4): 499–513. doi:10.1177/8756972819847876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Ralf, Nathalie Drouin, and Shankar Sankaran. 2019b. Organisational Project Management: Theory and Implementation. Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Ralf, Johannes Glückler, Monique Aubry, and Jingting Shao. 2013. “Project Management Knowledge Flows in Networks of Project Managers and Project Management Offices: A Case Study in the Pharmaceutical Industry.” Project Management Journal 44 (2): 4–19. doi:10.1002/pmj.21326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Ralf, and Øyvind Kvalnes. 2017. “Project Governance and Project Ethics.” In Governance and Governmentality for Projects: Enablers, Practices and Consequences, edited by Ralf Müller, 181–194. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Ralf, Shankar Sankaran, Nathalie Drouin, Anne-Live Vaagaasar, Michiel. C. Bekker, and Karuna Jain. 2018. “A Theory Framework for Balancing Vertical and Horizontal Leadership in Projects.” International Journal of Project Management 36 (1): 83–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, Miguel Linhares, Paulo Serôdio, José Carlos Pinho, and Cândida Lucas. 2016. “The Role of Social Capital towards Resource Sharing in Collaborative R&D Projects: Evidences from the 7th Framework Programme.” International Journal of Project Management 34 (8): 1519–1536. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, Janice K., H. Brinton Milward, Gail Mackean, Ann Casebeer, and Ronald Lindstrom. 2015. Inter-Organizational Networks: A Review of the Literature to Inform Practice, 93–96. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Walter W. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Networks Forms of Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, Keith. G., Amy Fish, and Joerg Sydow. 2007. “Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks.” Journal of Management 33 (3): 479–516. doi:10.1177/0149206307302554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, Keith G., and Patrick Kenis. 2007. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryke, Stephen, Sulafa Badi, Huda Almadhoob, Balamurugan Soundarara, and Simon Addyman. 2018. “Self-Organizing Networks in Complex Infrastructure Projects.” Project Management Journal 49 (2): 18–41. doi:10.1177/875697281804900202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Yumin, Hongquan Chen, Zhaohan Sheng, and Shuping Cheng. 2019. “Governance of Institutional Complexity in Megaproject Organizations.” International Journal of Project Management 37 (3): 425–443. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quah, Jon, and David Seth St. Jones. 2018. Organising the Public Bureaucracy to Ensure Effective Implementation and Compliance with ASEAN Commitments. Singapore: Centre for International Law.
   Google Scholar
• Roehrich, Jens. K., Kostas Selviaridis, Jas Kalra, Wendy Van der Valk, and Feng Fang. 2020. “Inter-Organizational Governance: A Review, Conceptualisation and Extension.” Production Planning & Control 31 (6): 453–469. doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1647364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainati, Tristano, Naomi Brookes, and Giorgio Locatelli. 2017. “Special Purpose Entities in Megaprojects: Empty Boxes or Real Companies?” Project Management Journal 48 (2): 55–73. doi:10.1177/875697281704800205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, Mark, Philip Lewis, and Adrian Thornhill. 2016. Research Methods for Business Students. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Shazi, Rahmat, Nicole Gillespie, and John Steen. 2015. “Trust as a Predictor of Innovation Network Ties in Project Teams.” International Journal of Project Management 33 (1): 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, David, and Richard Whittington. 2014. “Enlarging the Strategy-as-Practice Research Agenda: Towards Taller and Flatter Ontologies.” Organization Studies 35 (10): 1407–1421. doi:10.1177/0170840614541886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šimkonis, Saulius, Ralf Müller, and Raimonda Alonderienė, Alfredas Chmieliauskas, and Margarita Pilkienė. 2021. “Multi-Level Governance in Inter-Organizational Project Settings.” Proceedings of the British Academy of Management (BAM) Conference in the Cloud, August 31 to September 3, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, Chris. 2005. “Jurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism and the Design of Democratic Governance.” Governance 18 (1): 89–110. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Wenyan, Jintao Cao, and Maokuan Zheng. 2016. “Towards an Integrative Framework of Innovation Network for New Product Development Project.” Production Planning & Control 27 (12): 967–978. doi:10.1080/09537287.2016.1167980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, John, Robert DeFillippi, Jörg Sydow, Stephen Pryke, and Ingo Michelfelder. 2018. “Projects and Networks: Understanding Resource Flows and Governance of Temporary Organizations with Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods.” Project Management Journal 49 (2): 3–17. doi:10.1177/875697281804900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swärd, Anna. 2016. “Trust, Reciprocity, and Actions: The Development of Trust in Temporary Inter-Organizational Relations.” Organization Studies 37 (12): 1841–1860. doi:10.1177/0170840616655488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, Jörg. 2003. Dynamik Von Netzwerkorganisationen – Entwicklung, Evolution, Strukturation, 327–356. Schäffer - Poeschel - Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow, Jörg, and Timo Braun. 2018. “Projects as Temporary Organizations : An Agenda for Further Theorizing the Interorganizational Dimension.” International Journal of Project Management 36 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, Jörg, and Arnold Windeler. 2004. “Projektnetzwerke: Management Von (Mehr Als) Temporären Systemen.” In Organisation Der Content-Produktion, edited by Jörg Sydow and Arnold Windeler, 37–54. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tee, Richard, Andrew Davies, and Jennifer Whyte. 2019. “Modular Designs and Integrating Practices: Managing Collaboration through Coordination and Cooperation.” Research Policy 48 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, Jacob. 2016. “Metagovernance.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by Chris Ansell and Jacob Torfing, 525–537. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Rodney. 2020. “How Does Governance Influence Decision Making on Projects and in Project-Based Organizations?” Project Management Journal 51 (6): 670–684. doi:10.1177/8756972820939769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. R. 2022. “Using Principal–Steward Contracting and Scenario Planning to Manage Megaprojects.” Project Management Journal 53 (1): 8–16. doi:10.1177/87569728211061836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, John Rodney, and Yan Xue. 2018. “On the Success of Megaprojects.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 11 (3): 783–805. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-06-2017-0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, Andrew. 2007. Engaged Scholarship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Steve, and Robert Wapshott. 2014. “Critical Realism and the Organizational Case Study.” In Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism, edited by Paul K Edwards, Joe O’Mahoney, and Steve Vincent, 148–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Danwitz, Simon. 2018. “Managing Inter-Firm Projects: A Systematic Review and Directions for Future Research.” International Journal of Project Management 36 (3): 525–541. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Linzhuo, Ralf Müller, and Fangwei Zhu. 2022. “Network Governance for Interorganizational Temporary Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Project Management Journal (OnlineFirst). doi:10.1177/87569728221125924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyer, Johannes, Fabian Adelt, and Sebastian Hoffmann. 2015. Governance of Complex Systems: A Multi-Level Model. 42. Dortmund: Soziologische Arbeitspapiere. doi:10.17877/DE290R-401
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, David. 1989. “What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?” The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 490–495. doi:10.2307/258554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zerjav, Vedran. 2021. “Why Do Business Organizations Participate in Projects? Toward a Typology of Project Value Domains.” Project Management Journal 52 (3): 287–297. doi:10.1177/87569728211001663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar