The promise and problem with open innovation

References

• Bessant , J. and Rush , H. 1995 . Building bridges for innovation: The role of consultants in technology transfer . Research Policy , 24 : 97 – 114 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant , T. and Reenstra-Bryant , R. 1998 . Technology brokers in the North American software industry: Getting the most out of mismatched dyads . International Journal of Technology Management , 16 : 281 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt , R. S. 1995 . Structural holes: The social structure of competition , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson , B. and Stankiewicz , R. 1991 . On the nature, function and composition of technological systems . Journal of Evolutionary Economics , 1 : 93 – 118 .
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough , H. 2003 . Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology , Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press .
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough , H. 2006 . Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape , Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press .
   Google Scholar
• Continua Health Alliance . 2008 . http://www.continuaalliance.org (accessed 19 August 2008). Portland, Oregon
   Google Scholar
• Debackere , K. and Veugelers , R. 2005 . The role of academic technology transfer organisations in improving industry science links . Research Policy , 34 ( 3 ) : 321 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkel , E. , Gassman , O. and Chesbrough , H. 2009 . Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon . R&D Management , 39 ( 4 ) : 311 – 430 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz , J. , Webster , A. , Gebhart , C. and Terra , B. R.C. 2000 . The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm . Research Policy , 29 ( 2 ) : 313 – 30 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman , L. C. 1978 . Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification . Social Networks , 1 : 205 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Gassman , O. 2006 . Opening up the innnovation process: Towards an agenda . R&D Management , 36 ( 3 ) : 223 – 6 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassmann , O. , Enkel , E. and Chesbrough , H. 2010 . Editorial: The future of open innovation . R&D Management , 40 ( 3 ) : 231 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Hackett , S. M. and Dilts , D. M. 2004 . A systematic review of business incubation research . Journal of Technology Transfer , 29 : 55 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon , A. and Sutton , R. 1997 . Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm . Administrative Science Quarterly , 42 : 716 – 49 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon , A. B. 2002 . Brokerage knowledge; linking learning and innovation . Research in Organizational Behavior , 24 : 41 – 85 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells , J. 2006 . Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation . Research Policy , 35 ( 5 ) : 715 – 28 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InnoCentive. 2008. www.innocentive.com (accessed 19 August 2008). Waltham, MA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Lafley , A. G. and Charan , R. 2008 . The game-changer: How you can drive revenue and profit growth with innovation , New York : Crown Business .
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler , U. and Ernst , H. 2008 . Intermediary services in the markets for technology: Organizational antecedents and performance consequences . Organizational Studies , 29 : 1003 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam , M. , Galbraith , B. , McAdam , R. and Humphreys , P. 2006 . Business processes and networks in university incubators: A review and research agendas . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 18 : 451 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily , B. and Zaheer , A. 1999 . Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities . Strategic Management Journal , 20 : 371 – 89 .
   Google Scholar
• Morgan , E. and Crawford , N. 1996 . Technology brokering activities in Europe – a survey . International Journal of Technology Management , 12 ( 3 ) : 360 – 7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell , W. W. , Koput , K. W. and Smith-Doerr , L. 1996 . Interorganisational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology . Administrative Science Quarterly , 41 : 116 – 45 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers , E. M. 1995 . Diffusion of Innovation , New York : Free Press .
   Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz , R. 1995 . “ The role of the science and technology infrastructure in the development and diffusion of industrial automation in Sweden ” . In Technological systems and economic performance: The case of factory automation , Edited by: Carlsson , B. 165 – 210 . Dordrecht : Kluwer .
   Google Scholar
• Stewart , J. 2007 . Local experts in the domestication of ICTs . Information Communication and Society , 10 ( 4 ) : 547 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• Trott , P. and Hartmann , D. 2009 . Why ‘open innovation’ is old wine in new bottles . International Journal of Innovation Management , 13 ( 4 ) : 715 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel , E. 1986 . Lead users: A source of novel product concepts . Management Science , 32 ( 7 ) : 791 – 805 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Zedtwitz , M. 2003 . Classification and management of incubators: Aligning strategic objectives and competitive scope for new business facilitation . International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Managment , 3 ( 1–2 ) : 176 – 96 .
   Google Scholar
• Winch , G. and Courtney , R. 2007 . The organisation of innovation brokers: An international review . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 19 ( 6 ) : 747 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Your Encore. 2008. yourencore.com (accessed 19 August 2008). Indianapolis, USA
   Google Scholar