The use and development of indicators for the commercialisation of university research in a national support programme

References

• Arundel, A., and C. Bordoy. 2007. Developing internationally comparable indicators for the commercialization of publicly-funded research. UNU-MERIT Working Paper No. 18. Maastricht, The Netherlands: UNU-MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkesjø, T., and K. Vareide. 2004. Evaluering av kommersialiseringsenhetene i FORNY-programmet, 225. Bø: Telemarksforsking.
   Google Scholar
• Borlaug, S.B., L. Grünfeld, M. Gulbrandsen, E. Rasmussen, L. Rønning, O.R. Spilling, and E. Vinogradov. 2009. Between entrepreneurship and technology transfer: Evaluation of the FORNY programme. Report 19/2009. Oslo: NIFU STEP.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman , B. 2000 . Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory . Research Policy , 29 : 627 – 655 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen , T. and Rasmussen , E. 2011 . Open innovation policy through intermediaries: The industry incubator programme in Norway . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 23 : 75 – 85 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzens , S. E. and Melkers , J. E. 1997 . Use and usefulness of performance measurement in state science and technology programs . Policy Studies Journal , 25 : 425 – 35 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk , R. 2007 . Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms’ innovation activities – survey evidence from Austria . Research Policy , 36 : 665 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna , A. and Muscio , A. 2009 . The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature . Minerva , 47 ( 1 ) : 93 – 114 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna , A. and Nesta , L. J.J. 2006 . University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence . Research Policy , 35 : 790 – 807 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin , B. 2003 . The emergence of S&T indicators: Why did governments supplement statistics with indicators? . Research Policy , 32 : 679 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman , G. and McCarthy , S. 2006 . Business development support and knowledge-based businesses . The Journal of Technology Transfer , 31 ( 1 ) : 131 – 43 .
   Google Scholar
• Hervik , A. , Arnestad , M. and Wicksteed , B. 1997 . Evaluering av FORNY-programmet, 92. Molde: Møreforskning .
   Google Scholar
• Langford , C. H. , Hall , J. , Josty , P. , Matos , S. and Jacobson , A. 2006 . Indicators and outcomes of canadian university research: Proxies becoming goals? . Research Policy , 35 : 1586 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen , T. 1998 . The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes . Research Policy , 27 : 599 – 610 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers , J. 2004 . Assessing the outcomes of state science and technology organizations . Economic Development Quarterly , 18 : 186 – 201 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molas-Gallart, J., A. Salter, P. Patel, A. Scott, and X. Duran. 2002. Measuring third stream activities: Final report to the Russell group of universities, 97. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Mosey , S. , Lockett , A. and Westhead , P. 2006 . Creating network bridges for university technology transfer: The Medici fellowship programme . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 18 : 71 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery , D. C. and Sampat , B. N. 1980 . The Bayh–Dole Act of and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? . The Journal of Technology Transfer , 30 : 115 – 27 .
   Google Scholar
• Mustar , P. , Wright , M. and Clarysse , B. 2008 . University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in europe . Science and Public Policy , 35 ( 2 ) : 67 – 80 .
   Google Scholar
• Nosella , A. and Grimaldi , R. 2009 . University-level mechanisms supporting the creation of new companies: An analysis of italian academic spin-offs . Technology Analysis and Strategic Management , 21 : 679 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen , E. 2006 . Two models for university technology transfer operation: Patent agency and 2G . International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation , 5 : 291 – 307 .
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen , E. , Borch , O.J. and Sørheim , R. 2008 . “ University entrepreneurship and government support schemes ” . In The dynamic between entrepreneurship, environment and education , Edited by: Fayolle , A. and Kyrö , P. 105 – 30 . Cheltenham : Edward Elgar .
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen , E. , Moen , Ø. and Gulbrandsen , M. 2006 . Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge . Technovation , 26 : 518 – 33 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmenkaita , J.-P. and Salo , A. 2002 . Rationales for government interventions in the commercialization of new technologies . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 14 : 183 – 200 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo , A. , Mild , P. and Pentikainen , T. 2006 . Exploring causal relationships in an innovation program with robust portfolio modeling . Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 73 : 1028 – 44 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter , S. and Leslie , L. L. 1997 . Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university , Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen , J. and Chambers , D. 2008 . Evaluating academic technology transfer performance by how well access to knowledge is facilitated – defining an access metric . The Journal of Technology Transfer , 33 : 534 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M., B. Clarysse, P. Mustar, and A. Lockett, eds. 2007 Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar