Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy

REFERENCES

• Bergek, A., M. Hekkert, and S. Jacobsson. 2008. Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers. In Innovation for a low carbon economy: Economic, institutional and management approaches, . T. Foxon, J. Köhler, and C. Oughton, 79–111. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne. 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37 , 3: 407–29. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, M. Hekkert, and K. Smith. 2010. Functionality of innovation systems as a rationale for and guide to innovation policy. In The theory and practice of innovation policy. An international research handbook, Smits, R. S. Kuhlmann, and P. Shapira, 115–44. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, and B. Sandén. 2008. ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: Two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 , 5: 575–92. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braczyk, H.J., P.N. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich. 1998. Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world. London: University College of London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Malerba. 1997. Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In Systems of innovations: Technology, institutions and organizations, C. Edquist, 188–221. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H.S., P. Vergragt, K. Green, and L. Berchicci. 2003. Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 , 3: 291–315. doi: 10.1080/09537320310001601496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B. 1995. Technological systems and economic performance: The case of factory automation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-0145-5
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., and S. Jacobsson. 1997. Variety and technology policy – how do technological systems originate and what are the policy conclusions? In Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, C. Edquist, 266–97. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 , 2: 93–118. doi: 10.1007/BF01224915
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., and F.D. Lopez. 2010. Comparing systems approaches to innovation and technological change for sustainable and competitive economies: An explorative study into conceptual commonalities, differences and complementarities. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 , 12: 1149–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., and G. Uranga. 1997. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy 26, 4–5: 475–91. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organisations. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2005. Systems of innovation. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, J. Fagelberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, 181–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farla, J., F. Alkemade, and R.A.A. Suurs. 2010. Analysis of barriers in the transition toward sustainable mobility in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77 , 8: 1260–9. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farla, J., J. Markard, R. Raven, and L. Coenen. 2012. Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 , 6: 991–8. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra, and M. Laranja. 2011. Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy 40 , 5: 702–13. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1995. The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 , 1: 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F., and R. Raven. 2006. Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 , 3: 375–92. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31, 8–9: 1257–74. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., M.P. Hekkert, and S. Jacobsson. 2008. The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20 , 5: 521–36. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., and J. Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36 , 3: 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M.P. 2010. The challenge of sustainable innovation policy. In New economic ground for innovation policy, ed. L. Elg and J. Leijten, 97–116. Spain: Cultivalibros.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M.P., and S.O. Negro. 2009. Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 , 4: 584–94. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M.P., R.A.A. Suurs, S.O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. Smits. 2007. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 , 4: 413–32. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, K., M. Nilsson, A. Rickne, and T. Magnusson. 2011. Fostering sustainable technologies: A framework for analysing the governance of innovation systems. Science and Public Policy 38 , 5: 403–15. doi: 10.3152/030234211X12960315267499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. Schot, and B. Truffer. 2002. Experimenting for sustainable transport. The approach of strategic niche management transport, development and sustainability. London: SPON Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. Schot, and B. Truffer. 2004. Experimenting for sustainable transport. The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 16 , 4: 561–6. doi: 10.1080/0953732042000295847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, L., M. Winskel, and S. Allen. 2011. The hesitant emergence of low carbon technologies in the UK: The micro-CHP innovation system. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23 , 3: 297–312. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.550396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. 2001. Functions in innovation system approaches. Paper for DRUID's Nelson–Winter conference, June 12–15, in Denmark, Aalborg.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and J. Grin. 2009. Opschaling van transitie-experimenten en verankering van systeeminnovaties (concept). Rotterdam/Delft, NL: Kenniscentrum duurzame systeeminnovaties en transities (KCT).
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and D. Loorbach. 2003. Governance for sustainability through transition management. Open meeting of human dimensions of global environmental change research community, October 16–19, in Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and D. Loorbach. 2006. Transition management: A reflexive governance approach. In Reflexive governance for sustainable development, ed. Jp. Voss, B. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, 103–30. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., D. Loorbach, and J. Rotmans. 2007. Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 14 , 1: 78–91. doi: 10.1080/13504500709469709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 , 2: 175–98. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R., Klein Woolthuis, M. Lankhuizen, and V. Gilsing. 2005. A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation 25 , 6: 609–19. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2007. Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. PhD diss., University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2010. Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23 , 1: 161–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. 1992. National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31 , 2: 247–64. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41 , 6: 955–67. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37 , 4: 596–615. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiolik, J., J. Markard, and M. Hekkert. 2012. Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 , 6: 1032–48. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negro, S.O., F. Alkemade, and M. Hekkert. 2012. Why does renewable energy diffuse so slowly? A review of innovation system problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 , 6: 3836–46. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negro, S.O., M.P. Hekkert, and R.E.H.M. Smits. 2008. Stimulating renewable energy technologies by innovation policy. Science and Public Policy 35 , 6: 403–16. doi: 10.3152/030234208X323334
   Google Scholar
• Negro, S.O., R.A.A. Suurs, and M.P. Hekkert. 2008. The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75 , 1: 57–77. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R. 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., K. Hillman, and T. Magnusson. 2012. How do we govern sustainable innovations? Mapping patterns of governance for biofuels and hybrid-electric vehicle technologies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 3, June: 50–66. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R. 2005. Strategic niche management for biomass. Dissertation/thesis, PhD thesis, Eindhoven Technical University, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., and G. Verbong. 2007. Multi-regime interactions in the Dutch energy sector: The case of combined heat and power technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 , 4: 491–507. doi: 10.1080/09537320701403441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 1995. Introduction of new technology: Making use of recent insights from sociology and economics of technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7 , 4: 417–32. doi: 10.1080/09537329508524223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. Technological change. In Human Choice and Climate Change: An international assessment, vol. 2, ed. S. Rayner and E.L. Malone, 327–99. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. Van Asselt. 2001. More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight: The Journal of Future Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy 3 , 1: 15–31. doi: 10.1108/14636680110803003
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F.W. Geels. 2008. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 , 5: 537–54. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G.P. Walker. 2007. Caution! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice and transition management. Environment and Planning A 39 , 4: 763–70. doi: 10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and R. Raven. 2012. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy 41 , 2012: 1025–36. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34 , 10: 1491–510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, R., S. Kuhlmann, and M. Teubal. 2010. A system-evolutionary apporach for innovation systems. In The theory and practice of innovation policy, R. Smits, 419–50. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. 2011. Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change 21 , 3: 813–22. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taanman, M. 2008. Looking for transitions: Background, framework and application of transition monitoring for the Dutch energy transition. Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change, February 22–23, in Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, G.C. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28 , 12: 817–30. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alphen, K., M.P. Hekkert, and W.C. Turkenburg. 2009. Accelerating the deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies by strengthening the innovation system. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4 , 2: 396–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alphen, K., P.M. Noothou, M.P. Hekkert, and W.C. Turkenburg. 2010. Evaluating the development of carbon capture and storage technologies in the United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 , 3: 971–86. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berghn, J.C.J.M., B. Truffer,and G. Kallis. 2011. Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 , 1: 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Van der Laak, W.W.M., R.P.J.M. Raven, and G.P.J. Verbong. 2007. Strategic niche management for biofuels: Analysing past experiments for developing new biofuel policies. Energy Policy 35 , 2007: 3213–25. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., A. Smith, and J. Grin. 2009. Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences 42 , 4: 275–302. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K.M., and H. Rohracher. 2012. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy 41 , 6: 1037–47. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, A.J., and M.P. Hekkert. 2012. Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy 39 , 2012: 47–87.
   Google Scholar