Patent assertion entities: do they impede innovation and technology commercialisation?

References

• Allison, J.R., M.A. Lemley, and J. Walker. 2011. Patent quality and settlement among repeat patent litigants. Georgetown Law Journal 99, no. 3: 678–712.
   Google Scholar
• Baden-Fuller, C., and M.S. Morgan. 2010. Business models as models. Long Range Planning 43, nos. 2–3: 156–71. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen, J., J. Ford, and M.J. Meurer. 2011–2012. The private and social costs of patent trolls. Regulation: The Cato Review of Business and Government 34, no. 4: 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bessen, James, and Michael J. Meurer. 2008. Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bessen, J., and M.J. Meurer. 2012. The direct costs from NPE disputes. Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12–34, School of Law, Boston University.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, J. 2012. “Defensive patent license” created to protect innovators from trolls. Ars Technica, June 12. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/defensive-patent-license-created-toprotect-innovators-from-trolls/ (acc- essed March 4, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, T.L. 2012. The America invents act: Slaying trolls, limiting joinder. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 25, no. 2: 673–95.
   Google Scholar
• de Carvalho, N.P. 2013. Comments on PAEs activities. Director, IP and Competition Policy Division, World Intellectual Property Organization, Response to Patent Assertion Entity Activities Workshop, Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice, December 10, 2012, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, C.V. 2012. Startups and patent trolls. Santa Clara Law Digital Commons, School of Law, Santa Clara University, September 13. http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/553 (accessed March 13, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Chien, C.V., and M.A. Lemley. 2012. Patent holdup, the ITC, and the public interest. Cornell Law Review 98, no. 1: 1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, I.M. 2012. Patent assertion entities. Patent Assertion Entity Activities Workshop, Sponsored by the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, December 10, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission. 2011. The evolving IP marketplace: Aligning patent notice and remedies with competition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• George, G., and A.J. Bock. 2011. The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35, no. 1: 83–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00424.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, E. 2012. How to fix software patents (part 3 of 3). Forbes, June 12. http://forbescom/sites/ericgoldman/2012/12/12/how-to-fix-software-patents/print/ (accessed February 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hemphill, T.A. 1992. Self-regulating industry behavior: Antitrust limitations and trade association codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 11, no. 12: 915–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00871957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosteny, J.N. 2013. A patent assertion entity: One size doesn't fit all. Intellectual Property Today 20, no. 1: 14–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, E., G. Slowinski, S. Matthews, and E. Gilmont. 2010. Business models for collaborative research. Research-Technology Management 53, no. 6: 51–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, S.P., and R. Kinder. 2012. Securing insurance coverage for patent infringement lawsuits under CGL insurance policies could save millions. Intellectual Property Today, March, 13–5.
   Google Scholar
• IPNAV. 2013. DOJ/FTC investigating patent assertion entities? January 8. http://www.ipnav.com/blog/dojftc.investigating-patent-assertion-entities/ (accessed February 17, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jeruss, S., R. Feldman, and J. Walker. 2012. The America Invents Act 500: Effects of patent monetization entities on U.S. litigation. Duke Law & Technology Review 11, no. 2: 357–89.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., C. Christensen, and H. Kagermann. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review 86, no. 12: 50–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharif, O. 2013. Recruiting an army to battle the patent trolls. BloombergBusinessweek, January 21, 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Krajelis, B. 2012. Reform aside, experts say suits from patent trolls continue to increase. Legal Newsline Legal Journal, December 4. http://legalnewsline.com/in-the-spotlight/238230-reform-aside-experts-say-suits-from-patent-trolls-continue-to-increase (accessed March 2, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Leff, B. 2013. Comments on patent assertion entity activities. Federal Trade Commission and Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice, February, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Love, B. 2012. Let's use patent fees to stop patent trolls. Wired, December 20. http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/12/how-to-stop-patent-trolls-lets-use-fees/ (accessed January 18, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Magretta, J. 2002. Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review 80, no. 5: 86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, J.F. 2006. The myth of the patent troll: An alternative view of the function of patent dealers in an idea economy. Emory Law Journal 56, no. 1: 189–228.
   Google Scholar
• Meland, M. 2006. IP litigation yielded $ 3.4B in 2006: Survey. IPLaw360, December 29. http://invotex.com/assets/06IPSurvey.pdf (accessed January 13, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Messinger, A. 2012. Introducing the innovator's patent agreement. Twitter Blog, April 17. https://blogtwitter.com/2012/introducing-innovators=patent-agreement (accessed February 6, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Millien, R., and R. Laurie. 2007. A summary of established & emerging IP business models. Paper presented at the eight annual Sedona conference on patent litigation, October 12, in Sedona, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Milone, C. 2012. A powerful new weapon against patent trolls. Forbes, November 15. http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2012/11/15/a-powerful-new-weapon-against-patent-trolls/ (accessed January 7, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Miotke, J.T. 2010. The emerging intellectual property market place & the benefit for businesses and universities. American Intellectual Property Law Association Meeting, October 21–23, in Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., M. Schindehutte, and J. Allen. 2005. The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research 58, no. 6: 726–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhrvold, N. 2010. The big idea: Funding eureka! Harvard Business Review 88, no. 3: 40–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocean Tomo LP. 2011. Ocean Tomo's annual study of intangible asset market value – 2010. April 4. http://www.oceantomo.com/media/newsreleases/intangible_asset_market_value_2010 (accessed January 31, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J. 2012. Intellectual property strategy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• PWC. 2012. 2012. Patent litigation study: Litigation continues to rise amid awareness of patent value. New York, NY: PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Rassenfosse, G.D. 2012. How SMEs exploit their intellectual property assets: Evidence from survey data. Small Business Economics 39, no. 2: 437–52. doi: 10.1007/s11187-010-9313-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risch, M. 2012. Patent troll myths. Seton Hall Law Review 42, no. 2: 457–99.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, J., and J.M. Urban. 2012. Protecting open innovation: The defensive patent license as a new approach to patent threats, transaction costs, and tactical disarmament. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 26, no. 1: 1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, S.M., H.J. Smith, and J.C. Linder. 2005. The power of business models. Business Horizons 48, no. 3: 199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.014
   Google Scholar
• Simcoe, T.S. 2012. Patent assertion entities: Potential efficiencies. Paper presented at the Patent Assertion Entity Activities Workshop, Sponsored by the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, December 10, in Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Skitol, R.A. 2012. FTC-DOJ Workshop on Patent Assertion Entity Activities: Fresh thinking on potential antitrust responses to abusive patent troll enforcement practices. DrinkerBiddle: Antitrust Client Alert, December 14. http://www.drinkerbiddle.com/resources/publications/2012/ftc-doj-patents-workshop?Section=Events (accessed February 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning 43, nos. 2–3: 172–94. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The H Open. 2013. Twitter puts patent agreement into practice. The H Open, May 24. http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Twitter-puts-patent-agreement-into-practice-1869045.html (accessed May 25, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. 2011. Patent trolls and technology diffusion. Working Paper (November 23), Management Science, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• United States International Trade Commission. 2012. Facts and trends regarding USITC section 337 investigations. June 18. http://www.usitc.gov/press_room/documents/featured_news/337/facts.pdf (accessed April 13, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• United States International Trade Commission. 2013. About the USITC. http://www.usitc.gov/press_room/about_usitc.htm (accessed April 13, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Victor, K. 2013. Patent litigation gets attention of FTC, DOJ. FTC Watch, January 31. http://www.ftcwatch.com/ (accessed February 18, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. 2007. Value, protect, exploit: How managing intellectual property can build and sustain competitive advantage. A Deloitte Research Technology, Media and Telecommunications Study. http://www.deloitte,com/assets/Documents/BG_tmt_ManagingIP_160807.pdf (accessed April 25, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organization. 2011. 2011 World intellectual property report: The changing face of innovation., Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. 2012. What is the fuss about patent trolls? OC Patent Lawyer, January 10. http://ocpatentlawyer.com/what-is-the-fuss-about-patent-trolls/print/ (accessed March 16, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, B.T. 2012. An overview of the ‘patent trolls’ debate. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress: 7–5700, R42668, August 20. http://www.crs.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Zot, C., and R. Amit. 2008. The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 29, no. 1: 1–26. doi: 10.1002/smj.642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar