Intersections in system innovation: a nested-case methodology to study co-evolving innovation journeys

References

• Akrich, M., M. Callon, and B. Latour. 2002a. The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management 6, no. 2: 187–206. doi: 10.1142/S1363919602000550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., M. Callon, and B. Latour. 2002b. The key to success in innovation part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management 6, no. 2: 207–25. doi: 10.1142/S1363919602000562
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., and M. Haverland. 2012. Designing case studies; explanatory approaches in small-N research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buijs, J.M., J. Eshuis, and D. Byrne. 2009. Approaches to researching complexity in public management. In Managing complex governance systems: Dynamics, self-organization and coevolution in public investments, ed. G. Teisman, A. van Buuren and L. Gerrits, 37–55. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. 2005. Complexity, configurations and cases. Theory, Culture & Society 22, no. 5: 95–110. doi: 10.1177/0263276405057194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. 2009. Complex realist and configurational approaches to cases: A radical synthesis. In The SAGE handbook of case-based methods, ed. D. Byrne and C. Ragin, 101–11. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., and C. Ragin, eds. 2009. The SAGE handbook of case-based methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. 2005. Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society 22, no. 5: 255–67. doi: 10.1177/0263276405058052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., P. Benneworth, and B. Truffer. 2012.Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy 41, no. 6: 968–979. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. 2010. Destination unknown: Pursuing sustainable mobility in the face of rival societal aspirations. Research Policy 39, no. 4: 459–70. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., and L.-E. Gadde. 2002. Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research 55, no. 7: 553–60. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., and M.E. Graebner. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50, no. 1: 25–32. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farla, F., J. Markard, R. Raven, and L. Coenen. 2012. Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 79, no. 6: 991–8. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12, no. 2: 219–45. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and J. Gehman. 2012. Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational. Research Policy 41, no. 6: 980–95. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2009. Foundational ontologies and multi-paradigm analysis, applied to the socio-technical transition from mixed farming to intensive pig husbandry (1930–1980). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 21, no. 7: 805–32. doi: 10.1080/09537320903182280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2010. Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy 39, no. 4: 495–510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., M.P. Hekkert, and S. Jacobsson. 2008. The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20, no. 5: 521–36. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., and R. Raven. 2006. Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, nos. 3–4: 375–92. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., and J. Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36, no. 3: 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., and J. Schot. 2010. The dynamics of transitions: A socio-technical perspective. In Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change, ed J. Grin, J. Rotmans and J. Schot, 9–101. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Genus, A., and A. Coles. 2008. Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy 37, no. 9: 1436–45. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 1994. Car traffic at the crossroads: New technologies for cars, traffic systems, and their interlocking. In Changing large technical systems, ed. J. Summerton, 265–89. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1995. Politics on the move: The democratic control of the design of sustainable technologies. Knowledge & Policy 8, no. 4: 26–39. doi: 10.1007/BF02832228
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, M., N. Longhurst, and G. Seyfang. 2013. Up, down, round and round: Connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability. Environment and Planning A 45: 402–20. doi: 10.1068/a45124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2010. Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and would we know if they were? Research Policy 39, no. 4: 477–85. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J.H. 1996. Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, U. 2012. Mapping and navigating transitions – the multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy 41: 996–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10, no. 2: 175–98. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., and M. Howlett. 2009. Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences 42, no. 4: 391–408. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., B. Truffer, and J.P. Voß. 2008. Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: Evidence from German utility sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production 16: 1190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. 1997. Sustainable technological developments and second-order cybernetics. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 9, no. 3: 329–41. doi: 10.1080/09537329708524288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1986. Ökologische Kommunikation: kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1995. Social systems. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, A. 2012. Heterogeneity of lock-in and the role of strategic technological interventions in urban infrastructural transformations. European Planning Studies 20, no. 3: 441–60. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Science 42, no. 4: 323–40. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B. 2012. System innovation as synchronization: Innovation attempts in the Dutch traffic management field. PhD diss., Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Pel, B., and F. Boons. 2010. Transition through subsystem innovation? The case of traffic management. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 77, no. 8: 1249–59. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B., G. Teisman, and F. Boons. 2012. Transition by translation: The Dutch traffic intelligence innovation cascade. In Automobility in transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport, F.W. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, and G. Lyons, 235–251. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penna, C., and F. Geels. 2012. Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 79, no. 6: 999–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., and H. Becker. 1992. What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, W. 2000. Ritardando and accelerando in reflexive innovation, or how networks synchronize the tempi of technological innovation. TUTS-working papers, Berlin WP-7–2000.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R. 2007. Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: An assessment of differences and pitfalls. Energy Policy 35, no. 4: 2390–400. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R., and G. Verbong. 2007. Multi-regime interactions in the Dutch energy sector: The case of combined heat and power technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19, no. 4: 491–507. doi: 10.1080/09537320701403441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R., and G. Verbong. 2009. Boundary crossing innovations: Case studies from the energy domain. Technology in Society 31: 85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., G. Verbong, W. Schilpzand, and M. Witkamp. 2011. Translation mechanisms in socio-technical niches: A case study of Dutch river management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23, no. 10: 1063–78. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.621305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., and C. Ragin, eds. 2009. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 2006. A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance and its ironies. In Reflexive governance for sustainable development, ed. J. Voß, R. Kemp and D. Bauknecht, 82–100. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Røpke, I. 2012. The unsustainable directionality of innovation – The example of the broadband transition. Research Policy 41, no. 9: 1631–1642. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J. 2006. Societal innovation: Between dream and reality lies complexity. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., and D. Loorbach. 2010. Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance: A systemic and reflexive approach. In Transitions to sustainable development; new directions in the study of long term transformative change, ed. J. Grin, J. Rotmans and J. Schot, 105–220. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandén, B., and K. Hillman. 2011. A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Research Policy 40, no. 3: 403–14. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. 2000. Evaluation in complex policy systems. Evaluation 6, no. 4: 433–54. doi: 10.1177/13563890022209415
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F. W. Geels. 2008. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys; theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20, no. 5: 537–54. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., R. Hoogma, and B. Elzen. 1994. Strategies for shifting technological systems – the case of the automobile system. Futures 26, no. 10: 1060–76. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90073-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2012. The shadowy side of innovation: Unmaking and sustainability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24, no. 4: 363–75. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2007. Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19, no. 4: 427–50. doi: 10.1080/09537320701403334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and R. Raven. 2012. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy 41, no. 6: 1025–36. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., and H. Rohracher. 2010. ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures. Research Policy 39, no. 4: 449–58. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2009. Direction, distribution and diversity! Pluralising progress in innovation, sustainability and development. STEPS working paper 32, Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2011. Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1, no. 1: 82–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., A. van Buuren, and L. Gerrits, eds. 2009. Managing complex governance systems: Dynamics, self-organization and coevolution in public investments. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, C., and A. Dewulf. 2009. Theoretical multiplicity for the governance of transitions: The energy producing greenhouse case. Paper presented at the IRSPM conference, April 6–8, in Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasileiadou, E., and K. Safarzynska. 2010. Transitions: Taking complexity seriously. Futures 42, no. 10: 1176–86. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbong, G., F. W. Geels, and R. Raven. 2008. Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970–2006): Hype-cycles, closed networks and technology-focused learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20, no. 5: 555–73. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, S., and L. Gerrits. 2013. Understanding and researching complexity with qualitative comparative analysis: Evaluating transportation infrastructure projects. Evaluation 19, no. 1: 40–55. doi: 10.1177/1356389012470682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walby, S. 2007. Complexity, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37, no. 4: 449–70. doi: 10.1177/0048393107307663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar