Mapping the emerging field of genome editing

References

• Bogdanove, A.J., and Daniel F. Voytas. 2011. TAL effectors: Customizable proteins for DNA targeting. Science 333, no. 6051: 1843–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1204094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekharan, S., S. Kumar, C.M. Valley, and A. Rai. 2009. Proprietary science, open science and the role of patent disclosure: the case of zinc-finger proteins. Nature Biotechnology 27: 140–4. doi: 10.1038/nbt0209-140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrick, G.E., and V. Pavone. 2013. Democratising research evaluation: Achieving greater public engagement with bibliometrics-informed peer review. Science and Public Policy 40, no. 5: 563–75. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esvelt, K.M., and H.H. Wang. 2013. Genome-scale engineering for systems and synthetic biology. Molecular Systems Biology 9: 641–57. doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, H., J. Smith, M. Yang, S. Jones, V. Djukanovic, M.G. Nicholson, A. West, D. Bidney, S.C. Falco, and D. Jantz. 2010. Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease. The Plant Journal 61, no. 1: 176–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04041.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., C. Xu, L. Huang, and A.L. Porter. 2009. Profiling research patterns for a newly emerging science and technology: dye-sensitized solar cells. Working Paper, Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, October 2–3, 2009. http://stip.gatech.edu/category/publications/workingpapers (accessed October 20, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Kostoff, R.N., R.G. Koytcheff, and G.C.Y. Lau. 2007. Technical structure of the global nanoscience and nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9, no. 5: 701–24. doi: 10.1007/s11051-007-9224-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzma, J., and A. Kokotovich. 2011. Renegotiating GM crop regulation. EMBO Reports 12, no. 9: 883–8. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusser, M., and H.V. Davies. 2013. Comparative regulatory approaches for groups of new plant breeding techniques. New Biotechnology 30, no. 5: 437–46. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2000. Genetically modified pest-protected plants: Science and regulation. Washington, DC: National Research Council. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2002. Environmental effects of transgenic plants: The scope and adequacy of regulation. Washington, DC: National Research Council. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, P., S. Hall, and G. Burton. 2012. Synthetic biology: Mapping the scientific landscape. Plos One 7, no. 4: e34368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OSTP. 1986. Office of science and technology policy. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; Announcement of policy; Notice for public comment, 51 Federal Register 23302 (June 26, 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Pennisi, E. 2012. The tale of the TALEs. Science 338: 1408–11. doi: 10.1126/science.338.6113.1408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porter, A.L., and S.W. Cunningham. 2004. Tech-mining: Exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A.L., J. Youtie, and P. Shapira. 2007. Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10, no. 5: 715–28. doi: 10.1007/s11051-007-9266-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porteus, M.H. 2009. Plant biotechnology: Zinc fingers on target. Nature 459, no. 7245: 337–8. doi: 10.1038/459337a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A.W., and R. Sparrow. 2008. The case for regulating intragenic GMOs. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Ethics 21: 153–81. doi: 10.1007/s10806-007-9074-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, H.J., F.A. Krens, and E. Jacobsen. 2006. Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants. EMBO Reports 7: 750–3. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla, V.K., Y. Doyon, J.C. Miller, R.C. DeKelver, E.A. Moehle, S.E. Worden, J.C. Mitchell, N.L. Arnold, S. Gopalan, and X. Meng. 2009. Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using Zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459: 437–41. doi: 10.1038/nature07992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J.A., D.A. Wright, R.J. Winfrey, F. Fu, M.L. Maeder, J.K. Joung, and D.F. Voytas. 2009. High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered Zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459: 442–5. doi: 10.1038/nature07845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. 1987, 1997. Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced through Genetic Engineering which are Plant Pests or which there is Reason to Believe are Plant Pests, 7 C.F.R. § 340.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2011. Correspondence Concerning Regulatory Status of 7 CFR Part 340. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/foia/efoia.php. (accessed October 20, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Emily. 2012. Tiptoeing around transgenics. Nature Biotechnology 30, no. 3: 215–7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H.H., and G.M. Church. 2011. Multiplexed genome engineering and genotyping methods applications for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. Methods Enzymology 498: 409–26. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385120-8.00018-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar