Technological variation and the US renewable fuel standard

References

• Abebe, Mimi. 2008. History of ethanol. In Ethanol: Salvation or damnation?, ed. Emily Anderson and Michaela Vander Weil, 24–27. Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Journalism and Mass Communications. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=journalismstudent
   Google Scholar
• Aden, Andy, and Thomas Foust. 2009. Technoeconomic analysis of the dilute sulfuric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis process for the conversion of corn stover to ethanol. Cellulose 16: 535–545. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9327-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberta Renewable Diesel Demonstration. 2009. Final report. Calgary: Climate Change Central.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 1949. Plane in a minute climbs 13,000 feet. New York Times, January 8.
   Google Scholar
• Carere, Carlo R., Richard Sparling, Nazim Cicek, and David B. Levin. 2008. Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 9: 1342–1360. doi: 10.3390/ijms9071342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Yi-Wen, Brian Walseth, and Sangwon Suh. 2009. Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 43, no. 8: 2688–2692. doi: 10.1021/es8031067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estill, Lyle. 2005. Biodiesel power: The passion, the people, and the politics of the next renewable fuel. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fabiosa, Jacinto F., John C. Beghin, Fengxia Dong, Amani Elobeid, Simla Tokgoz, and Tun-Hsiang Yu. 2010. Land allocation effects of the global ethanol surge: Predictions from the International FAPRI model. Land Economics 86, no. 4: 687–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2008. Biofuels: Prospects, risks and opportunities, the State of food and agriculture. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Christopher, and Carlota Perez. 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical change and economic theory, ed. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete, 38–66. London: Pinter Publishers Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank. 2005. The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17, no. 4: 445–476. doi: 10.1080/09537320500357319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank. 2006. Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: A multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850–1930). Technology in Society 28: 445–476. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank. 2010. Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and multi-level perspective. Research Policy 39: 495–510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank, and Johan Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36: 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank, and Johan Schot. 2010. The dynamics of transitions: A socio-technical perspective. In Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change, ed.John Grin, Jan Rotmans, and Johan Schot, 11–101. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Global Subsidies Initiative. 2007. Biofuels – At what cost? International Institute for Sustainable Development. http://www.iisd.org/gsi/biofuel-subsidies/biofuels-what-cost (accessed April 21, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Global Subsidies Initiative. 2012. Fossil fuels – At what cost? International Institute for Sustainable Development. http://www.iisd.org/gsi/fossil-fuel-subsidies/fossil-fuels-what-cost (accessed April 21, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gnansounou, Edgard. 2011. Assessing the sustainability of biofuels: A logic-based model. Energy 36: 2089–2096. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of the United States of America. 2007. Twenty in ten: Strengthen America's energy security. In State of the union address. Washington, DC: The White House. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/stateoftheunion/2007/initiatives/energy.html (accessed October 16, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Groom, Martha J., Elizabeth M. Gray, and Patricia A. Townsend. 2008. Biofuels and biodiversity: principles for creating better policies for biofuel production. Conservation Biology 22, no. 3: 602–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00879.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamelinck, Carlo, and André P.C. Faaij. 2006. Outlook for advanced biofuels. Energy Policy 34: 3268–3283. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harto, Christopher, Robert Meyers, and Eric Williams. 2010. Life cycle water use of low-carbon transport fuels. Energy Policy 38, no. 9: 4933–4944. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, Thomas W., Wallace E. Tyner, and Dileep K. Birur. 2010. The global impacts of biofuel mandates. Energy Journal 31, no. 1: 75–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton-Alico, Doann. 1982. Alcohol fuels: Policies, production, and potential. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2004. Biofuels for transport: An international perspective. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and World Bank. 2010. The scope of fossil-fuel subsidies in 2009 and a roadmap for phasing out fossil-fuel subsidies. Seoul: G-20 Summit.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, René. 1994. Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability. The problem of technological regime shifts. Futures 26, no. 10: 1023–46. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, René. 1997. Environmental policy and technical change: A comparison of the technological impact of policy instruments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, René, Saeed Parto, and Robert B. Gibson. 2005. Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8, no. 1/2: 12–30. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2005.007372
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, René, Johan Schot, and Remco Hoogma. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10, no. 2: 175–195. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, Stephen J., and Nathan Rosenberg. 1986. An overview to innovation. In The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth, ed. R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, 275–305. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovarik, Bill. 1998. Henry Ford, Charles Kettering and the ’fuel of the future. Automotive History Review 32: 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lal, R. 2008. Crop residues as soil amendments and feedstock for bioethanol production. Waste Management 28, no. 4: 747–758. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, James. 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences 42: 323–340. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamu, Rethabile, and Harro von Blottnitz. 2011. 2nd Generation biofuels a sure bet? A life cycle assessment of how things could go wrong. Journal of Cleaner Production 19, no. 2/3: 138–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, Kimberley A., W. Michael Griffin, and H. Scott Matthews. 2011. Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels. Environmental Science & Technology 45, no. 1: 132–138. doi: 10.1021/es1024993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Biodiesel Board. 2012. U.S. biodiesel production. National Biodiesel Board. http://www.biodiesel.org/production/production-statistics (accessed May 1, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Nill, Jan, and René Kemp. 2009. Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? Research Policy 38: 668–680. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2008. Economic assessment of biofuel support policies. Paris: Directorate for Trade and Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, Greg. 2005. Biodiesel. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, Carlota. 2010. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 185–202. doi: 10.1093/cje/bep051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, Trevor, and Wiebe Bijker. 1984. The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14: 399–441. doi: 10.1177/030631284014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plevin, Richard J., Michael O'Hare, Andrew D. Jones, Margaret S. Torn, and Holly K. Gibbs. 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels’ indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environmental Science & Technology 44, no. 21: 8015–8021. doi: 10.1021/es101946t
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renewable Fuels Association. 2013. Industry statistics. Renewable Fuels Association 2013. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/statistics (accessed May 1, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Rosillo-Callé, Frank. 1990. Liquid fuels. In Bioenergy and the environment, ed. J. Pasztor and L.A. Kristoferson, 113–61. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, Jan, René Kemp, and Marjolein Asselt. 2001. More evolution than revolution. Foresight 3, no. 1: 15–31. doi: 10.1108/14636680110803003
   Google Scholar
• Sanden, Bjorn A., and Karl M. Hillman. 2011. A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Research Policy 40: 403–414. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnoor, Jerald L., Otto C. Doering III, Dara Entekhabi, Edward A. Hiler, Theodore L. Hullar, G. David Tilman, William S. Logan, Nancy Huddleston, and Michael J. Stoever. 2008. Water implications of biofuels production in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, Johan, and Frank Geels. 2008. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20, no. 5: 537–554. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapouri, Hosein, James A. Duffield, and Michael Wang. 2002. The energy balance of corn ethanol: An update. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adrian, Jan-Peter Voss, and John Grin. 2010. Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy 39: 435–448. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger, Ulrich, Wouter Achterberg, Kornelis Blok, Henning Bode, Walter Frenz, Corinna Gather, Gerd Hanekemp, et al. 2005. Sustainable development and innovation in the energy sector. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. 2008. Sustainable biofuels: Prospects and challenges. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 2007. Report of the special rapporteur on the right to food. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Regulation of fuels and fuel additives: Changes to renewable fuels standard program. Final Rule, March 22, 2010. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-03-26/pdf/2010-3851.pdf (accessed October 16, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Guidance on new fuel pathway approval process. US Environmental Protection Agency, October 22, 2012. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/compliancehelp/rfs2-lca-pathways.htm (accessed January 2, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Verbong, Geert P.J., and Derk Loorbach, eds. 2012. Governing the energy transition: Reality, illusion or necessity? Routledge studies on sustainability transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, Jan-Peter, and René Kemp. 2005. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development – Incorporating feedback in social problem solving. Paper read at ESEE conference – Special session on Transition Management, June 14–17, in Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Wakeley, Heather L., Chris T. Hendrickson, W. Michael Griffin, and H. Scott Matthews. 2009. Economic and environmental transportation effects of large-scale ethanol production and distribution in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 43, no. 7: 2228–2233. doi: 10.1021/es8015827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata, Clovis, and Paul Nieuwenhuis. 2009. Driving on liquid sunshine – The Brazilian biofuel experience: A policy driven analysis. Business Strategy & the Environment (John Wiley & Sons, Inc) 18, no. 8: 528–541. doi: 10.1002/bse.616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata, Clovis, and Paul Nieuwenhuis. 2010. Exploring innovation in the automotive industry: New technologies for cleaner cars. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, no. 1: 14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar