The determinants of academic patenting by Italian universities

References

• Agrawal, A., and R. Henderson. 2002. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 48: 44–60 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C. 2008. The localised technological change. Toward the economics of complexity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anvur. 2013. La terza missione nelle università e negli enti di ricerca italiani [The third mission of Italian universities and public research institutions]. http://anvur-miur.cineca.it/
   Google Scholar
• Baldini, N. 2010. University spin-offs and their environment. Technology Analaysis & Strategic Management 22: 859–76. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2010.520470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, N. 2011. University patenting: patterns of faculty motivations. Technology Analaysis & Strategic Management 23: 103–21. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.543329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, N., R. Fini, R. Grimaldi, and M. Sobrero. 2014. Organisational change and the institutionalisation of university patenting activity in Italy. Minerva, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Baldini, N., R. Grimaldi, and M. Sobrero. 2006. Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy 35: 518–32. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., and M. Feldman. 2008. Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change and the individual level. Organization Science 19: 69–89. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. van Reenen. 1995. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal 105: 333–44. doi: 10.2307/2235494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesaroni, F., and A. Piccaluga. 2002. Patenting activity of European universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful? SPRU NPRnet Conference, Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-Based Policy, March 21–23, in SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P., and J. Goddard. 2000. The response of higher educational institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education 35: 475–96. doi: 10.1111/1467-3435.00041
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.P., and P.Y. Yang. 2008. The impacts of academic patenting and licensing on knowledge production and diffusion: a test of the anti-commons effect in Taiwan. R&D Management 38: 321–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciappetti, L. 2012. Il ruolo dell'Università nelle politiche regionali di innovazione [The role of University in regional innovation policies]. Istituzioni del Federalismo 33: 337–62.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., K. Hussinger, and C. Schneider. 2012. The nexus between science and industry: Evidence from faculty inventions. Journal of Technology Transfer 37: 755–76. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9214-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Este, P., and M. Perkmann. 2011. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer 36: 316–39. doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrizio, K., and A. Di Minin. 2008. Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Research Policy 37: 914–31. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., and J. Silverman. 2003. University technology transfer: Do incentives, management and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer 28: 17–30. doi: 10.1023/A:1021674618658
   Google Scholar
• Geuna, A. 2001. The changing rationale for European University research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences. Journal of Economic Issues 35: 607–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and L.J. Nesta. 2006. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy 35: 790–807. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and F. Rossi. 2011. Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy 40: 1068–76. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B.H., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics 36: 16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hottenrott, H., and C. Lawson. 2012. Research grants, sources of ideas and the effects on academic research. ZEW Discussion Paper 12-048.
   Google Scholar
• IRPET. 2013. Le politiche per le imprese e l'innovazione in Italia: le scelte delle regioni [Policies for firms and innovation: the ways they are implemented in different Italian Regions]; IRPET (Regional Institute of Economic Planning of Tuscany). http://www.irpet.it
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, C. 2013. Academic patenting: The importance of industry support. Journal of Technology Transfer 38: 509–35. doi: 10.1007/s10961-012-9266-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, A.N., D.S. Siegel, and B. Bozeman. 2007. An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change 16: 641–55. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F., M. Pezzoni, B. Poti, and S. Romagnosi. 2013. University autonomy, the professor privilege and academic patenting: Italy, 1996–2007. Industry and Innovation 20: 399–421. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2013.824192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D.C., R.R Nelson, B.N. Sampat, and A.A. Ziedonis. 2001. The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30: 99–119. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R. 2001. Observations on the post-Bayh–Dole rise of patenting at American University. Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 13–19. doi: 10.1023/A:1007875910066
   Google Scholar
• Nosella, A., and R. Grimaldi. 2009. University-level mechanisms supporting the creation of new companies: An analysis of Italian academic spin-offs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 21: 679–98. doi: 10.1080/09537320903052657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. 2009. Persistence of innovation: Stylised fact and panel data evidence. Journal of Technology Transfer 34: 226–43. doi: 10.1007/s10961-007-9072-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, D. 2005. Lessons from patents: Using patents to measure technological change in environmental models. Ecological Economics 54: 209–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspagen, B. 2006. University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation system. Journal of Economic Surveys 20: 607–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby, and M.B. Brewer. 1998. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review 88: 290–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar