Technological position in alliances network

References

• Ahuja, G. 2000. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21, no. 3: 317–43. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO;2-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, H., V. Havila, P. Andersen, and A. Halinen. 1998. Position and role – Conceptualizing dynamics in business networks. Scandinavian Journal of Management 14, no. 3: 167–86. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00037-7
   Google Scholar
• Arora, A., and A. Gambardella. 1994. Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 24, no. 1: 91–114. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90055-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J.A.C., T. Calabrese, and B.S. Silverman. 2000. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21: 267–94. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant, J., and H. Rush. 1995. Building bridges for innovation: The role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24, no. 1: 97–114. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J. 2000. Network relationships inside and outside the firm, and the development capabilities. In The flexible firm: Capability management in network organization, ed. J. Birkinshaw and P. Hagstrom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. 1972. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2: 112–20. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P., and M.G. Everett. 1997. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks 19, no. 3: 243–69. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P., and M.G. Everett. 1999. Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks 21: 375–95. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett, and L.C. Freeman. 2005. Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P., and D.S. Halgin. 2011. On network theory. Organization Science 22, no. 5: 1168–81. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., F. Lissoni, and F. Malerba. 2003. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy 32, no. 1: 69–87. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cantner, U., and H. Graf. 2006. The network of innovators in jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy 35, no. 463–480. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelin, R. 2003. Networks and technological change in regional clusters. In Innovation clusters and regional competition, ed. J. Brocker, DDaRSE, 52–78. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, T., and E. Rasmussen. 2011. Open innovation policy through intermediaries: The industry incubator programme in norway. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23, no. 1: 75–85. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. 1998. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120. doi: 10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A., B. Gardner, and R. Gardner. 1941. Deep south: A social anthropological study of caste and class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanaraj, C., and A. Parkhe. 2006. Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review 31, no. 3: 659–69. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.21318923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duysters, G.M., J. Hagedoorn, and C. Lemmens. 2003. The effect of alliance block membership on innovative performance. Revue d’Économie Industrielle 103, no. 1: 59–70. doi: 10.3406/rei.2003.3108
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J.H., and H. Singh. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23, no. 4: 660–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., and J. Martin. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105–21. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., and C.B. Schoonhoven. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 7, no. 2: 136–50. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.2.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O., and C. Karlsson. 2006. Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships. Research Policy 35, no. 3: 412–30 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, K. 1997. Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks 19: 157–91. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00300-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, K., and S. Wasserman. 1992. Centrality and prestige: A review and synthesis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 4: 23–78.
   Google Scholar
• Field, S., K.A. Frank, K. Schiller, C. Riegle-Crumb, and C. Muller. 2006. Identifying positions from affiliation networks: Preserving the duality of people and events. Social Networks 28, no. 2: 97–123. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks. I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215–39. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. 1991. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology 96, no. 6: 1478–504. doi: 10.1086/229694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J. 1985. Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology 11: 281–304. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, B., and R. Mcadam. 2011. The promise and problem with open innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23, no. 1: 1–6. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, B., and R. Mcadam. 2013. The convergence of ict, policy, intermediaries and society for technology transfer: Evidence from european innovation projects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25, no. 3: 249–52. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.766684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, B., and B. Dousset. 2005. Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry. Research Policy 34, no. 10: 1457–74. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilsing, V., B. Nooteboom, W. Vanhaverbeke, G. Duysters, and A. Van Den Oord. 2008. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy 37, no. 10: 1717–31. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasmeier, A. 1991. Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy 20, no 5: 469–85. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation pattern: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, no. 4: 619–52. doi: 10.2307/2393756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19, no. 4: 293–317. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., and M. Gargiulo. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Atnerican Journal of Sociology 104, no. 5: 1439–93. doi: 10.1086/210179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. 1993. Understanding the rationale for strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational models of co-operation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14, no. 5: 371–86. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. 1998. Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Review 40, no. 3: 209–27. doi: 10.2307/41165951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A., and R.I. Sutton. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, no. 4: 716–49. doi: 10.2307/2393655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35, no. 5: 715–28. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzy, B., and K. Crowston. 2008. Competency rallying for technical innovation-the case of the virtuelle fabrik. Technovation 28, no. 10: 679–92. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzy, B., E. Turgut, T. Holzmann, and K. Sailer. 2013. Innovation intermediaries: A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25, no. 3: 295–309. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.764982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, T. 2003. Go with the flow – A conceptual framework for supply relations in the era of the extended enterprise. Research Policy 32, no. 3: 503–23. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., and R.S. Burt. 1983. Prominence. In Applied network analysis, eds R.S. Burt and M.J. Minor, 195–222. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., and S. Yang. 2008. Social network analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2, no. 1: 71–81. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. 2001. Peer influence groups: Identifying dense clusters in large networks. Social Networks 23: 261–83. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00042-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mote, J.E. 2005. R&D ecology: Using 2-mode network analysis to understand complexity in R&D environments. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22, no. 1–2: 93–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.E. 1986. The use of blockmodelling in the study of organization structure: A methodological proposal. Organization Studies 7, no. 1: 75–85. doi: 10.1177/017084068600700105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohria, N. 1992. Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? In Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action, eds N. Nohria and R.C. Eccles. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 1992. Towards a dynamic theory of transactions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2: 281–99. doi: 10.1007/BF01200127
   Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., and W.W. Powell. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the boston biotechnology community. Organization Science 15, no. 1: 5–21. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J.M., T.E. Stuart, and M.T. Hanan. 1996. Networks, knowledge, and niches: Compttition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. American Journal of Sociology 102, no. 3: 659–89.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, no. 1: 116–45. doi: 10.2307/2393988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.B. 2000. Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth. Sloan Management Review 41, no 4: 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana-García, C., and C.A. Benavides-Velasco. 2011. Knowledge organisation in R&D alliances: Its impact on product innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23, no. 10: 1047–61. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.621300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rank, C., O. Rank, and A. Wald. 2006. Integrated versus core-periphery structures in regional biotechnology networks. European Management Journal 24, no. 1: 73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2005.12.009
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, T., D. Behrens, and D. Krackhardt. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal 21, no. 3: 369–84. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2002. Social network analysis: A handbook. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., and D.M. Waguespack. 2005. Research on special networks and the organization of research and development: An introductory essay. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22, no. 1/2: 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, T.E. 1998. Network position and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of statategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 668–98. doi: 10.2307/2393679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18, no. 7: 509–33. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44, no. 5: 996–1004. doi: 10.2307/3069443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke, W., V. Gilsing, B. Beerkens, and G. Duysters. 2009. The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and non-core technologies. Journal of Management Studies 46, no. 2: 215–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Wartburg, I., T. Teichert, and K. Rost. 2005. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy 34: 1591–607. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, C.S., and L. Leydesdorff. 2005. Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization 1, no. 2: 185–208. doi: 10.1504/IJTG.2005.007050
   Google Scholar
• Wassermann, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T.P. 1982. Relational networks: An extension of sociometric concepts. Social Networks 4, no. 2: 105–16. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(82)90028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, B., and Y. Park. 2004. A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. Journal of High Technology Management Research 15: 37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Zaheer, A., and G.G. Bell. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal 26, no. 9: 809–25. doi: 10.1002/smj.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar