Real options analysis on strategic partnerships of biotechnological start-ups

References

• Ang, J.S., and S. Dukas. 1991. Capital budgeting in a competitive environment. Managerial Finance 17: 6–15. doi: 10.1108/eb013666
   Google Scholar
• Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81: 637–59. doi: 10.1086/260062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrill & Company. 2010. Biotech 2010. San Francisco, CA: Burrill & Company LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Burrill & Company. 2012. Biotech 2012. San Francisco, CA: Burrill & Company LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. 1988. The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities. Journal of Finance 43: 1235–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb03967.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier-Roignant, B., and L. Trigeorgis. 2011. Competitive strategy: Options and games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, T.E., and V. Antikarov. 2001. Real options: A practitioner's guide. New York: Texere.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J., S. Ross, and M. Rubinstein. 1979. Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics 7: 229–63. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A.K., and R.S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fichter, K. 2009. Innovation communities: The role of networks of promoters in open innovation. R&D Management 39: 357–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, T. 2011. Application of timing option to founding investment decision of biotech start-ups. Journal of Business Chemistry 8: 133–46.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, B., and R. McAdam. 2011. The promise and problem with open innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23: 1–6. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassmann, O., E. Enkel, and H. Chesbrough. 2010. The future of open innovation. R&D Management 40: 213–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geske, R. 1979. The valuation of compound options. Journal of Financial Economics 7: 63–81. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(79)90022-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenadier, S.R. 2000. Option exercise games: The intersection of real options and game theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 13: 99–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00057.x
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A., and R.I. Sutton. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 716–49. doi: 10.2307/2393655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzy, B., E. Turgut, T. Holzmann, and K. Sailer. 2013. Innovation intermediaries: A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25: 295–309. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.764982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, M. 1988. Biotechnology: The university industrial complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, W.C. 1984. Today's options for tomorrow's growth. Harvard Business Review 62: 153–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., and C. Leeuwis. 2009. Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76: 849–60. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulatilaka, N., and A. Marcus. 1992. Project valuation under uncertainty: When does DCF fail? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 5: 92–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1992.tb00229.x
   Google Scholar
• Lawton-Smith, H., K. Dickson, and S. Smith. 1991. ‘There are two sides to every story’: Innovation and collaboration within networks of large and small firms. Research Policy 20: 457–68. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90069-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebeskind, J., A. Oliver, L. Zucker, and M. Brewer. 1996. Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science 7: 428–43. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.4.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majd, S., and R. Pindyck. 1987. Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics 18: 7–27. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(87)90059-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margrabe, W. 1978. The value of an option to exchange one asset for another. Journal of Finance 33: 177–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb03397.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R., and D. Siegel. 1986. The value of waiting to invest. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101: 707–28. doi: 10.2307/1884175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R.G. 1999. Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review 24: 13–30. doi: 10.2307/259034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R.G., and I.C. MacMillan. 2000. Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning. Research Technology Management 43: 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C. 1973. Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4: 707–27. doi: 10.2307/3003143
   Google Scholar
• Minshall, T., L. Mortara, S. Elia, and D. Probert. 2008. Development of practitioner guidelines for partnerships between start-ups and large firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 19: 391–406. doi: 10.1108/17410380810853803
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D., J.E. Oxley, and B.S. Silverman. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue): 77–91. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mun, J. 2006. Modelling risk. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S.C. 1977. Determinant of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5: 147–76. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2012. Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Board.
   Google Scholar
• Paxson, D. 2003. Genzyme biosurgery: A virtual real R&D option case. In Real R&D options, ed. D. Paxson, 271–90. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, G.P. 2006. Science business: The promise, the reality, and the future of biotech. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K., and M.L. Weitzman. 1981. Funding criteria for research, development and exploration projects. Econometrica 49: 1261–88. doi: 10.2307/1912754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F.T. 2002. Technological discontinuities and interfirm cooperation: What determines a start-up's attractiveness as alliance partner. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49: 388–97. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2002.806725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, E.S., and M. Moon. 2000. Evaluating research and development investments. In Project flexibility, agency, and competition, ed. M.J. Brennan and L. Trigeorgis, 85–106. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, H.T.J., and L.A. Ankum. 1993. A real options and game-theoretic approach to corporate investment strategy under competition. Financial Management 22: 241–50. doi: 10.2307/3665941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, H.T.J., and L. Trigeorgis. 2004. Strategic investment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R.L., and J.K. Smith. 2004. Entrepreneurial finance. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis, L. 1996. Real options: Management flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis, L., and S.P. Mason, 1987. Valuing managerial flexibility. Midland Corporate Finance Journal 5: 14–21.
   Google Scholar