Product development as reading and writing doings within sociotechnical practices: the reciprocity between engineers and artefacts

References

• Bijker, W. E. 2010. “How is Technology Made? – That is the Question!” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 63–76. doi: 10.1093/cje/bep068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L. 1994. Designing Engineers. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L. 2002. “Between Thoughts and Object in Engineering Design.” Design Studies 23 (3): 219–231. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00035-7
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555–568. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R., D. Nicolini, A. Langley, and H. Tsoukas, eds. 2013. How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies, 1–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. 2012. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspectives in the Research Process. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1933. Essays and How We Think. Vol. 8 of The Later Works. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Vol. 12 of The Later Works. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkjær, B. 2004. “Organizational Learning: The ‘Third Way’.” Management Learning 35 (4): 419–434. doi: 10.1177/1350507604048271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glock, F. 2003. “Design Tools and Framing Practices.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12: 221–239. doi: 10.1023/A:1023984313005
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. 1999. On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. 1995. “How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds.” Cognitive Science 19: 265–288. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. 2011. “When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies.” MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. 2013. “Theoretical Foundations for the Study of Sociomateriality.” Information and Organization 23: 59–76. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., and S. R. Barley. 2010. “What's Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing.” The Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 1–51. doi: 10.1080/19416521003654160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiasen, J. B. 2012. “Learning Within a Product Development Working Practice: An Understanding Anchored in Pragmatism.” PhD diss., Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations.” Organization Science 11 (4): 404–428. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., and S. V. Scott. 2008. “Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization.” The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1): 433–474. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Edited by J. Buchler. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., and H. Singh. 2012. “Materiality: What are the Consequences?” In Materiality and Organizing, edited by P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, and J. Kallinikos, 287–295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2000. “Case studies.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 435–454. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar