Shadows of the past: path dependence of TV on its sub-systems, complements and substitutes

References

• Agogue, M., P. Le Masson, and D. K. Robinson. 2012. “Orphan Innovation, or When Path-Creation Goes Stale: A Design Framework to Characterize Path-Dependence in Real Time.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (6): 603–616. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.693672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., and C. M. Lampert. 2001. “Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions.” Strategic Management Journal 22 (6/7, Special Issue: Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth Creation): 521–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo, L., and D. Harrison. 2002. “Path Dependence, Agency and Technological Evolution.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14 (1): 5–19. doi: 10.1080/09537320220125856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events.” The Economic Journal 99 (394): 116–131. doi: 10.2307/2234208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 1990. “Positive Feedbacks in the Economy.” Scientific American 262 (2): 92–99. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0290-92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen. 1993. “Knowledge Stocks, Persistent Innovation and Market Dominance: Evidence from a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms.” IFS working paper no. W93/19.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen. 1995. “Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation.” The Economic Journal 105 (429): 333–344. doi: 10.2307/2235494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, S., and A. Offer. 1994. “Household Appliances and the use of Time: The United States and Britain since the 1920s.” The Economic History Review 47 (4): 725–748. doi: 10.2307/2597714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brain, M. 2001. Marshall Brain's how Stuff Works. New York: Hungry Minds.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C. A., and P. K. Trivedi. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comanor, W. S., and F. M. Scherer. 1969. “Patent Statistics as a Measure of Technical Change.” Journal of Political Economy 77 (3): 392–398. doi: 10.1086/259522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A. 1986. “Understanding the Economics of QWERTY: The Necessity of History.” In Economic History and the Modern Economist, edited by W. N. Parker, 30–49. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. A. 1993. Positive Feedbacks and Research Productivity in Science: Reopening Another Black Box. MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K. 2006. Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fusfeld, H. I., and C. S. Haklisch. 1987. “Collaborative Industrial Research in the U.S.” Technovation 5 (4): 305–315. doi: 10.1016/0166-4972(87)90069-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and A. Kumaraswamy. 1993. “Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystems’ Open Systems Strategy.” Strategic Management Journal 14 (5): 351–369. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. A. 1990. “Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure.” Oxford Economic Papers 42 (3): 586–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1990. “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 28 (4): 1661–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., D. C. Jain, and M. S. Sawhney. 1999. “Modeling the Evolution of Markets with Indirect Network Externalities: An Application to Digital Television.” Marketing Science 18 (3): 396–416. doi: 10.1287/mksc.18.3.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2001. “ The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools.” NBER working paper no. w8498.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations.” The Rand Journal of Economics 36 (1): 16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J., B. H. Hall, and Z. Griliches. 1984. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship.” Econometrica 52 (4): 909–938. doi: 10.2307/1911191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 2000. “The US Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process.” Research Policy 29 (4): 531–557. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00088-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, R., and R. Adner. 2012. “What firms make vs. what they know: how firms' production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change.” Organization Science 23 (5): 1227–1248.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, R., and J. M. Lee. 2013. “Coordinating and Competing in Ecosystems: How Organizational forms Shape New Technology Investments.” Strategic Management Journal 34 (3): 274–296. doi: 10.1002/smj.2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R. 2000. “Using Patent Data to Measure Innovation Performance.” Journal of Business Performance Management 2 (1–3): 180–193. doi: 10.1504/IJBPM.2000.000072
   Google Scholar
• Katz, M., and C. Shapiro. 1994. “Systems Competition and Network Effects.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (2): 93–115. doi: 10.1257/jep.8.2.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. A. 1993. The Origins of Order: Self-organisation and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kortum, S., and J. Lerner. 1998. “Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?” Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy 48: 247–304.
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, S. J., and S. E. Margolis. 1995. “Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History.” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 11 (1): 205–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magoun, A. B. 2007. Television: The Life Story of a Technology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D. P., and M. Subramaniam. 2009. “Strategy in Network Industries: A Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Management, 35 (6): 1494–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murmann, J. P. 2013. “The Coevolution of Industries and Important Features of their Environments.” Organization Science 24 (1): 58–78. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narin, F., and E. Noma. 1987. “Patents as Indicators of Corporate Technological Strength.” Research Policy 16 (2): 143–155. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. E. 2006. “Path dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 87–115.
   Google Scholar
• Pakes, A., and Z. Griliches. 1980. “Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Report.” Economics Letters 5 (4): 377–381. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(80)90136-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruzzelli, A. M., D. Rotolo, and V. Albino. 2012. “The Impact of Old Technologies on Innovation: The Case of the US Biotechnology Industry.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (5): 453–466. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.674668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft, R. W., and D. E. Kash. 2002. “Path Dependence in the Innovation of Complex Technologies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14 (1): 21–35. doi: 10.1080/09537320220125865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasso, M., and R. Absalom. 2010. “The Future of TV: The Evolving Broadcast and on Demand Landscape.” Business Insights.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. 1998. “Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure.” The Academy of Management Review 23 (2): 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A., and H. K. Steensma. 2001. “The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis.” The Academy of Management Journal 44 (6): 1149–1168. doi: 10.2307/3069394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shocker, A. D., B. L. Bayus, and N. Kim. 2004. “Product Complements and Substitutes in the Real World: The Relevance of “Other Products.” Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 28–40. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.28.24032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., G. Schreyogg, and J. Koch. 2009. “Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box.” The Academy of Management Review 34 (4): 689–709. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2009.44885978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turba, L. 2011. “A Resource-Based Approach to Strategy Analysis in the New Digital Television Arena.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23 (5): 545–566. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.565670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M. M. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., and M. Iansiti. 2012. “Entry into Platform-Based Markets.” Strategic Management Journal 33 (1): 88–106. doi: 10.1002/smj.941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar