On the importance of boundary objects for virtual collaboration: a review of the literature

References

• Abraham, Ralf, Stephan Aier, and Robert Winter. 2015. “Crossing the Line: Overcoming Knowledge Boundaries in Enterprise Transformation.” Business & Information Systems Engineering 57 (1): 3–13. doi: 10.1007/s12599-014-0361-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akoumianakis, Demosthenes. 2014. “Boundary Spanning Tactics and ‘traceable’ Connections in Cross-organizational Virtual Alliances a Case Study.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 27 (2): 197–227. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-08-2012-0046
   Google Scholar
• Alin, Pauli, Melissa K. Di Marco, and John E. Taylor. 2012. “Exploring Negotiation through Boundary Objects in Global Design Project Networks.” Project Management Journal 43 (3): 24–39. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alin, Pauli, Josh Iorio, and John E. Taylor. 2013. “Digital Boundary Objects as Negotiation Facilitators: Spanning Boundaries in Virtual Engineering Project Networks.” Project Management Journal 44 (3): 48–63. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, Pujak, Dawn Owens, and Deepak Khazanchi. 2010. “A Pattern-based Tool for Knowledge Management in Virtual Projects.” IUP Journal of Knowledge Management 8 (3): 60–80.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, William C., Paul M. Leonardi, and Diane E. Bailey. 2012. “Engineering Objects for Collaboration: Strategies of Ambiguity and Clarity at Knowledge Boundaries.” Human Communication Research 38 (3): 280–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01430.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, Michael, and Eivor Oborn. 2010. “Boundary Object Use in Cross-cultural Software Development Teams.” Human Relations 63 (8): 1199–1221. doi: 10.1177/0018726709355657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, Beth A. 2003. “Sharing Meaning across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor.” Organization Science 14 (3): 312–330. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benn, Suzanne, Melissa Edwards, and Tamsin Angus-Leppan. 2013. “Organizational Learning and the Sustainability Community of Practice: The Role of Boundary Objects.” Organization & Environment 26 (2): 184–202. doi: 10.1177/1086026613489559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benn, Suzanne, and Andrew Martin. 2010. “Learning and Change for Sustainability Reconsidered: A Role for Boundary Objects.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 9 (3): 397–412. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2010.53791823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Mark, Kalle Lyytinen, and Gloria Mark. 2007. “Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (11): 546–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo, Sergio. 2005. “Cooperative Electronic Learning in Virtual Laboratories through Forums.” IEEE Transactions on Education 48 (1): 140–149. doi: 10.1109/TE.2004.837045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, Gregory R. 2011. “Enhancing Effectiveness on Virtual Teams: Understanding Why Traditional Team Skills Are Insufficient.” Journal of Business Communication 48 (2): 186–206. doi: 10.1177/0021943610397270
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, Ganesh, Jatinder N. D. Gupta, and Fred Kitchens. 2005. “An Exploratory Study of Groupware Use in the Knowledge Management Process.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18 (1): 28–46. doi: 10.1108/17410390510571475
   Google Scholar
• Black, Laura J., and David F. Andersen. 2012. “Using Visual Representations as Boundary Objects to Resolve Conflict in Collaborative Model-building Approaches.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 29 (2): 194–208. doi: 10.1002/sres.2106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch-Sijtsema, Petra M., and Anu Sivunen. 2013. “Professional Virtual Worlds Supporting Computer-mediated Communication, Collaboration, and Learning in Geographically Distributed Contexts.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 56 (2): 160–75. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2012.2237256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, Mike. 2010. “Keeping it Real? Constituting Partnering through Boundary Objects.” Construction Management and Economics 28 (6): 615–628. doi: 10.1080/01446191003587711
   Google Scholar
• vom Brocke, Jan, Alexander Simons, Bjoern Niehaves, Bjorn Niehaves, Kai Reimer, Ralf Plattfaut, and Anne Cleven. 2009. “Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process.” Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2009), Verona, June 8–10, paper 161.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, John S., and Paul Duguid. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bull Schaefer, Rebecca A., and Laura Erskine. 2012. “Virtual Team Meetings: Reflections on a Class Exercise Exploring Technology Choice.” Journal of Management Education 36 (6): 777–801. doi: 10.1177/1052562912436912
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, Paul R. 2002. “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13 (4): 442–455. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, Paul R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555–568. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, Paul R., and Eric S. Rebentisch. 2003. “Into the Black Box: The Knowledge Transformation Cycle.” Management Science 49 (9): 1180–1195. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1180.16564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamakiotis, Petros, Elies A. Dekoninck, and Niki Panteli. 2013. “Factors Influencing Creativity in Virtual Design Teams: An Interplay between Technology, Teams and Individuals.” Creativity and Innovation Management 22 (3): 265–279. doi: 10.1111/caim.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, Neel, and Nick Bontis. 2004. “Organisational Learning via Groupware: A Path to Discovery or Disaster?” International Journal of Technology Management 27 (6/7): 591–610. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2004.004904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFranco-Tommarello, Joanna, and Fadi P. Deek. 2004. “Collaborative Problem Solving and Groupware for Software Development.” Information Systems Management 21 (1): 67–80. doi: 10.1201/1078/43877.21.1.20041201/78987.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dishaw, Mark, Michael A. Eierman, Jakob H. Iversen, and George C. Philip. 2011. “Wiki or Word? Evaluating Tools for Collaborative Writing and Editing.” Journal of Information Systems Education 22 (1): 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, Mark, David M. Gann, and Ammon Salter. 2007. “‘In Case of Fire, Please Use the Elevator’: Simulation Technology and Organization in Fire Engineering.” Organization Science 18 (5): 849–864. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, Boris, and Jennifer Whyte. 2009. “Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as ‘Epistemic Objects’.” Organization Studies 30 (1): 7–30. doi: 10.1177/0170840608083014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton, Evelyn M. 2007. “Visualising Strategic Change: The Role and Impact of Process Maps as Boundary Objects in Reorganisation.” European Management Journal 25 (2): 104–117. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Nick J. 2011. “Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies.” Sociology 45 (1): 70–85. doi: 10.1177/0038038510387196
   Google Scholar
• Franceschi, Katherine, Ronald M. Lee, Stelios H. Zanakis, and David Hinds. 2009. “Engaging Group E-learning in Virtual Worlds.” Journal of Management Information Systems 26 (1): 73–100. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, Uri, Kalle Lyytinen, and Youngjin Yoo. 2008. “The Dynamics of IT Boundary Objects, Information Infrastructures, and Organisational Identities: The Introduction of 3D Modelling Technologies into the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry.” European Journal of Information Systems 17 (3): 290–304. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2008.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasson, Susan. 2005. “Boundary-spanning Knowledge-sharing in E-collaboration.” Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 245b.
   Google Scholar
• Gasson, Susan. 2006. “A Genealogical Study of Boundary-spanning IS Design.” European Journal of Information Systems 15 (1): 26–41. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Cristina B., and Jennifer L. Gibbs. 2006. “Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 51 (3): 451–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Tom, Chris Stary, and Alex Totter. 2005. “User-centered Awareness in Computer-supported Cooperative Work-systems: Structured Embedding of Findings from Social Sciences.” International Journal of Human-computer Interaction 18 (3): 323–360. doi: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1803_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., T. B. Lawrence, and D. Grant. 2005. “Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity.” Academy of Management Review 30 (1): 58–77. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harr, R., and M. Wiberg. 2008. “Lost in Translation: Investigating the Ambiguity of Availability Cues in an Online Media Space.” Behaviour & Information Technology 27 (3): 243–262. doi: 10.1080/01449290600874865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holford, David W. 2012. “Re-examining the Concept of Boundary Objects within Communities of Practice.” Global Conference on Business & Finance Proceedings 7 (1): 258–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Jack F., and Sara Vai. 2009. “Knowledge-sharing in Cross-functional Virtual Teams.” Journal of General Management 34 (2): 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Ruey-Lin, Dun-Hou Tsai, and Ching-Fang Lee. 2012. “Collaborative Knowing: The Adaptive Nature of Cross-boundary Spanning.” Journal of Management Studies 49 (3): 463–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Eugenia Y., and Travis K. Huang. 2013. “Exploring the Effect of Boundary Objects on Knowledge Interaction.” Decision Support Systems 56: 140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iorio, Josh, and John E. Taylor. 2014. “Boundary Object Efficacy: The Mediating Role of Boundary Objects on Task Conflict in Global Virtual Project Networks.” International Journal of Project Management 32 (1): 7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii, Hiroshi, and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. “Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, edited by Steven Pemberton, 234–241. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Quentin, Gilad Ravid, and Sheizaf Rafaeli. 2004. “Information Overload and the Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration.” Information Systems Research 15 (2): 194–210. doi: 10.1287/isre.1040.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimble, Chris, Corinne Grenier, and Karine Goglio-Primard. 2010. “Innovation and Knowledge Sharing across Professional Boundaries: Political Interplay between Boundary Objects and Brokers.” International Journal of Information Management 30 (5): 437–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, Thomas, Kurt Matzler, and Johann Füller. 2009. “Avatar-based Innovation: Using Virtual Worlds for Real-world Innovation.” Technovation 29 (6/7): 395–407. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, Kaj U. 2005. “Metaphoric Boundary Objects as Co-ordinating Mechanisms in the Knowledge Sharing of Innovation Processes.” European Journal of Innovation Management 8 (3): 323–335. doi: 10.1108/14601060510610180
   Google Scholar
• Kosonen, Miia, and Aino Kianto. 2009. “Applying Wikis to Managing Knowledge—A Socio-technical Approach.” Knowledge and Process Management 16 (1): 23–29. doi: 10.1002/kpm.322
   Google Scholar
• Krista, Krista K., Chester K. To, Z. M. Zhang, Eric W. Ngai, and Theresa L. Chan. 2011. “Analytic Collaboration in Virtual Innovation Projects.” Journal of Business Research 64 (12): 1327–1334. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Charlotte P. 2007. “Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16 (3): 307–339. doi: 10.1007/s10606-007-9044-5
   Google Scholar
• Leimeister, Jan M., Pascal Sidiras, and Helmut Krcmar. 2004. “Success Factors of Virtual Communities from the Perspective of Members and Operators: An Empirical Study.” Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, January 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Levina, Natalia. 2005. “Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-action View.” Information Systems Research 16 (2): 109–130. doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, Natalia, and Emmanuelle Vaast. 2005. “The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 29 (2): 335–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, Natalia, and Emmanuelle Vaast. 2006. “Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on Information Technology Use in Boundary Spanning.” Journal of Management Information Systems 22 (4): 13–37. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222220402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Floyd L., Deepinder Bajwa, and Graham Pervan. 2004. “An Empirical Assessment of the Assimilation Patterns and the Benefits of Collaborative Information Technology.” Journal of Computer Information Systems 44 (4): 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Jane, and Toni Robertson. 2011. “Physical Space and Information Space: Studies of Collaboration in Distributed Multi-disciplinary Medical Team Meetings.” Behaviour & Information Technology 30 (4): 443–454. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.577194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Meng, and Ritu Agarwal. 2007. “Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities.” Information Systems Research 18 (1): 42–67. doi: 10.1287/isre.1070.0113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, Ann, Philip H. More, and Samer Faraj. 2012. “Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-functional Teams.” Organization Science 23 (4): 951–970. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, Tara, Steve Whittaker, Hernan Badenes, and Barton A. Smith. 2014. “Beyond End User Content to Collaborative Knowledge Mapping: Interrelations among Community Social Tools.” In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, MD, USA, February 15–19, 900–910. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, Joseph E. 1991. “Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups.” Small Group Research 22 (2): 147–174. doi: 10.1177/1046496491222001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, Mitzi M., Anne P. Massey, and Nicholas S. Lockwood. 2011. “3D Collaborative Virtual Environments: Exploring the Link between Collaborative Behaviors and Team Performance.” Decision Sciences 42 (2): 451–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2011.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, Davide, Jeanne Mengis, and Jacky Swan. 2012. “Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-disciplinary Collaboration.” Organization Science 23 (3): 612–629. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oborn, Eivor, and Sandra Dawson. 2010. “Learning Across Communities of Practice: An Examination of Multidisciplinary Work.” British Journal of Management 21 (4): 843–858. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollier-Malaterre, Ariane, Nancy P. Rothbard, and Justin M. Berg. 2013. “When Worlds Collide in Cyberspace: How Boundary Work in Online Social Networks Impacts Professional Relationships.” Academy of Management Review 38 (4): 645–669. doi: 10.5465/amr.2011.0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. 2007. “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work.” Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswick, Cliff, and Maxine Robertson. 2009. “Boundary Objects Reconsidered: From Bridges and Anchors to Barricades and Mazes.” Journal of Change Management 9 (2): 179–193. doi: 10.1080/14697010902879137
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, K., and C. Pellegrin. 2007. “Dynamics of a Project through Intermediary Objects of Design (IODs): A Sensemaking Perspective.” International Journal of Project Management 25 (5): 437–445. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Souren, Priya Seetharaman, Imad Samarah, and Peter P. Mykytyn. 2004. “Impact of Heterogeneity and Collaborative Conflict Management Style on the Performance of Synchronous Global Virtual Teams.” Information & Management 41 (3): 303–321. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00076-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlowski, Suzanne D., and Daniel Robey. 2004. “Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals.” MIS Quarterly 28 (4): 645–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlowski, Suzanne, and Arjan Raven. 2000. "Supporting Shared Information Systems: Boundary Objects, Communities, and Brokering." ICIS 2000 proceedings, paper 30. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2000/30.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, Christiane, Anne-Katrin Neyer, and Kathrin M. Möslein. 2012. “Innovation Practices and their Boundary-crossing Mechanisms: A Review and Proposals for the Future.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (2): 181–217. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.647647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, Sandra M. 2007. “Can You Hear What I See? Nonverbal Communication and the Changing Face of TML.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 20: 972–995.
   Google Scholar
• Riemer, Kai, and Frank Frößler. 2007. “Introducing Real-time Collaboration Systems: Development of a Conceptual Scheme and Research Directions.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 20: 204–225.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, Christoph, Helena Vranešić, and Roland Holten. 2014. “Boundary Interactions and Motors of Change in Requirements Elicitation: A Dynamic Perspective on Knowledge Sharing.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 15 (6): 306–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saparova, Dinara, Francis Kibaru, and Josipa Bašić. 2013. “Use of Widgets as Information Management Tools in Online Shared Spaces.” International Journal of Information Management 33 (2): 401–407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapsed, Jonathan, and Ammon Salter. 2004. “Postcards from the Edge: Local Communities, Global Programs and Boundary Objects.” Organization Studies 25 (9): 1515–1534. doi: 10.1177/0170840604047998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, Carol, Anne F. Rutkowski, Michiel van Genuchten, Doug Vogel, and Julio M. Orrego. 2011. “Virtual Space and Place: Theory and Test.” MIS Quarterly 35 (4): 1079–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeil, Andreas, Martin J. Eppler, and Sara de Freitas. 2012. “A Structured Approach for Designing Collaboration Experiences for Virtual Worlds.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13 (10): 836–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Kjeld, and Liam Bannon. 1992. “Taking CSCW Seriously.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1 (1–2): 7–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00752449
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan L. 1989. “The Structure of Ill-structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving.” In Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 2, edited by Les Gasser and Michael N. Huhns, 37–54. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, Vas, Dan V. Caprar, Daniel Rottig, Riikka M. Sarala, Norhayati Zakaria, Fang Zhao, Alfredo Jiménez, et al. 2013. “A Global Classroom? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Global Virtual Collaboration as a Teaching Tool in Management Education.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12 (3): 414–435. doi: 10.5465/amle.2012.0195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, David, David Denyer, and Palminder Smart. 2003. “Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review.” British Journal of Management 14 (3): 207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trist, E. L. 1951. “Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-getting: An Examination of the Psychological Situation and Defences of a Work Group in Relation to the Social Structure and Technological Content of the Work System.” Human Relations 4 (1): 3–38. doi: 10.1177/001872675100400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Xiangyu, Peter E. Love, Mi J. Kim, and Wei Wang. 2014. “Mutual Awareness in Collaborative Design: An Augmented Reality Integrated Telepresence System.” Computers in Industry 65 (2): 314–324. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2013.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 1998. “Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System.” The Systems Thinker 9 (5). https://thesystemsthinker.com/communities-of-practice-learning-as-a-social-system/.
   Google Scholar