Automated feature extraction from social media for systematic lead user identification

References

• Allen, T. J., and D. G. Marquis. 1964. “Positive and Negative Biasing Sets: The Effects of Prior Experience on Research Performance.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-11 (4): 158–161. doi: 10.1109/TEM.1964.6446424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthonisse, J. M. 1971. The Rush in a Directed Graph. Technical Report BN 9/71, Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Arenas-Márquez, F. J., M. R. Martínez-Torres, and S. L. Toral. 2014. “Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communities from the Perspective of Social Network Analysis.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (8): 927–942. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.923565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavelas, A. 1950. “Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented Groups.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22 (6): 725–730. doi: 10.1121/1.1906679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beevolve. 2015. “An Exhaustive Study of Twitter Users Across The World - Social Media Analytics | Beevolve.”Accessed May 4. http://www.beevolve.com/twitter-statistics/.
   Google Scholar
• Belz, F. -M., and W. Baumbach. 2010. “Netnography as a Method of Lead User Identification.” Creativity and Innovation Management 19 (3): 304–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgram, V., A. Brem, and K. Voigt. 2008. “User-centric Innovations in New Product Development: Systematic Identification of Lead Users Harnessing Interactive and Collaborative Online-Tools.” International Journal of Innovation Management 12 (3): 419–458. doi: 10.1142/S1363919608002096
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, U. 2001. “A Faster Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25 (2): 163–177. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 2001. “Random Forests.” Machine Learning 45 (1): 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunz, M. 2006. “Wenn der Kunde Handelt.” Brand Eins 8 (4): 96–102.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., L. Lü, M. -S. Shang, Y. C. Zhang, and T. Zhou. 2012. “Identifying Influential Nodes in Complex Networks.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 391 (4): 1777–1787. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G., and R. W. Weisberg. 2005. “Following the Wrong Footsteps: Fixation Effects of Pictorial Examples in a Design Problem-Solving Task.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (5): 1134–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, J., E. von Hippel, and M. Sonnack. 2009. Lead User Project Handbook: A Practical Guide for Lead User Research Teams. Cambridge: Lead User Concepts.
   Google Scholar
• Denecke, K. 2009. “Using Sentiwordnet for Multilingual Sentiment Analysis.” In Data Engineering Workshop, 2008. ICDEW 2008, 507-512.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, M. 2000. The Management of Technological Innovation. An International and Strategic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esuli, A., and F. Sebastiani. 2006. “SENTIWORDNET: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion mining.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’06), Genova, IT, May 24–26, 417–422.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. 1971. “Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement among Many Raters.” Psychological Bulletin 76: 378–382. doi: 10.1037/h0031619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., and S. Shah. 2003. “How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing among end-Users.” Research Policy 32 (1): 157–178. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. 1977. “A Set of Measures of Centrality Based upon Betweenness.” Sociometry 40: 35–41. doi: 10.2307/3033543
   Google Scholar
• Füller, J., M. Bartl, H. Ernst, and H. Mühlbacher. 2006. “Community Based Innovation: How to Integrate Members of Virtual Communities into new Product Development.” Electronic Commerce Research 6 (1): 57–73. doi: 10.1007/s10660-006-5988-7
   Google Scholar
• Füller, J., G. Jawecki, and H. Mühlbacher. 2007. “Innovation Creation by Online Basketball Communities.” Journal of Business Research 60 (1): 60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G., D. A. Levinthal, and J. W. Rivkin. 2005. “Strategy Making in Novel and Complex Worlds: the Power of Analogy.” Strategic Management Journal 26: 691–712. doi: 10.1002/smj.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guveritz, S. 1983. “Technology Will Shorten Product Life-Cycles.” Business Marketing 12: 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M., E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten. 2009. “The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update.” SIGKDD Explorations 11 (1): 10–18. doi: 10.1145/1656274.1656278
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., and R. Tibshirani. 1998. “Classification by Pairwise Coupling.” Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10, NIPS '97, Denver, CO, December 2–4, 507–513.
   Google Scholar
• Hemetsberger, A. 2002. “Fostering Cooperation on the Internet: Social Exchange Processes in Innovative Virtual Consumer Communities.” Advances in Consumer Research, 29: 354–356.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, L. B., and L. Frederiksen. 2006. “Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments.” Organization Science 17 (1): 45–63. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keerthi, S. S., S. K. Shevade, C. Bhattacharyya, and K. R. K. Murthy. 2001. “Improvements to Platt's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design.” Neural Computation 13 (3): 637–649. doi: 10.1162/089976601300014493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kira, K., and L. A. Rendell. 1992. “A Practical Approach to Feature Selection.” Paper presented at the ninth international workshop on machine learning, Aberdeen, Scotland, July 1–3, 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Kononenko, I. 1994. “Estimating Attributes: Analysis and Extensions of RELIEF.” Paper presented at the European conference on machine learning, Catania, Italy, April 6–8, 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 1998. “On Netnography: Initial Reflections on Consumer Research Investigations of Cyberculture.” Advances in Consumer Research 25: 366–371.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 1999. “E-Tribalized Marketing? The Strategic Implication of Virtual Communities of Consumption.” European Management Journal 17: 252–264. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 2006. “Click to Connect: Netnography and Tribal Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 46 (3): 279–288. doi: 10.2501/S0021849906060338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, J., and C. Lettl. 2008. “Social Network Perspective of Lead Users and Creativity: An Empirical Study among Children.” Creativity and Innovation Management 17 (1): 26–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00466.x
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, J., C. Lettl, N. Franke, and P. A. Gloor. 2015. “The Social Network Position of Lead Users.” Journal of Product Innovation Management. doi:10.1111/jpim.12291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K. 2006. “ Broadcast Search in Problem Solving: Attracting Solutions from the Periphery.” MIT Sloan School of Management, Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Latora, V., and M. Marchiori. 2007. “A Measure of Centrality Based on Network Efficiency.” New Journal of Phyics 9 (6): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Leskovec, J., and A. Krevl. 2014. “{SNAP}: A General Purpose Network Analysis and Graph Mining Library in {C++}.” Accessed June1. http://snap.stanford.edu/snap.
   Google Scholar
• Lüthje, C. 2000. Kundenorientierung im innovationsprozess. Eine Untersuchung der Kunden-Hersteller-Interaktion in Konsumgütermärkten, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Lüthje, C., and C. Herstatt. 2004. “The Lead User Method: An Outline of Empirical Findings and Issues for Future Research.” R&D Management 34 (5): 553–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Torres, M. R. 2014. “Analysis of Open Innovation Communities from the Perspective of Social Network Analysis.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (4): 435–451. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.851378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, E. L., and G. Bakke, 2001. “Implementing the Lead User Method in a High Technology Firm: A Longitudinal Study of Intentions Versus Actions.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (6): 388–395. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00111-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajo, S., D. Vandevenne, and J. R. Duflou. 2015. “Systematic Online Lead User Identification: Case Study for Electrical Installations.” Paper presented at the proceedings of 20th international conference on engineering design, ICED15, Milan, Italy, June 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pajo, S., P. Verhaegen, D. Vandevenne, and J. R. Duflou. 2014. “Lead User Identification through Twitter: Case Study for Camera Lens Products.” Paper presented at proceedings of NordDesign 2014. NordDesign, 2014, 294–302.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, B. J. II. 1993. Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J. 1998. Fast Training of Support Vector Machines Using Sequential Minimal Optimization. Cambridge, MA: Advances in Kernel Methods – Support Vector Learning, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollok, P., D. Lüttgens, and F. Piller. 2014. “ Leading Edge Users and Latent Consumer Needs in Electromobility: Findings from a Nethnographic Study of User Innovation in High-Tech Online Communities.” RWTH-TIM Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaraman, A., and J. D. Ullman. 2011. Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robnik-Sikonja, M., and I. Kononenko. 1997. “An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression.” Paper presented at the fourteenth international conference on machine learning, Nashville, TN, USA, July 8–12, 296–304.
   Google Scholar
• Sabidussi, G. 1966. “The Centrality Index of a Graph.” Psychometrika 31: 581–603. doi: 10.1007/BF02289527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M., and R. Prügl. 2008. “Extending Lead-User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Lead Userness.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 25 (4): 331–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, S. 2000. “ Sources and Patterns of Innovation in a Consumer Products Field: Innovations in Sporting Equipment.” MIT Sloan School of Management, Working Paper 4105.
   Google Scholar
• Spärck Jones, K. 1972. “A Statistical Interpretation of Term Specificity and Its Application in Retrieval.” Journal of Documentation 28: 11–21. doi: 10.1108/eb026526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudman, S. 1985. “Efficient Screening Methods for the Sampling of Geographically Clustered Special Populations.” Journal of Marketing Research 22: 20–29. doi: 10.2307/3151547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitter. 2015. Twitter Company Info. Accessed June 15. https://about.twitter.com/company.
   Google Scholar
• Twitter Developers. 2015. “Twitter Search API | Twitter Developers. Twitter, Inc.” Accessed January 29. https://dev.twitter.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar