Are the BRIC countries overtaking intermediate countries in the race for international R&D? The case of Spain

References

• Achcaoucaou, F., P. Miravitlles, and F. León-Darder. 2014. “Knowledge Sharing and Subsidiary R&D Mandate Development: A Matter of Dual Embeddedness.” International Business Review 23 (1): 76–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambos, B., and T. C. Ambos. 2011. “Meeting the Challenge of Offshoring R&D: An Examination of Firm- and Location-specific Factors.” R&D Management 41 (2): 107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. J., and M. Casson. 1976. The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. New York: Holmes & Meier.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. J., and N. Hashai. 2014. “The Role of Technological Catch Up and Domestic Market Growth in the Genesis of Emerging Country Based Multinationals.” Research Policy 43: 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., and R. Mudambi. 2005. “MNE Competence-creating Subsidiary Mandates.” Strategic Management Journal 26 (12): 1109–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellani, D., A. Jimenez, and A. Zanfei. 2013. “How Remote are R&D Labs? Distance Factors and International Innovative Activities.” Journal of International Business Studies 44 (7): 649–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidlow, A., C. Holmström-Lind, U. Holm, and S. Tallman. 2015. “Do I Stay or Do I Go? Sub-national Drivers for Post-entry Subsidiary Development.” International Business Review 24 (2): 266–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachs, B., F. Kampik, T. Scherngell, G. Zahradnik, D. Hanzl-Weiss, G. Hunya, N. Foster, S. Leitner, R. Stehrer, and W. Urban. 2012. Internationalisation of Business Investments in R&D and Analysis of Their Economic Impact. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. 2014. “2014 Global Survey of R&D Tax Incentives.” Deloitte. Accessed May 5, 2016. http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-global-rd-survey-aug-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Demirbag, M., and K. W. Glaister. 2010. “Factors Determining Offshore Location Choice for R&D Projects: A Comparative Study of Developed and Emerging Regions.” Journal of Management Studies 47 (8): 1534–1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doh, J. P., G. K. Jones, R. Mudambi, and H. Teegen. 2005. “Foreign Research and Development and Host Country Environments: An Empirical Examination of U.S. International R&D.” Management International Review 45 (2): 121–154.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. 1980. “Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests.” Journal of International Business Studies 11 (2): 9–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. ERAWATCH Annual Country Reports. Accessed December 21, 2013. http://erawatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, R., S. Iammarino, V. Mastrostefano, and A. Silvani. 2015. “Looking for Regional Systems of Innovation: Evidence from the Italian Innovation Survey.” Regional Studies 36 (3): 173–186.
   Google Scholar
• Filipetti, A., and A. Peyrarche. 2011. “The Patterns of Technological Capabilities of Countries: A Dual Approach Using Composite Indicators and Data Envelopment Analysis.” World Development 39 (7): 1108–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, R. G., and R. V. Aguilera. 2007. “Globalization and Location Choice: An Analysis of US Multinational Firms in 1980 and 2000.” Journal of International Business Studies 38 (7): 1187–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GII. 2015. “ The Global Innovation Index.” Accessed December 21, 2015. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
   Google Scholar
• Guimón, J. 2009. “Government Strategies to Attract R&D-Intensive FDI.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (4): 364–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostova, T., and S. Zaheer. 1999. “Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise.” Academy of Management Review 24 (1): 164–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle, W. 1999. “The Drivers of FDI into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of International Business Studies 30 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miravitlles, P., L. Guitart-Tarrés, F. Achcaoucaou, and A. Núñez-Carballosa. 2013. “The Role of the Environment in the Location of R&D and Innovation Activities in Subsidiaries of Foreign Multinationals.” Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 15 (2): 170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekkari, R., and C. Welch. 2006. “Reflections on Using Qualitative Research Methods.” The Finnish Journal of Business Economics (LTA) 04/06: 565–574. Accessed April 19, 2016. http://lta.hse.fi/2006/4/lta_2006_04_a7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., and G. Hamel. 1990. “The Core Competence of the Corporation.” Harvard Business Review 68: 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIO. 2015. Research and Innovation Observatory. European Commission. RIO Country Report: Spain. Accessed December 21, 2015. https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Sachwald, F. 2008. “Location Choices Within Global Innovation Networks: The Case of Europe.” Journal of Technology Transfer 33 (4): 364–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedschlag, I., D. Smith, C. Turcu, and X. Zhang. 2009. “What Determines the Attractiveness of the European Union to the Location of R&D Multinational Firms?” Papers WP306, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
   Google Scholar
• Thursby, J., and M. Thursby. 2006. Here or There? A Survey on the Factors in Multinational R&D Location. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2015. World Investment Report 2015. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Voelker, R., and R. Stead. 1999. “New Technologies and International Locational Choice for Research and Development Units: Evidence from Europe.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 11 (2): 199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, C., R. Piekkari, E. Plakoyiannaki, and E. Paavilainen-Mäntymäki. 2011. “Theorising from Case Studies: Towards a Pluralist Future for International Business Research.” Journal of International Business Studies 42 (5): 740–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2015. The Global Competitiveness Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• de Woskin, K. J. 2008. “China: Key Issues for Business.” In China into the Future: Making Sense of the World’s Most Dynamic Economy, edited by W. J. Hoffmann and M. J. Enright, 61–106. Singapore: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1990. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar