Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses

References

• Bauer, F., L. Coenen, T. Hansen, K. McCormick, and Y. Voytenko. Forthcoming. “ Technological Innovation Systems for Biorefineries – A review of the literature.” Circle Electronic Working Papers Series. Papers in Innovation Studies, CIRCLE, Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy, Lund University. No 2016/27.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., M. Hekkert, S. Jacobsson, J. Markard, B. Sandén, and B. Truffer. 2015. “Technological Innovation Systems in Contexts: Conceptualizing Contextual Structures and Interaction Dynamics.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16: 51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne. 2008. “Analyzing the Functional Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems: A Scheme of Analysis.” Research Policy 37 (3): 407–429. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., B. Truffer, and L. Coenen. 2016. “Path Creation as a Process of Resource Alignment and Anchoring: Industry Formation for On-Site Water Recycling in Beijing.” Economic Geography 92 (2): 172–200. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boons, F., and F. Lüdeke-Freund. 2013. “Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State-of-the-art and Steps Towards a Research Agenda.” Journal of Cleaner Production 45: 9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, L. J. 1981. “On the Measurement of Organizational Slack.” Academy of Management Review 6 (1): 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid. 1998. “Organizing Knowledge.” California Management Review 40 (3): 90–111. doi: 10.2307/41165945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge, M., T. Hansen, and A. Klitkou. 2016. “What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature.” Sustainability 8 (7): 691. doi: 10.3390/su8070691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bünger, M. 2010. “Biofuels: Putting Pressure on Petrol.” Renewable Energy World 13 (12): 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1991. “On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 (2): 93–118. doi: 10.1007/BF01224915
   Google Scholar
• Chambost, V., J. McNutt, and P. R. Stuart. 2008. “Guided Tour: Implementing the Forest Biorefinery (FBR) at Existing Pulp and Paper Mills.” Pulp & Paper Canada 109 (7/8): 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambost, V., J. McNutt, and P. R. Stuart. 2009. “Partnerships for Successful Enterprise Transformation of Forest Industry Companies Implementing the Forest Biorefinery.” Pulp & Paper Canada 110 (5/6): 19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandy, R. K., and G. J. Tellis. 2000. “The Incumbent’s Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation.” Journal of Marketing 64 (3): 1–17. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.64.3.1.18033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-C., H.-T. Chang, H.-R. Chi, M.-H. Chen, and L.-L. Deng. 2012. “How do Established Firms Improve Radical Innovation Performance? The Organizational Capabilities View.” Technovation 32 (7–8): 441–451. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherubini, F., and A. H. Strømman. 2011. “Chemicals from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Opportunities, Perspectives, and Potential of Biorefinery Systems.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 5 (5): 548–561. doi: 10.1002/bbb.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., J. Moodysson, and H. Martin. 2015. “Path Renewal in Old Industrial Regions: Possibilities and Limitations for Regional Innovation Policy.” Regional Studies 49 (5): 850–865. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.979321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., M. Janssen, V. Chambost, and P. Stuart. 2010. “Critical Analysis of Emerging Forest Biorefinery (FBR) Technologies for Ethanol Production.” Pulp & Paper Canada 111 (3): 24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Farla, J., J. Markard, R. Raven, and L. Coenen. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions in the Making: A Closer Look at Actors, Strategies and Resources.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 991–998. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D., J. Bessant, and M. Hobday. 2003. “Managing Radical Organisational Transformation.” Management Decision 41 (1): 18–31. doi: 10.1108/00251740310462023
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2014. “Reconceptualising the Co-evolution of Firms-in-industries and Their Environments: Developing an Inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework.” Research Policy 43 (2): 261–277. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., M. P. Hekkert, and S. Jacobsson. 2008. “The Dynamics of Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Introduction to the Special Section.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 521–536. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, E. 2016. “Responding to the Bioeconomy: Business Model Innovation in the Forest Sector.” In Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-based Bioproducts, edited by A. Kutnar and S. S. Muthu, 227–248. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., and L. Coenen. 2013. “Value Chain Analysis of Biofuels: Örnsköldsvik in Sweden.” Project report for TOP-NEST – Technology Opportunities in Nordic Energy System Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., R. A. A. Suurs, S. O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. E. H. M. Smits. 2007. “Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analysing Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (4): 413–432. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellsmark, H., J. Mossberg, P. Söderholm, and J. Frishammar. 2016. “Innovation System Strengths and Weaknesses in Progressing Sustainable Technology: The Case of Swedish Biorefinery Development.” Journal of Cleaner Production 131: 702–715. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. M., and K. B. Clark. 1990. “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 9–30. doi: 10.2307/2393549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. W. L., and F. T. Rothaermel. 2003. “The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation.” Academy of Management Review 28 (2): 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA 2009. “ IEA Bioenergy Task 42 Biorefinery.” http://www.iea-bioenergy.task42-biorefineries.com.
   Google Scholar
• Kamm, B., M. Kamm, P. R. Gruber, and S. Kromus. 2006. “Biorefinery Systems – An Overview.” In Biorefineries: Industrial Processes and Products: Status Quo and Future Directions, Vol. 1, edited by B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber and M. Kamm, 3–40. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Karltorp, K., and B. A. Sandén. 2012. “Explaining Regime Destabilisation in the Pulp and Paper Industry.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2: 66–81. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.” Strategic Management Journal 13 (S1): 111–125. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250131009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008a. “Actor-oriented Analysis of Innovation Systems: Exploring Micro–Meso Level Linkages in the Case of Stationary Fuel Cells.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (4): 443–464. doi: 10.1080/09537320802141429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008b. “Technological Innovation Systems and the Multi-Level Perspective: Towards an Integrated Framework.” Research Policy 37 (4): 596–615. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthis, S. 2014. “ Holmen Paper: ‘We Are People Committed to Paper’.” Pulpapernews.com.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, K., and N. Kautto. 2013. “The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview.” Sustainability 5 (6): 2589–2608. doi: 10.3390/su5062589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metsä. 2015. “ Metsä Group to Build Next-generation Bioproduct Mill in Äänekoski.” Metsä Group Stock Exchange Release 21 April 2015 at 11.30 am.
   Google Scholar
• Näyhä, A., and H.-L. Pesonen. 2012. “Diffusion of Forest Biorefineries in Scandinavia and North America.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 1111–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näyhä, A., and H.-L. Pesonen. 2014. “Strategic Change in the Forest Industry Towards the Biorefining Business.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 81: 259–271. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negro, S. O., and M. P. Hekkert. 2008. “Explaining the Success of Emerging Technologies by Innovation System Functioning: The Case of Biomass Digestion in Germany.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (4): 465–482. doi: 10.1080/09537320802141437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotny, M., and S. Laestadius. 2014. “Beyond Papermaking: Technology and Market Shifts for Wood-based Biomass Industries – Management Implications for Large-scale Industries.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (8): 875–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, D., and V. S. Haritos. 2010. “Conceptual Investment Framework for Biofuels and Biorefineries Research and Development.” Biofuels 1 (1): 201–216. doi: 10.4155/bfs.09.14
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2009. The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Palgan, Y. V., and K. McCormick. 2016. “Biorefineries in Sweden: Perspectives on the Opportunities, Challenges and Future.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 10 (5): 523–533. doi: 10.1002/bbb.1672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu, Y., D. Zhang, P. M. Singh, and A. J. Ragauskas. 2008. “The New Forestry Biofuels Sector.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2 (1): 58–73. doi: 10.1002/bbb.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragauskas, A. J., C. K. Williams, B. H. Davison, G. Britovsek, J. Cairney, C. A. Eckert, W. J. Frederick, et al. 2006. “The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials.” Science 311 (5760): 484–489. doi: 10.1126/science.1114736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RISI 2016. “PPI Top 100.” Accessed April 12 http://legacy.risiinfo.com/images/PPI%20Top%20100%20of%202014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, R. S. 2000. “Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change: The Transformation of NCR in the Electronic Era.” Strategic Management Journal 21 (10–11): 1083–1103. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1083::AID-SMJ127>3.0.CO;2-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, R., and M. B. Sarkar. 2016. “Knowledge, Firm Boundaries, and Innovation: Mitigating the Incumbent’s Curse During Radical Technological Change.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (5): 835–854. doi: 10.1002/smj.2357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, P. 2006. “The Forest Biorefinery: Survival Strategy for Canada’s Pulp and Paper Sector?” Pulp & Paper Canada 107 (6): 13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency. 2014. Teknologiska Innovationssystem inom Energiområdet. Eskilstuna: Swedish Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmanen, J. 2013. Exploring Policy Protection in Biofuel Niche Development. Eindhoven: Technical University of Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar