Boundaries innovation through knowledge convergence-developing triad strategic communities

References

• Barabasi, A. 2002. Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, M., and M. Tushman. 2003. “Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited.” Academy of Management Review 28 (2): 238–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R., and R. Sayles. 1986. Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure, and Managerial Skills. Boston, MA: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555–568. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, G., and J. Schoemaker. 2005. “Scanning the Periphery.” Harvard Business Review 83: 135–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14: 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., and C. Hinings. 1993. “Understanding Strategic Change: The Contribution of Archetypes.” Academy of Management Review 36 (5): 1052–1081. doi: 10.2307/256645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacklin, F., C. Marxt, and F. Fahrni. 2009. “Coevolutionary Cycles of Convergence: An Extrapolation from the ICT Industry.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (6): 723–736. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., and P. Wong. 2004. “Exploration vs. exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis.” Organization Science 15 (4): 481–494. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., and F. Rothaermel. 2003. “The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation.” Academy of Management Review 28 (2): 257–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston, L. and N. Sakkab. 2006. “Connect and Develop Inside Procter & Gamble’s New Model for Innovation.” Harvard Business Review 84 (3): 58–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. 1st ed. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2001. “Creating New Business Through Strategic Community Management.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 11 (6): 1062–1084. doi: 10.1080/713769690
   Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2002. “Transforming an Old Economy Company Through Strategic Communities.” Long Range Planning 35 (4): 349–365. doi: 10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00076-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2003. “Strategic Innovation in Traditional Big Business.” Organization Studies 24 (2): 235–268. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024002345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2005a. “Knowledge Creation Through Networked Strategic Communities: Case Studies in New Product Development.” Long Range Planning 38 (1): 27–49. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2004.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2005b. “How Two Japanese High-tech Companies Achieved Rapid Innovation via Strategic Community Networks.” Strategy & Leadership 33 (6): 39–47. doi: 10.1108/10878570510631657
   Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2006. “Innovation Through Boundary Managing-case of Matsushita Electric Reforms.” Technovation 27 (1–2): 15–29. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2007. The Strategic Community-based Firm. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2009. “Boundaries Innovation and Knowledge Integration in The Japanese Firm.” Long Range Planning 42 (4): 463–494. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2011a. Knowledge Integration Dynamics-developing Strategic Innovation Capability. Singapore: SI World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama, M. 2011b. Interactive Business Communities-accelerating Corporate Innovation Through Boundary Networks. Farnham: Gower Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leifer, R., M. McDermott, C. O'Connor, S. Peters, M. Rice, and W. Veryzer. 2000. Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L., and N. Kulatilaka. 2006. “Network Effects and Technology Licensing with Fixed Fee, Royalty, and Hybrid Contracts.” Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (2): 91–118. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., M. Kodama, A. Hirose, and F. Kohlbacher. 2014. “Dynamic Fractal Organizations for Promoting Knowledge-based Transformation–a New Paradigm for Organizational Theory.” European Management Journal 32 (1): 137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and N. Konno. 1998. “The Concept of ‘Ba’: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation.” California Management Review 40 (3): 40–54. doi: 10.2307/41165942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-creating Company. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., and R. Toyama. 2007. “Strategic Management as Distributed Practical Wisdom (Phronesis).” Industrial and Corporate Change 16 (3): 371–394. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly III, C., and M. Tushman. 2004. “The Ambidextrous Organization.” Harvard Business Review 82 (April): 74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., and W. W. Powell. 2004. “Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community.” Organization Science 15 (1): 5–22. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. 1990. “Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice.” Organization Science 1 (1): 267–292. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1.3.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., and V. Ramaswamy. 2004. The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. L., J. D. Roessner, A. S. Cohen, and M. Perreault. 2006. “Interdisciplinary Research: Meaning, Metrics and Nurture.” Research Evaluation 15 (3): 187–195. doi: 10.3152/147154406781775841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafols, I., and M. Meyer. 2010. “Diversity and Network Coherence as Indicators of Interdisciplinarity: Case Studies in Bionanoscience.” Scientometrics 82 (2): 263–287. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijnsoever, F. J., and L. K. Hessels. 2011. “Factors Associated with Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration.” Research Policy 40 (3): 463–472. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., and A. Nerkar. 2001. “Beyond Local Search: Boundary-spanning, Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry.” Strategic Management Journal 22 (4): 287–306. doi: 10.1002/smj.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2014. “The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in An (Economic) Theory of Firms.” The Academy of Management Perspectives 28 (4): 328–352. doi: 10.5465/amp.2013.0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. 1979. “Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis.” Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (1): 82–98. doi: 10.2307/2989877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., and C. A. O’Reilly. 1997. Winning Through Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, J. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar