Unveiling opportunities afforded by emerging technologies: evidences from the drone industry

References

• Adner, R., and R. Kapoor. 2016. “Innovation Ecosystems and the Pace of Substitution: Re-Examining Technology S-Curves.” Strategic Management Journal 37: 625–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adner, R., and D. Levinthal. 2001. “Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation.” Management Science 47 (5): 611–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami, H., and S. Evans. 1989. “Strategy Making in High-Technology Firms: The Empiricist Mode.” California Management Review 31 (2): 107–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. C., P. Salvatore, and F. Zirpoli. 2005. “The Impact of Virtual Simulation Tools on Problem-Solving and new Product Development Organization.” Research Policy 34 (9): 1305–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, C. B., N. R. Furr, and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2014. “The Opportunity Paradox.” MIT Sloan Management Review 56 (1): 29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. 2008. “Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving: An Introduction and Cases.” Convergence 14 (1): 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Buganza, T., C. Dell'Era, E. Pellizzoni, D. Trabucchi, and R. Verganti. 2015. “Unveiling the Potentialities Provided by new Technologies: A Process to Pursue Technology Epiphanies in the Smartphone app Industry.” Creativity and Innovation Management 24 (3): 391–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2003. “The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property.” California Management Review 45 (3): 33–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesa, V. 2000. “Global R&D Project Management and Organization: A Taxonomy.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 17 (5): 341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1997. Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The two Faces of R and D.2.” The Economic Journal 99 (397): 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2012. “Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D.” Management Science 48: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. 1994. “Perspective Third-Generation new Product Processes.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 11 (1): 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. 2006. “Managing technology development projects.” Research-Technology Management 49 (6): 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G., and A. F. Sommer. 2016. “The Agile–Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising new Approach and a new Research Opportunity.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 33 (5): 513–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzens, S., S. Gatchair, J. Kang, K. S. Kim, H. J. Lee, G. Ordóñez, and A. Porter. 2010. “Emerging Technologies: Quantitative Identification and Measurement.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (3): 361–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuhls, K. 2003. “From Forecasting to Foresight Processes: New Participative Foresight Activities in Germany.” Journal of Forecasting 22 (2-3): 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels, E., and F. Frattini. 2018. “Finding Applications for Technologies Beyond the Core Business.” MIT Sloan Management Review 59 (3): 73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell'Era, C., N. Altuna, S. Magistretti, and R. Verganti. 2017. “Discovering Quiescent Meanings in Technologies: Exploring the Design Management Practices That Support the Development of Technology Epiphanies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29 (2): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreborg, K. H. 1996. “Essence of Backcasting.” Futures 28 (9): 813–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories From Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eto, H. 2003. “The Suitability of Technology Forecasting/Foresight Methods for Decision Systems and Strategy: A Japanese View.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70 (3): 231–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. 2001. “Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search.” Management Science 47 (1): 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, R. 1986. Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage. New York: Summit Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grodal, S., A. Gotsopoulos, and F. F. Suarez. 2015. “The Coevolution of Technologies and Categories During Industry Emergence.” Academy of Management Review 40 (3): 423–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegger, D. L., J. Van Vliet, and B. J. Van Vliet. 2007. “Niche Management and its Contribution to Regime Change: the Case of Innovation in Sanitation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (6): 729–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, J. 2006. The Rise of Crowdsourcing. http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html (Accessed 26 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M. 2000. “How the Incumbent can win: Managing Technological Transitions in the Semiconductor Industry.” Management Science 46 (2): 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. B. 2002. “An Exploratory Investigation of new Product Forecasting Practices.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 19 (2): 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V., and S. Bhattacharya. 2002. “Technology Selection and Commitment in new Product Development: The Role of Uncertainty and Design Flexibility.” Management Science 48 (3): 313–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapré, M. A., and L. N. Van Wassenhove. 2001. “Creating and Transferring Knowledge for Productivity Improvement in Factories.” Management Science 47 (10): 1311–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A. 1998. “The Slow Pace of Rapid Technological Change: Gradualism and Punctuation in Technological Change.” Industrial and Corporate Change 7 (2): 217–247.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R., and J. MacMillan. 2009. Discovery Driven Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Natalicchio, A., A. Messeni Petruzzelli, and A. C. Garavelli. 2017. “The Impact of Partners’ Technological Diversification in Joint Patenting: A Study on Firm-PRO Collaborations.” Management Decision 55: 1248–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotolo, D., D. Hicks, and B. R. Martin. 2015. “What is an Emerging Technology?” Research Policy 44 (10): 1827–1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryall, M. D., and R. C. Sampson. 2009. “Formal Contracts in the Presence of Relational Enforcement Mechanisms: Evidence From Technology Development Projects.” Management Science 55 (6): 906–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino, T., A. Messeni Petruzzelli, and V. Albino. 2017. “Search and Recombination Process to Innovate: a Review of the Empirical Evidence and a Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 19 (1): 54–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A., and E. Green. 2011. “Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: an Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Science.” Research Policy 40: 1321–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. 2007. “Double-boom Cycles and the Comeback of Science-Push and Market-Pull.” Research Policy 36 (7): 1000–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. 1939. Business Cycles. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. 2004, January. The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. New York: Ecco.
   Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. 2007. “Persuasion with Case Studies.” The Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. C., ØD Fjeldstad, C. Lettl, and R. E. Miles. 2011. “Organizing Continuous Product Development and Commercialization: The Collaborative Community of Firms Model.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (1): 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood, A., and G. J. Tellis. 2005. “Technological Evolution & Radical Innovation.” Journal of Marketing 69 (3): 152–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomke, S. H. 2003. Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trabucchi, D., T. Buganza, C. Dell'Era, and E. Pellizzoni. 2018. “Exploring the Inbound and Outbound Strategies Enabled by User Generated big Data: Evidence From Leading Smartphone Applications.” Creativity and Innovation Management 27 (1): 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabucchi, D., E. Pellizzoni, T. Buganza, and R. Verganti. 2017. “Interplay Between Technology and Meaning: How Music Majors Reacted?” Creativity and Innovation Management 26 (4): 327–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twiss, B. C. 1992. Managing Technological Innovation (Vol. 321). London: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Vrande, V., W. Vanhaverbeke, and G. Duysters. 2011. “Technology in-Sourcing and the Creation of Pioneering Technologies.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (6): 974–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verganti, R. 2009. Design-Driven Innovation, Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verganti, R. 2011. “Radical Design and Technology Epiphanies: A new Focus for Research on Design Management.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (3): 384–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verganti, R. 2017. Overcrowded: Designing Meaningful Products in a World Awash with Ideas. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weng, C. S., W. G. Yang, and K. K. Lai. 2014. “Technological Position in Alliances Network.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (6): 669–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar