Knowledge management capability and technology uncertainty: driving factors of dual innovation

References

• Andreas, W., and W. Achim. 2015. “Complex Technological Knowledge and Value Creation in Science-to-Industry Technology Transfer Projects: the Moderating Effect of Absorptive Capacity.” Industrial Marketing Management 47 (5): 98–108.
   Google Scholar
• Ardito, L., and A. Messeni Petruzzelli. 2019. “Inter-Firm R&D Collaborations and Green Innovation Value: The Role of Family Firm’s Involvement and the Moderating Effects of Proximity Dimensions.” Business Strategy and the Environment 28: 185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., E. Gedajlovic, and H. Zhang. 2009. “Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects.” Organization Science 20 (4): 781–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-qiang, Li, Peng Can, and Xi Lei. 2017. “The Effect of Dynamic Capabilities on the Synergy of Ambidextrous Innovation: the Moderating Effect of Environmental-Competitiveness.” Operations Research and Management Science 26 (9): 184–191. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Di, Wu. 2018. “Research on the Relevance of Innovation Atmosphere, Knowledge Management Ability and Breakthrough Innovation Ability.” Science and Technoloy Management Research 15: 176–182. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Jialiang, Qin, and Zhang Yuchen. 2018. “Research on Individual Knowledge-Absorb Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 35 (8): 128–134. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Jie, Zhang. 2012. Research on the Involution of Dual Innovation Capability of Enterprises. Dissertation of Shanghai Jiaotong University.
   Google Scholar
• Juan, Pang, and Jin Shumo. 2019. “Influence of External Network Relationship on Enterprise Dual Innovation: Analysis Based on Knowledge Perspective.” Science and Technology Management Research 11: 19–29. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Xi, Peng Can, and Li Deqiang. 2016. “The Interactive Influence of Dual Learning on Dual Innovation and its Synergy.” Science and Technology Management Research 36 (15): 192–196. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Lixin, Bei. 2018. “The Impact of Organization Dual Innovation on Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Knowledge Base.” East China Economic Management 32 (12): 143–151. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Maier, R., and A. Schmidt. 2015. “Explaining Organizational Knowledge Creation with a Knowledge Maturing Model.” Knowledge Management Research & Practice 13 (4): 361–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, Wang, and Chen Jixiang. 2008. “Research on Dual Innovation Based on Dynamic Capability of Enterprises.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 25 (9): 88–93. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ning, Xu, Jiang Nannan, and Zhang Jin. 2019. “A Study of the Influence of Equity Incentive on Ambidextrous Innovation Strategy of SMEs.” Science Research Management 40 (7): 163–169. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni. 2009. “External Knowledge Sources and Proximity: Towards a new Goegraphy of Technology Districts.” Journal of Knowledge Management 13: 301–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni. 2014. “Balancing Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across the Technological and Geographical Domains.” Knowledge Management Research & Practice 12: 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi, H. 2005. “Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability and Performance of Multi-Business Firms.” MTS Quarterly 29 (2): 311–334.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terawatanavong, C., G. J. Whitwell, and R. E. Widing. 2011. “Technological Turbulence, Supplier Market Orientation, and Buyer Satisfaction.” Journal of Business Research 64 (8): 911–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Xu, Zhang Rongrong, and Jia Jun. 2018. “Research on the Relationship Between Managers’ Succession Source and Binary Innovation Choice of High-Tech Enterprises.” Chinese Journal of Management 15 (12): 1819–1828. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Wenhua, Wang, and Yie Qinyao. 2019. “Research on the Impact of Competitive Strategy on Enterprise Performance from the Perspective of Ambidextrous Innovation Investment.” East China Economic Management 33 (9): 127–133. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Xi, Zhao, and Li Wenliang. 2016. “Research on Relationships Between Knowledge Search Strategy, Technical Uncertainty and Radical Innovation.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 33 (9): 122–127. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Xiuhui, Qi, Wang Yifeng, and Sun Zhengling. 2019. “Dual Innovation, Entrepreneur’s Risk Taking Tendency and Enterprise Performance.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 12 (24): 1–7. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Xuxian, Wan, Wang Hong, and He Jia. 2019. “The Impact of Enterprise Financial Asset Allocations on Ambidextrous Innovation.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 36 (4): 124–131. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Yi, Zhang, and Liu Renhuai. 2019. “Research on the Relationship among Complementary Assets, Platform Leadership and Ambidextrous Innovation.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 36 (6): 66–73. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Yun, Liu, Yang Dongtao, and Zhao Lijing. 2019. “The Fluence of Market Oriented Equilibrium Effect on New Product Performance in Dual-Element Perspective.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 11 (22): 1–7. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar