Innovation ambidexterity and impact on the performance in IT companies: the moderating role of business experience

References

• Andriopoulos, C., and M. Lewis. 2009. “Exploitation-exploration Tensions and Organizational Innovation Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation.” Organization Science 20 (4): 696–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, C. 2006. “The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 741–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M., and M. Tushman. 2003. “Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited.” Academy of Management Review 28 (2): 238–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, P., J. Maicas, and P. Vargas. 2019. “Exploration, Exploitation and Innovation Performance: Disentangling the Evolution of Industry.” Industry and Innovation 26 (3): 295–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., and K. Gupta. 2013. “Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Innovation Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies.” Academy of Management Perspectives 27 (4): 287–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boumgarden, P., J. Nickerson, and T. Zenger. 2012. “Sailing Into the Wind: Exploring the Relations among Innovation Ambidexterity, Vacillation and Organizational Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 33 (6): 587–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brion, S., C. Mothe, and M. Sabatier. 2010. “The Impact of Organisational Context and Competences on Innovation Ambidexterity.” International Journal of Innovation Management 14 (2): 151–178.
   Google Scholar
• Bustinza, O., F. Vendrell-Herrero, and E. Gomes. 2019. “Unpacking the Effect of Strategic Ambidexterity on Performance: A Cross-Country Comparison of MMNEs Developing Product-Service Innovation.” International Business Review 29 (6): 101569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., E. Gedajlovic, and H. Zhang. 2009. “Unpacking Organizational Innovation Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects.” Organization Science 20 (4): 781–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceptureanu, E., and S. Ceptureanu. 2015. “Change Management Survey on Innovative ITC Romanian SMEs.” Quality-Access to Success 16 (44): 62–65.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., and M. Hughes. 2012. “Drivers of Innovation Ambidexterity in Small- to Medium-Sized Firms.” European Management Journal 30 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., M. Hughes, and S. Hotho. 2011. “Internal and External Antecedents of SMEs’ Innovation Ambidexterity Outcomes.” Management Decision 49 (10): 1658–1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M., M. Bonn, and S. Han. 2019. “Innovation Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Startup and Established Restaurants and Impacts Upon Performance.” Industry and Innovation 27 (4): 340–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C., K. Yang, and Y. Chiu. 2018. “Managing Sequential Ambidexterity in the Electronics Industry: Roles of Temporal Switching Capability and Contingent Factors.” Industry and Innovation 25 (8): 752–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csaszar, F. 2013. “An Efficient Frontier in Organization Design: Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Exploration and Exploitation.” Organization Science 24 (4): 965–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. 2014. “Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How.” Journal of Business and Psychology 29 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Fernandez, M., S. Pasamar-Reyes, and R. Valle-Cabrera. 2017. “Human Capital and Human Resource Management to Achieve Ambidextrous Learning: A Structural Perspective.” Business Research Quarterly 20 (1): 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, D., R. Parente, J. Geleilate, and T. Marion. 2016. “Organizing for Innovation Ambidexterity in Emerging Markets Taking Advantage of Supplier Involvement and Foreignness.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 23 (2): 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. 1994. “The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 58 (1): 51–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. Larcker. 1981. “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3): 382–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N., J. Lyngsie, and S. Zahra. 2015. “Organizational Design Correlates of Entrepreneurship: The Roles of Decentralization and Formalization for Opportunity Discovery and Realization.” Strategic Organization 13 (1): 32–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., and J. Birkinshaw. 2004. “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation Ambidexterity.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (2): 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., and P. Wong. 2004. “Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis.” Organization Science 15 (4): 481–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. 2018. “Organisational Ambidexterity and Firm Performance: Burning Research Questions for Marketing Scholars.” Journal of Marketing Management 34 (1–2): 178–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., S. Martin, R. Morgan, and M. Robson. 2010. “Realizing Product-Market Advantage in High-Technology International New Ventures: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation.” Journal of International Marketing 18 (4): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J., M. Tempelaar, F. Van den Bosch, and H. Volberda. 2009. “Structural Differentiation and Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms.” Organization Science 20 (4): 797–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J., F. Van Den Bosch, and H. Volberda. 2006. “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators.” Management Science 52 (11): 1661–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., and Y. Li. 2009. “An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge Management and Innovative Performance: The Case of Alliances.” Research Policy 38 (2): 358–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoutsis, I., A. Papalexandris, and I. Thanos. 2016. “Hard, Soft or Ambidextrous? Which Influence Style Promotes Managers’ Task Performance and the Role of Political Skill.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 30 (4): 618–647.
   Google Scholar
• Katila, R., and G. Ahuja. 2002. “Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (6): 1183–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B., H. Oh, and M. Gregoire. 2006. “Effects of Firms’ Relation-Oriented Behaviors on Financial Performance: A Case of the Restaurant Industry.” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 30 (1): 50–75.
   Google Scholar
• Koryak, O., A. Lockett, J. Hayton, N. Nicolaou, and K. Mole. 2018. “Disentangling the Antecedents of Innovation Ambidexterity: Exploration and Exploitation.” Research Policy 47 (2): 413–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristal, M., X. Huang, and A. Roth. 2010. “The Effect of an Ambidextrous Supply Chain Strategy on Combinative Competitive Capabilities and Business Performance.” Journal of Operations Management 28 (5): 415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., J. Kang, and L. Rosenkopf. 2011. “Balance Within and Across Domains: The Performance Implications of Exploration and Exploitation in Alliances.” Organization Science 22 (6): 1517–1538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., H. Woo, and K. Joshi. 2017. “Pro-innovation Culture, Ambidexterity and New Product Development Performance: Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Analysis.” European Management Journal 35 (2): 249–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennerts, S., A. Schulze, and T. Tomczak. 2020. “The Asymmetric Effects of Exploitation and Exploration on Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance: An Uneven Affair.” European Management Journal 38 (1): 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S., Z. Liu, and S. Zhang. 2018. “Technology Innovation Ambidexterity, Business Model Ambidexterity, and Firm Performance in Chinese High-Tech Firms.” Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 26 (3): 325–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., E. McDonough, J. Yang, and C. Wang. 2017. “Aligning Knowledge Assets for Exploitation, Exploration, and Innovation Ambidexterity: A Study of Companies in High-Tech Parks in China.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 34 (2): 122–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M., Z. Simsek, Y. Ling, and J. Veiga. 2006. “Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration.” Journal of Management 32 (5): 646–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger, J., S. Raisch, and M. Schimmer. 2018. “Dynamic Balancing of Exploration and Exploitation: The Contingent Benefits of Innovation Ambidexterity.” Organization Science 29 (3): 449–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G., and G. Dess. 2001. “Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle.” Journal of Business Venturing 16 (5): 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K., and G. Rose. 2006. “Information System Development Agility as Organizational Learning.” European Journal of Information Systems 15: 183–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. 2002. “Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-up Strategies.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19 (4): 467–488.
   Google Scholar
• Mathias, B., A. Mckenny, and T. Crook. 2017. “Managing the Tensions Between Exploration and Exploitation: The Role of Time.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12 (3): 316–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. 2001. “Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (1): 118–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, N., L. Mathiassen, and D. Robey. 2011. “Building Contextual Ambidexterity in a Software Company to Improve Firm-Level Coordination.” European Journal of Information Systems 20 (6): 674–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C., and M. Tushman. 2013. “Organizational Innovation Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future.” Academy of Management Perspectives 27 (4): 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, M., Z. Zhang, H. Yen, and S. Yang. 2019. “Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Performance in the High-Tech Industry: Quadratic and Moderating Effects Under Differing Innovation Ambidexterity Levels.” Sustainability 11 (18): 5004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretti, F., and G. Negro. 2006. “Filling Empty Seats: How Status and Organizational Hierarchies Affect Exploration Versus Exploitation in Team Design.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 759–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertusa-Ortega, E., and J. Molina-Azorín. 2018. “A Joint Analysis of Determinants and Performance Consequences of Innovation Ambidexterity.” Business Research Quarterly 21 (2): 84–98.
   Google Scholar
• Piao, M., and E. Zajac. 2016. “How Exploitation Impedes and Impels Exploration: Theory and Evidence.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (7): 1431–1447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, D., A. Alexandru, S. Ceptureanu, and E. Ceptureanu. 2018. “Analysis of Nonaka-Takeuchi Model in ITC MSEs from Bucharest- Ilfov Region.” Studies in Informatics and Control 27 (1): 107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, D., S. Ceptureanu, A. Alexandru, and E. Ceptureanu. 2019. “Relationships Between Knowledge Absorptive Capacity, Innovation Performance and Information Technology.” Studies in Informatics and Control 28 (4): 463–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, I., and S. Pilar Pérez. 2012. “Building Ambidexterity: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of Firms from Spain.” Human Resource Management 51 (2): 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., and J. Birkinshaw. 2008. “Organizational Innovation Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators.” Journal of Management 34 (3): 375–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, S., and J. Love. 2018. “Knowledge Context, Learning and Innovation: An Integrating Framework.” Industry and Innovation 25 (4): 339–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F., and M. Alexandre. 2009. “Innovation Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity.” Organization Science 20 (4): 759–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunila, M. 2017. “Innovation Capability in Achieving Higher Performance: Perspectives of Management and Employees.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29 (8): 903–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., C. Heavey, J. Veiga, and D. Souder. 2009. “A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes.” Journal of Management Studies 46 (5): 864–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, J., and T. Stuart. 2000. “Aging, Obsolescence and Organizational Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (1): 81–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stettner, U., and D. Lavie. 2014. “Ambidexterity Under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions.” Strategic Management Journal 35 (13): 1903–1929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., and C. O’Reilly. 1996. “Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change.” California Management Review 38 (4): 8–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinit, P., L. Tom, and W. Joakim. 2016. “Exploration and Exploitation and Firm Performance Variability: A Study of Ambidexterity in Entrepreneurial Firms.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 12: 1147–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walrave, B., A. Romme, K. van Oorschot, and F. Langerak. 2017. “Managerial Attention to Exploitation Versus Exploration: Toward a Dynamic Perspective on Innovation Ambidexterity.” Industrial and Corporate Change 26 (6): 1145–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Z., Y. Yi, and C. Yuan. 2011. “Bottom-up Learning, Organizational Formalization, and Ambidextrous Innovation.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 24 (3): 314–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., H. Yan, and T. Edwin Cheng. 2001. “Benefits of Information Sharing with Supply Chain Partnerships.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 101 (3): 114–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., and W. Bogner. 2000. “Technology Strategy and Software New Venture’s Performance: Exploring Effect of the Competitive Environment.” Journal of Business Venturing 15 (2): 135–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, W., and R. Chen. 2013. “Dynamic Capability and IJV Performance: The Effect of Exploitation and Exploration Capabilities.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 30 (2): 601–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., F. Wu, and A. Cui. 2015. “Balancing Market Exploration and Market Exploitation in Product Innovation: A Contingency Perspective.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 32 (3): 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar