Research types and innovation performance: the mediating effect of paper influence and patent novelty

References

• Agostini, L., F. Caviggioli, R. Filippini, and A. Nosella. 2015. “Does Patenting Influence SME Sales Performance? A Quantity and Quality Analysis of Patents in Northern Italy.” European Journal of Innovation Management 18: 238–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., S. Belenzon, and A. Patacconi. 2018. “The Decline of Science in Corporate R&D.” Strategic Management Journal 39 (1): 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auranen, O., and M. Nieminen. 2010. “University Research Funding and Publication Performance—An International Comparison.” Research Policy 39 (6): 822–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, P., M. Gulbrandsen, and S. Kyvik. 2015. “The Relationship Between Basic and Applied Research in Universities.” Higher Education 70 (4): 689–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbegal-Mirabent, J., and F. Sabate. 2015. “Balancing Basic and Applied Research Outputs: A Study of the Trade-Offs Between Publishing and Patenting.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 27 (10): 1143–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, J., and S. Roper. 2017. “Innovation, Quality Management and Learning: Short-Term and Longer-Term Effects.” Research Policy 46 (8): 1505–1518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustinza, O. F., E. Gomes, F. Vendrell-Herrero, and T. Baines. 2019. “Product–Service Innovation and Performance: The Role of Collaborative Partnerships and R&D Intensity.” R&D Management 49: 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S. H., and L. P. Yu. 2017. “Innovation Quantity, Innovation Quality and Enterprise Benefit – An Empirical Study from High-Tech Industry.” China Soft Science 5: 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q. 2020. “Contradiction Between Input and Output of Chinese Scientific Research: A Multidimensional Analysis.” Scientometrics 123 (1): 451–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., M. Tan, Q. Yu, and P. Wang. 2020. “Research on the Quantity, Quality and Economic Performance of Scientific Research Achievements in Chinese Universities.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 32 (12): 1494–1507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K. C., D. Z. Chen, and M. H. Huang. 2014. “The Relationships Between the Patent Performance and Corporation Performance.” Journal of Informetrics 6 (1): 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q. 2014. Advanced Econometrics and Stata Applications. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coad, A., A. Segarra-Blasco, and M. Teruel. 2020. “A Bit of Basic, a Bit of Applied? R&D Strategies and Firm Performance.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09826-1.
   Google Scholar
• Comino, S., and C. Graziano. 2015. “How Many Patents Does It Take to Signal Innovation Quality?” International Journal of Industrial Organization 43 (5): 66–79.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., and S. Thorwarth. 2012. “Productivity Effects of Basic Research in Low-Tech and High-Tech Industries.” Research Policy 41 (9): 1555–1564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., P. Li, R. Haunschild, Y. Sun, and X. Tang. 2020. “Paper-Patent Citation Linkages as Early Signs for Predicting Delayed Recognized Knowledge: Macro and Micro Evidence.” Journal of Informetrics 14 (2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziallas, M., and K. Blind. 2019. “Innovation Indicators Throughout the Innovation Process: An Extensive Literature Analysis.” Technovation 80: 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisch, C. O., J. H. Block, and P. G. Sandner. 2016. “Chinese University Patents: Quantity, Quality, and the Role of Subsidy Programs.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 41: 60–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersbach, H., and M. T. Schneider. 2015. “On the Global Supply of Basic Research.” Journal of Monetary Economics 75: 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersbach, H., G. Sorger, and C. Amon. 2018. “Hierarchical Growth: Basic and Applied Research.” Journal of Economic Dynamics& Control 90: 434–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., and S. Peng. 2018. “Effects of Patent Policy on Innovation Outputs and Commercialization: Evidence from Universities in China.” Scientometrics 117: 687–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1986. “Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s.” American Economic Review 76 (1): 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, J. C., and N. Ma. 2007. “China’s Emerging Presence in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology—A Comparative Bibliometric Study of Several Nanoscience ‘Giants’.” Research Policy 36 (2): 880–886.
   Google Scholar
• Guan, J., and R. C. Yam. 2015. “Effects of Government Financial Incentives on Firms’ Innovation Performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s.” Research Policy 44 (1): 273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, D., Y. Guo, and K. Jiang. 2016. “Government-Subsidized R&D and Firm Innovation: Evidence from China.” Research Policy 45 (6): 1129–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y. J. 2007. “Measuring Industrial Knowledge Stocks with Patents and Papers.” Journal of Informetrics 1 (4): 269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henard, D. H., and M. A. McFadyen. 2005. “The Complementary Roles of Applied and Basic Research: A Knowledge-Based Perspective.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (6): 503–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higón, D. A. 2016. “In-house Versus External Basic Research and First-to-Market Innovations.” Research Policy 45 (4): 816–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig, D., and J. Henkel. 2015. “Quality Signals? The Role of Patents, Alliances, and Team Experience in Venture Capital Financing.” Research Policy 44: 1049–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., J. Su, X. Xie, and J. Li. 2014. “Basic Research is Overshadowed by Applied Research in China: A Policy Perspective.” Scientometrics 99 (3): 689–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, E. Y., and X. Liu. 2019. “The Different Effects of Basic Research in Enterprises on Economic Growth: Income-Level Quantile Analysis.” Science and Public Policy 46 (4): 570–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, P. H., J. R. Chen, and C. H. Yang. 2014. “Academic Research Resources and Academic Quality: A Cross-Country Analysis.” Scientometrics 101 (1): 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., A. Gutiérrez-Gracia, and J. Vega-Jurado. 2008. “Coexistence of University-Industry Relations and Academic Research: Barrier to or Incentive for Scientific Productivity.” Scientometrics 76 (3): 561–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2: 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 1996. “The Use of Multiple Indicators in the Assessment of Basic Research.” Scientometrics 36 (3): 343–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 1959. “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research.” Journal of Political Economy 67 (3): 297–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. 1991. “What Makes Basic Research Economically Useful?” Research Policy 20 (2): 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prettner, K., and K. Werner. 2016. “Why It Pays Off to Pay Us Well: The Impact of Basic Research on Economic Growth and Welfare.” Research Policy 45 (5): 1075–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. 1990. “Why Do Firms Do Basic Research (with Their Own Money)?” Research Policy 19 (2): 165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, A. J., and B. R. Martin. 2001. “The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review.” Research Policy 30 (3): 509–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. 2014. “Articulating the ‘Three-Missions’ in Spanish Universities.” Research Policy 43 (10): 1760–1773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, F., and V. Larivière. 2015. “Chinese-Language Articles are Biased in Citations.” Journal of Informetrics 9: 526–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., Y. Wang, and M. Li. 2016. “The Influences of Different R&D Types on Productivity Growth in OECD Countries.” Technology Analysis &Strategic Management 28 (6): 651–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toole, A. A. 2012. “The Impact of Public Basic Research on Industrial Innovation: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry.” Research Policy 41 (1): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. H. 2009. “Collaborative Networks and Product Innovation Performance: Toward a Contingency Perspective.” Research Policy 38 (5): 765–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C. Y., and K. L. Goh. 2012. “The Sustainability of Functionality Development of Science and Technology: Papers and Patents of Emerging Economies.” Journal of Informetrics 6 (1): 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., E. W. Welch, and W. L. Huang. 2015. “Commercialization of University Inventions: Individual and Institutional Factors Affecting Licensing of University Patents.” Technovation 36: 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, C. L., and L. T. Gong. 2013. “R&D Ratio, R&D Structure and Economic Growth.” Nankai Economic Studies 2: 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zellner, C. 2003. “The Economic Effects of Basic Research: Evidence for Embodied Knowledge Transfer via Scientists’ Migration.” Research Policy 32 (10): 1881–1895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar